Cicero as correspondent: Selected Letters — OCR A-Level Classical Civilisation
In summary: Cicero as correspondent: Selected Letters is a key topic in OCR A-Level Classical Civilisation. Key exam tip: Use the prescribed letters and 'In Verrem 1' as the starting point for analysis in commentary questions
Exam Tips for Cicero as correspondent: Selected Letters
- Use the prescribed letters and 'In Verrem 1' as the starting point for analysis in commentary questions
- In essays, integrate knowledge of the three key thinkers (Cato, Caesar, Cicero) to demonstrate a deep understanding of the period
- Ensure you can identify and explain rhetorical devices in 'In Verrem 1' such as anaphora, apostrophe, tricolon, and hyperbole
- When discussing Cicero's letters, consider the intended recipient and the context of their publication
- Use secondary scholars to substantiate your arguments in the 30-mark essay
Common Mistakes
- Failing to link political ideas to the specific historical context of the Late Republic
- Treating Cicero's letters as purely historical fact without considering their rhetorical or private purpose
- Neglecting the influence of Stoicism on Cato's political actions
- Over-simplifying the complex relationships between the key political figures (Cicero, Caesar, Cato, Pompey, Clodius)
- Failing to use secondary scholarly views to support arguments in the 30-mark essay
Marking Points
- Understanding of Roman social hierarchy (patrician, plebeian, nobiles, equites, novus homo)
- Knowledge of the res publica structure (cursus honorum, assemblies, senate, provincial government, imperium, dictatorship)
- Distinction between populares and optimates/boni
- Role of patronage, amicitia, inimicitia, idealism, and personal ambition
- Cato's Stoic influence, his conservative idealism, and his opposition to Caesar
- Caesar's popularis reforms, dictatorship, and the reasons for his assassination
- Cicero's political ideals: concordia ordinum and cum dignitate otium
- Analysis of Cicero's 'In Verrem 1' (rhetorical devices, themes of corruption/justice)
Overview of Cicero as correspondent: Selected Letters
Cicero's letters offer an unparalleled window into the final decades of the Roman Republic (c. 68–43 BCE). As a prolific correspondent, Cicero wrote to friends, family, political allies, and enemies, revealing his private thoughts, political manoeuvres, and personal anxieties. The OCR A-Level specification focuses on selected letters from the 'Ad Familiares' and 'Ad Atticum' collections, which cover key events such as the Catilinarian conspiracy, the First Triumvirate, Cicero's exile, the Civil War between Caesar and Pompey, and the rise of Octavian. These letters are not only historical documents but also literary masterpieces, showcasing Cicero's rhetorical skill, wit, and emotional range.
Studying Cicero's letters is crucial for understanding the collapse of the Roman Republic. Unlike his polished speeches or philosophical treatises, the letters are spontaneous and unguarded, providing a raw, first-hand account of political intrigue, corruption, and the breakdown of constitutional norms. They also reveal Cicero's complex personality: his vanity, ambition, loyalty, and despair. By analysing these texts, students gain insight into Roman social customs (e.g., the patron-client system), the role of letter-writing in elite communication, and the ethical dilemmas faced by a politician caught between principle and survival.
Within the OCR A-Level, this topic is part of the 'Roman History and Literature' component. It connects to broader themes such as the end of the Republic, the nature of political leadership, and the relationship between public and private life. Students are expected to analyse the letters both as historical evidence and as literary texts, considering Cicero's use of language, tone, and rhetorical devices. Mastery of this topic requires close reading, contextual knowledge, and the ability to evaluate Cicero's reliability as a source.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are Cicero's letters important for understanding the fall of the Roman Republic?
Cicero's letters provide a first-hand, contemporary account of the political chaos and personal rivalries that destroyed the Republic. Unlike later historians like Plutarch or Suetonius, Cicero writes as an active participant, revealing the day-to-day manoeuvring, corruption, and breakdown of constitutional norms. His correspondence with Atticus, in particular, offers candid insights into the ambitions of Caesar, Pompey, and Crassus, as well as Cicero's own fears and hopes. They show how elite Romans used personal relationships to navigate politics, and how the Republic's institutions failed to contain the ambitions of powerful individuals.
How should I analyse a Cicero letter for the OCR exam?
Start by identifying the date, recipient, and context (e.g., during the Civil War). Then examine the letter's structure: the salutation (e.g., 'Cicero Attico Sal.'), the body, and the closing. Look for rhetorical devices like irony, hyperbole, or rhetorical questions. Consider Cicero's tone—is it formal, angry, flattering, or despairing? Evaluate what the letter reveals about Cicero's character and political stance. Finally, assess its reliability: is Cicero being honest, or is he exaggerating for effect? Always support your analysis with direct quotes from the text.
What is the difference between Cicero's letters to Atticus and those to other correspondents?
Letters to Atticus are generally more intimate, candid, and detailed. Cicero shares his deepest anxieties, political gossip, and personal finances with Atticus, his closest friend and confidant. In contrast, letters to other figures (e.g., Appius Claudius Pulcher or Lucius Lucceius) are often more formal, strategic, and self-serving. For example, in letters to Appius, Cicero is excessively polite to secure a favour, while to Atticus he vents about Appius's arrogance. The 'Ad Familiares' collection includes a wider range of recipients, showing Cicero's public persona, whereas 'Ad Atticum' reveals his private self.
How reliable are Cicero's letters as historical sources?
Cicero's letters are invaluable but must be used critically. They are not objective records; Cicero often exaggerates his own importance, flatters recipients, or omits embarrassing details. For instance, in letters to his brother Quintus, he may downplay his own mistakes. Additionally, Cicero sometimes wrote with an eye to posterity, editing his tone for future readers. However, the sheer volume and variety of letters—many written in haste—make them more reliable than his polished speeches. Cross-referencing with other sources (e.g., Caesar's 'Commentaries' or later historians) helps verify claims.
What key themes should I focus on when studying Cicero's letters?
Key themes include: (1) The decline of the Republic and the rise of autocracy—Cicero's struggle to preserve the 'res publica'. (2) Friendship and patronage—how personal relationships shaped politics. (3) Cicero's self-image and vanity—his constant need for recognition and his fear of obscurity. (4) The tension between public duty and private safety—Cicero's dilemma during the Civil War. (5) The power of rhetoric—how Cicero uses language to persuade, complain, or manipulate. Each letter should be analysed for these themes, with specific examples.
← Back to Classical Civilisation OCR A-Level Specification · All Classical Civilisation Topics