Cicero as orator: In Verrem 1 — OCR A-Level Classical Civilisation
In summary: Cicero as orator: In Verrem 1 is a key topic in OCR A-Level Classical Civilisation. Key exam tip: Use specific examples from the prescribed letters and the Verrine speech to support arguments
Exam Tips for Cicero as orator: In Verrem 1
- Use specific examples from the prescribed letters and the Verrine speech to support arguments
- Demonstrate an understanding of the difference between what a text says and what can be inferred from it
- In extended responses, integrate knowledge of secondary scholars to support your analysis
- Ensure you can define and apply key political terms like 'popularis', 'optimates', and 'novus homo' accurately
- When analyzing the speech against Verres, focus on how Cicero constructs his portrayal of Verres' corruption
Common Mistakes
- Failing to link political actions to the broader ideological context of the Late Republic
- Treating Cicero's letters as purely private documents without considering their potential for publication or public consumption
- Over-simplifying the motivations of political figures like Caesar or Cato
- Describing rhetorical devices without explaining their intended effect on the audience
- Neglecting the impact of the 'First Triumvirate' on the stability of the Republic
Marking Points
- Understanding of the Roman social hierarchy (patrician, plebeian, nobiles, equites, novus homo)
- Knowledge of the res publica, cursus honorum, and the mechanics of the Roman state (assemblies, senate, provinces, imperium, dictatorship)
- Analysis of the ideologies of populares versus optimates/boni
- Evaluation of the roles of patronage, amicitia, and inimicitia in political life
- Understanding of Cato's Stoic-influenced conservatism and his opposition to Caesar
- Analysis of Caesar's popularis agenda, dictatorship, and the causes of his assassination
- Cicero's political ideals: concordia ordinum and cum dignitate otium
- Analysis of rhetorical devices in In Verrem 1 (anaphora, apostrophe, tricolon, hyperbole)
Overview of Cicero as orator: In Verrem 1
Cicero's 'In Verrem 1' is the first speech in a series of speeches (the Verrine Orations) delivered by the Roman orator and statesman Marcus Tullius Cicero in 70 BCE. The speech was part of a prosecution case against Gaius Verres, the former governor of Sicily, who was accused of extortion, corruption, and gross misconduct during his three-year governorship. This topic is central to understanding Roman political and legal systems, as well as the art of rhetoric. Cicero's masterful use of persuasive techniques, emotional appeal, and character assassination not only secured a conviction but also catapulted his own career. For A-Level students, studying this speech offers a window into Roman values, the workings of the extortion court (quaestio de repetundis), and the power of oratory in shaping public opinion.
The speech is particularly significant because it showcases Cicero's rhetorical strategy of 'amplificatio' (exaggeration) and his ability to paint Verres as a monstrous figure who plundered Sicily's art, treasures, and people. Cicero structures the speech to appeal to the jury's sense of justice and Roman pride, contrasting Verres' greed with the dignity of the Roman Republic. The speech also highlights the importance of 'inventio' (finding arguments) and 'dispositio' (arrangement), as Cicero carefully builds his case from the outset. For students, this topic is a case study in how rhetoric can be used to sway a jury, and it provides a vivid example of the political rivalries and legal procedures of the late Roman Republic.
In the wider OCR A-Level Classical Civilisation syllabus, 'In Verrem 1' is studied alongside other works of Cicero and Roman oratory, often as part of the 'Roman History and Politics' or 'Literature and Culture' modules. It connects to themes of imperialism, provincial administration, and the decline of Republican values. Understanding this speech also prepares students for analysing other rhetorical texts, such as Cicero's 'Pro Caelio' or speeches by other orators like Demosthenes. The topic demands close reading of the Latin text (or translation), attention to rhetorical devices, and an appreciation of the historical context, including the role of the Senate, the equestrian order, and the courts in Roman society.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Cicero prosecute Verres?
Cicero prosecuted Verres for two main reasons: to gain fame and advance his political career, and to challenge the corruption of the senatorial elite. Verres was a symbol of the greed and lawlessness that plagued Roman provincial governance. By winning this case, Cicero established himself as a champion of justice and a skilled orator, which helped him become consul later.
What is the structure of In Verrem 1?
In Verrem 1 follows a typical forensic speech structure: exordium (introduction), narratio (statement of facts), confirmatio (proof), and peroratio (conclusion). Cicero begins by praising the jury and attacking Verres' character, then outlines the crimes, presents evidence (including witness testimony), and ends with an emotional appeal for justice. The speech is designed to build a compelling case from the start.
How does Cicero use pathos in In Verrem 1?
Cicero uses pathos by describing Verres' cruel treatment of Sicilians, such as floggings, crucifixions, and theft of sacred statues. He appeals to the jury's pity for the victims and their outrage at Verres' impiety. For example, he vividly describes the suffering of a Roman citizen crucified by Verres, which would have shocked the jury and turned them against Verres.
What was the outcome of the trial against Verres?
Verres went into voluntary exile before the trial concluded, after Cicero's first speech made his conviction inevitable. He was found guilty in absentia and ordered to pay a large fine. The case was a major victory for Cicero and set a precedent for prosecuting corrupt governors. Verres lived in exile until he was later proscribed and killed in 43 BCE.
What rhetorical devices does Cicero use in In Verrem 1?
Cicero employs many devices, including anaphora (repetition of words at the start of clauses), rhetorical questions, hyperbole (exaggeration), and enargeia (vivid description). For instance, he repeatedly asks 'What more can I say?' to emphasise Verres' guilt. He also uses irony, such as calling Verres 'the praetor' sarcastically, to undermine his authority.
How does In Verrem 1 reflect Roman values?
The speech reflects Roman values such as justice (iustitia), piety (pietas), and the importance of the rule of law. Cicero appeals to the jury's sense of duty to protect the provinces and uphold Roman honour. He also contrasts Verres' greed with traditional Roman frugality and respect for property, reinforcing the ideal of the virtuous Roman magistrate.
← Back to Classical Civilisation OCR A-Level Specification · All Classical Civilisation Topics