Depictions and portrayals; mythical barbarians — OCR A-Level Classical Civilisation
In summary: Depictions and portrayals; mythical barbarians is a key topic in OCR A-Level Classical Civilisation. Key exam tip: Use the prescribed visual/material sources as starting points for commentary questions, but draw on a wider range of evidence in extended essays.
Exam Tips for Depictions and portrayals; mythical barbarians
- Use the prescribed visual/material sources as starting points for commentary questions, but draw on a wider range of evidence in extended essays.
- Ensure you can explicitly link the historical context of the Persian Wars to the crystallisation of the 'barbarian' image.
- When discussing Medea or the Amazons, focus on how their status as 'barbarian' is linked to their perceived danger or 'un-Greek' behaviour.
- In essays, make use of secondary scholars and academic views to support your arguments.
- Be prepared to compare the different ways Aeschylus and Herodotus characterise Xerxes and the Persian empire.
Common Mistakes
- Failing to distinguish between the 'reality' of Persian culture and the Greek literary/artistic construction of the 'barbarian'.
- Treating the Greek view of the barbarian as a monolithic, unchanging concept rather than a developing construct.
- Neglecting the role of gender in the construction of the 'other' when discussing Amazons or Medea.
- Over-reliance on literary sources without integrating visual/material evidence.
- Lack of critical engagement with the reliability of Herodotus or the dramatic purpose of Aeschylus.
Marking Points
- Understanding of the geographical extent of the Greek world and the autonomy of poleis.
- Analysis of Greek (dis)unity during the Persian Wars and the concept of 'medising'.
- Knowledge of the origin and connotations of the term 'barbarian' and the use of binary oppositions (e.g., Greek/foreigner, man/woman, slave/free).
- Ability to identify and explain standard visual depictions of barbarians in Greek art.
- Critical analysis of the portrayal of Persians in Aeschylus' 'Persians' and Herodotus' 'Histories'.
- Understanding of the characterisation of Medea and Amazons as 'other' and dangerous.
- Evaluation of the contrast between the 'reality' of Persian culture (e.g., Achaemenid political system, Persepolis) and the Greek view.
- Comparison of Aeschylus' and Herodotus' depictions of the Greeks, Persians, and the Greek victory.
Overview of Depictions and portrayals; mythical barbarians
This topic explores how ancient Greek and Roman writers constructed the figure of the 'barbarian' as a cultural and ideological opposite to themselves. In the context of OCR A-Level Classical Civilisation, you will examine literary and artistic depictions of peoples such as the Persians, Scythians, Gauls, and Germans, focusing on how these portrayals served to define Greek and Roman identity. Key sources include Herodotus' Histories, Euripides' Medea, and Roman historians like Tacitus, as well as visual evidence from Greek vase painting and Roman triumphal art.
Understanding mythical barbarians is crucial because it reveals how ancient societies used stereotypes to justify conquest, slavery, and political superiority. The barbarian is not a historical reality but a rhetorical construct—often characterised by traits like effeminacy, cruelty, irrationality, or excessive freedom. By analysing these depictions, you will learn to deconstruct ancient propaganda and see how similar 'othering' strategies persist in modern contexts. This topic also connects to broader themes of identity, ethnicity, and power in the classical world.
Within the A-Level specification, this topic typically falls under 'Culture and the Arts' or 'Beliefs and Ideas'. You will be expected to compare different authors' perspectives, evaluate the reliability of sources, and discuss how depictions changed over time—for example, the shift from Greek contempt for Persians as 'soft' to Roman admiration for Germanic 'noble savages'. Mastery of this topic will sharpen your skills in source analysis and argumentation, which are essential for the examination.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I analyse a vase painting of a barbarian for my exam?
Start by describing the visual details: clothing (e.g., trousers, pointed caps), weapons (e.g., bows, axes), and posture (e.g., fleeing, fighting). Then consider what these features symbolise to a Greek audience—trousers mark the wearer as 'Eastern' and effeminate, while a bow suggests cowardice (since Greeks preferred close combat). Finally, link the image to a historical context: for example, Amazonomachy scenes on vases often reflect Athenian pride after the Persian Wars, with Amazons standing in for Persians.
Why did the Romans sometimes admire barbarians like the Germans?
Roman authors like Tacitus in his 'Germania' used the Germans as a moral counterpoint to what they saw as Roman decadence. By praising German simplicity, loyalty, and sexual purity, Tacitus implicitly criticised Roman luxury and corruption. This 'noble savage' trope was a rhetorical device, not an objective description—Tacitus never visited Germany and relied on second-hand accounts. It also served to make German resistance to Rome seem more formidable, enhancing Roman prestige in conquering them.
What is the difference between a 'barbarian' in Greek and Roman thought?
In Greek thought, barbarians were primarily defined by language (non-Greek speakers) and culture (lack of polis life, democracy, and rational philosophy). The Persian Wars solidified the idea of barbarians as despotic and hubristic. In Roman thought, the term 'barbarus' was broader, including all non-Romans, but Romans often distinguished between 'civilised' barbarians (e.g., Hellenised Easterners) and 'savage' ones (e.g., Gauls, Germans). Romans also admired certain barbarian traits like martial courage, which Greeks rarely did.
How reliable is Herodotus' account of the Persians?
Herodotus is often called the 'Father of History' but also the 'Father of Lies'. His account of Persian customs (e.g., in Book 1) contains accurate details from Persian sources, but he also includes Greek stereotypes and moralising tales. For example, his story of Cyrus' childhood is legendary, not factual. Use Herodotus critically: compare his version with Persian inscriptions (like the Behistun Inscription) and acknowledge his Athenian audience's biases. In exams, treat him as a literary source reflecting Greek attitudes, not a neutral historian.
What are the key sources for studying mythical barbarians?
The essential literary sources are: Aeschylus' 'Persians' (472 BCE) – the earliest surviving Greek play, portraying Xerxes' defeat as a moral lesson; Herodotus' 'Histories' (c. 430 BCE) – extensive ethnographies of Persians, Egyptians, Scythians; Euripides' 'Medea' (431 BCE) – a barbarian princess who challenges Greek norms; and Tacitus' 'Germania' (98 CE) – a Roman ethnographic study. Key visual sources include the 'Persian' vase in Naples (showing a Greek fighting a Persian) and the 'Alexander Mosaic' from Pompeii (depicting Darius III).
← Back to Classical Civilisation OCR A-Level Specification · All Classical Civilisation Topics