This component explores how the ancient Greeks defined themselves in contrast to their 'barbarian' neighbours, examining the development of Greek identity,
Topic Synopsis
This component explores how the ancient Greeks defined themselves in contrast to their 'barbarian' neighbours, examining the development of Greek identity, the impact of the Persian Wars, and the portrayal of 'others' in literature and art.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Panhellenism: The idea of a shared Greek identity, expressed through common sanctuaries (Olympia, Delphi), festivals (Olympic Games), and myths (e.g., descent from Hellen). Herodotus (8.144) famously lists 'same blood and language, common shrines and sacrifices, and similar customs' as defining Greekness.
- Barbarian: A non-Greek speaker, often stereotyped as inferior or effeminate (e.g., Persians in Aeschylus' Persians). This binary helped Greeks define themselves, especially after the Persian Wars (490–479 BC).
- Polis identity: Loyalty to one's city-state (e.g., Athens, Sparta) could override Panhellenic unity, leading to conflicts like the Peloponnesian War. Citizenship, laws, and local cults (e.g., Athena for Athens) were central to polis identity.
- Myth and kinship: Greeks used shared myths (e.g., the Argonauts, Heracles) and claimed common ancestors (e.g., Ion for Ionians) to assert unity. Colonies often maintained ties through mother-city (metropolis) cults.
- Material culture: Artefacts like pottery (e.g., Panathenaic amphorae), temple architecture (Doric vs. Ionic orders), and burial practices reveal regional variations and shared styles, indicating a common 'Greek' aesthetic.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Use the prescribed visual and literary sources as the starting point for commentary questions
- In extended essays, synthesize evidence from both literature and visual/material culture
- Explicitly address the 'invention' aspect of the topic—how the Greeks constructed an image of the barbarian for their own purposes
- Use secondary scholars to support and develop your critical analysis
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Failing to distinguish between the 'reality' of Persian culture and the Greek literary/artistic construction of it
- Over-generalising Greek attitudes without acknowledging the diversity of the poleis
- Ignoring the role of secondary sources in supporting arguments
- Treating literary sources as purely historical records without considering their context and purpose
Examiner Marking Points
- Understanding of the geographical extent of the Greek world and the autonomy of poleis
- Analysis of Greek unity and disunity during the Persian Wars
- Knowledge of the origin and connotations of the term 'barbarian'
- Understanding of binary oppositions (Greek/foreigner, man/woman, slave/free)
- Analysis of the portrayal of Persians in Aeschylus and Herodotus
- Evaluation of the role of gender in the 'othering' of barbarian characters (Amazons, Medea)
- Knowledge of Achaemenid Persian political and cultural achievements
- Comparison of Greek and Persian perspectives on kingship and imperialism