Invention of the Barbarian (Component) — OCR A-Level Classical Civilisation
In summary: Invention of the Barbarian (Component) is a key topic in OCR A-Level Classical Civilisation. Key exam tip: Ensure equal focus on both literary and visual/material sources.
Exam Tips for Invention of the Barbarian (Component)
- Ensure equal focus on both literary and visual/material sources.
- Use specific examples from the prescribed sources to substantiate arguments in commentary questions.
- In extended essays, explicitly connect the historical context (e.g., the Persian Wars) to the creation of the 'barbarian' image.
- When discussing Medea or the Amazons, consider how gender intersects with the concept of the 'barbarian'.
- Be prepared to evaluate the limitations of the evidence, particularly regarding the fragmentary nature of some sources.
Common Mistakes
- Failing to distinguish between the 'reality' of Persian culture and the 'Greek view' of it.
- Treating the 'barbarian' as a monolithic category rather than a complex, evolving construct.
- Neglecting the visual/material sources in favour of purely literary analysis.
- Over-generalising the extent of Greek unity during the Persian Wars.
- Failing to use secondary scholars and academic works to support arguments in extended responses.
Marking Points
- Knowledge and understanding of the geographical extent of the Greek world and the concept of Greek identity.
- Analysis of the Persian Wars and the role of Greek (dis)unity in Herodotus' narrative.
- Understanding of the origin and connotations of the term 'barbarian' and the use of binary oppositions (e.g., Greek/foreigner, man/woman, slave/free).
- Evaluation of the typical depiction of barbarians in classical Greek sources, including their customs, character, and politics.
- Critical analysis of the portrayal of Persians in Aeschylus' 'The Persians' and Herodotus' 'The Histories'.
- Understanding of the characterisation of Medea as a barbarian and the role of gender in the sense of 'other'.
- Knowledge of the Achaemenid dynasty, Persian political systems, and artistic achievements (e.g., Persepolis, Susa).
- Comparison of Greek and Persian perspectives on kingship and imperialism.
Overview of Invention of the Barbarian (Component)
The 'Invention of the Barbarian' component in OCR A-Level Classical Civilisation explores how ancient Greek and Roman writers constructed the concept of the 'barbarian' as a cultural and ethnic 'other'. This topic examines key texts such as Herodotus' Histories, Euripides' Medea, and Tacitus' Agricola, analysing how these works depict non-Greek and non-Roman peoples—like Persians, Scythians, and Britons—as inferior, savage, or exotic. The term 'barbarian' itself originates from the Greek 'barbaros', meaning someone who does not speak Greek, but it quickly acquired connotations of uncivilised behaviour. Students will investigate how these portrayals served to reinforce Greek and Roman identity, justify imperialism, and explore contemporary anxieties about gender, power, and civilisation.
This topic matters because it reveals the ideological foundations of Western thought about cultural difference and empire. By understanding how the 'barbarian' was invented, students gain insight into the construction of stereotypes and the ways literature can be used to legitimise political agendas. The component also encourages critical thinking about source bias: Herodotus, for example, often presents Persians with a degree of respect, while Euripides uses Medea as a barbarian to challenge Athenian gender norms. Tacitus' depiction of Britons is particularly complex, as he uses them to critique Roman decadence. These nuances are crucial for high-level analysis.
Within the wider A-Level, this component connects to themes of identity, power, and representation. It complements other topics such as 'Imperial Image' or 'Politics of the Late Republic' by providing a framework for understanding how elites used cultural narratives to maintain control. Students will develop skills in literary analysis, historical contextualisation, and evaluation of sources—all essential for the examination.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did the Greeks call non-Greeks 'barbarians'?
The term 'barbarian' comes from the Greek 'barbaros', which originally meant someone who did not speak Greek—their language sounded like 'bar-bar' to Greek ears. Over time, it came to imply cultural inferiority, as Greeks believed their own language and customs were superior. However, the term was not always purely negative; some Greeks admired certain barbarian traits, like Spartan simplicity (though Spartans were Greek). In the context of the Persian Wars, the term became more charged, used to contrast Greek freedom with Persian despotism.
How does Euripides' Medea portray the barbarian?
In Medea, Euripides presents the title character as a barbarian from Colchis, but he subverts stereotypes. Medea is intelligent, passionate, and capable of extreme violence—traits that both align with and challenge Greek views of barbarians as emotional and uncontrolled. Her famous speech about the plight of women (lines 214-266) uses her barbarian status to critique Athenian gender roles. Ultimately, Euripides complicates the barbarian/civilised binary by showing that Medea's 'barbaric' actions (infanticide) are a response to Greek betrayal, raising questions about who is truly civilised.
What is the significance of Tacitus' Agricola for understanding Roman views of barbarians?
Tacitus' Agricola, a biography of his father-in-law who governed Britain, is key for Roman attitudes. It includes a famous speech by the British leader Calgacus, who says 'they make a desert and call it peace'—a critique of Roman imperialism. Tacitus uses the Britons as a mirror to criticise Roman corruption, portraying them as freedom-loving and brave. However, he also justifies conquest by depicting Britons as primitive before Roman civilisation. This dual perspective shows how Roman authors could both admire and denigrate barbarians to serve their own rhetorical purposes.
How did Herodotus depict the Persians in his Histories?
Herodotus' portrayal of Persians is complex. On one hand, he presents them as 'other'—with customs like polygamy and proskynesis (prostration) that Greeks found strange. He also emphasises their despotism under kings like Xerxes. On the other hand, he shows respect for Persian bravery, wisdom (e.g., the debate on government in Book 3), and even critiques Greek stereotypes. For example, he notes that Persians adopt useful customs from other cultures. This nuanced depiction reflects Herodotus' aim to explain both Greek victory and Persian culture to his audience.
What is the 'noble savage' concept in ancient literature?
The 'noble savage' is a modern term for a recurring ancient trope where barbarians are portrayed as uncorrupted, simple, and virtuous compared to civilised societies. Examples include the Scythians in Herodotus, who live without luxury and are praised for their justice, and the Germans in Tacitus' Germania, who are chaste and loyal. This idealisation often served as a critique of Greek or Roman decadence. However, it is still a stereotype—it simplifies and exoticises these groups, ignoring their complexities.
← Back to Classical Civilisation OCR A-Level Specification · All Classical Civilisation Topics