This component explores the political history and thought of the Late Roman Republic from 79 BC to 43 BC. It focuses on the decline of the Republican res p
Topic Synopsis
This component explores the political history and thought of the Late Roman Republic from 79 BC to 43 BC. It focuses on the decline of the Republican res publica and the rise of the Roman Emperors through the study of three key political figures: Cato the Younger, Julius Caesar, and Cicero. The course examines their political beliefs, conduct, and impact, alongside an in-depth study of Cicero's Verrine speeches and selected letters.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Optimates and Populares: Political factions—optimates favoured senatorial authority and traditional elite control; populares used popular assemblies and tribunes to push reforms, often appealing to the plebs and equestrians.
- Tribunician Power and the Gracchi: Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus used the office of tribune to propose land reforms and grain subsidies, challenging senatorial dominance and setting precedents for popular violence.
- The First Triumvirate: An informal political alliance between Pompey, Crassus, and Caesar (60 BCE) that dominated Roman politics, demonstrating how personal ambition could override constitutional norms.
- Military Clientelism: Generals like Marius, Sulla, and Caesar built personal armies loyal to them rather than the state, enabling them to march on Rome and seize power.
- The End of the Republic: The transition from Republic to Empire, marked by Caesar's dictatorship, his assassination, the Second Triumvirate, and Octavian's victory at Actium (31 BCE), leading to the Principate.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Ensure you can define and apply key political terminology such as 'res publica', 'cursus honorum', 'concordia ordinum', and 'cum dignitate otium'.
- When analyzing Cicero's speeches, focus on how rhetorical devices (e.g., anaphora, tricolon, hyperbole) shape the audience's perception of the subject.
- In essays, explicitly integrate the views of secondary scholars to demonstrate a sophisticated level of analysis.
- Practice comparing the different political approaches of Cato, Caesar, and Cicero to show a deep understanding of the period's tensions.
- Use the prescribed sources as the foundation for your arguments, but draw on wider knowledge of the period to substantiate your points.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Failing to link political ideas to the specific historical context of the Late Republic.
- Describing events without evaluating the underlying political motivations or ideologies.
- Neglecting to use secondary scholars or academic views to support arguments in essays.
- Treating Cicero's letters as purely factual historical records without considering their intended audience or rhetorical purpose.
- Over-generalizing the political labels of 'populares' and 'optimates' without acknowledging the complexity of individual political alliances.
Examiner Marking Points
- Knowledge and understanding of Roman social hierarchy (patrician, plebeian, nobiles, equites, novus homo).
- Understanding of the res publica, including the cursus honorum, elections, assemblies, the senate, provincial government, imperium, and dictatorship.
- Analysis of the political ideologies of the populares versus the optimates/boni.
- Evaluation of the roles of patronage, amicitia, inimicitia, idealism, and personal ambition.
- Analysis of Cato the Younger's political stance, his relationship with other figures, and his role as a conservative.
- Analysis of Julius Caesar's political career, his popularis programme, dictatorship, and assassination.
- Analysis of Cicero's political ideals (concordia ordinum, cum dignitate otium) and his career.
- Critical analysis of Cicero's In Verrem 1, including rhetorical devices, themes of corruption and justice, and portrayal of Verres.