This component explores the Greek construction of 'barbarian' identity in contrast to their own, focusing on the Persian Wars, the role of binary oppositio
Topic Synopsis
This component explores the Greek construction of 'barbarian' identity in contrast to their own, focusing on the Persian Wars, the role of binary oppositions, and the portrayal of Persians in literature and art. It examines the historical reality of the Achaemenid Empire versus the Greek perception, including the influence of gender and 'otherness' in these depictions.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Achaemenid administration: The empire was divided into satrapies (provinces) governed by satraps, with a system of roads (e.g., the Royal Road) and couriers for efficient communication and control.
- Persian religion and tolerance: Zoroastrianism was the state religion, but the empire practiced religious tolerance, as seen in Cyrus the Great's treatment of the Jews and the respect for local customs in conquered territories.
- Royal ideology and propaganda: Persian kings used inscriptions (e.g., at Behistun and Naqsh-e Rostam) to legitimise their rule, emphasising their role as restorers of order and their divine favour from Ahura Mazda.
- Military organisation: The Persian army was diverse, including the elite Immortals, cavalry, and conscripts from subject peoples, with a focus on logistics and siege warfare.
- Cultural and economic integration: The empire facilitated trade and cultural exchange across its vast territory, using a common currency (darics) and Aramaic as a lingua franca.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Ensure equal weight is given to the study of literature and visual/material culture.
- Use specific examples from the prescribed visual/material sources to support arguments about the 'invention' of the barbarian.
- When discussing Herodotus, focus on his narrative and literary devices rather than just historical accuracy.
- In extended responses, explicitly link the cultural context of the production of the source to its content.
- Practice comparing the depictions of Persians in Aeschylus and Herodotus.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Failing to distinguish between the 'reality' of Persian culture and the 'invented' Greek perception.
- Over-generalising the Greek view of barbarians without acknowledging nuances or variations in sources.
- Neglecting the role of visual/material sources in the analysis of the barbarian image.
- Treating the Persian Wars as a monolithic event rather than a complex series of relations and responses.
- Failing to use secondary scholars to support arguments in extended responses.
Examiner Marking Points
- Understanding of the geographical extent of the Greek world and the autonomy of poleis.
- Analysis of Greek unity and disunity during the Persian Wars, including the concept of 'medising'.
- Knowledge of the origin and connotations of the term 'barbarian' and the use of binary oppositions (Greek/foreigner, man/woman, slave/free).
- Evaluation of the role of the Persian Wars in crystallising images of foreign peoples.
- Analysis of the portrayal of Persians in Aeschylus' 'The Persians' and Herodotus' 'The Histories'.
- Understanding of the Achaemenid political system, including the king, satrapies, and tribute.
- Comparison of the 'reality' of Persian culture (e.g., Persepolis, Cyrus Cylinder) with the Greek view.
- Analysis of gendered 'otherness' through the figures of Amazons and Medea.