Food marketing and advertising.

    OCR
    GCSE

    The study of food marketing and advertising requires a critical examination of the psychological, sensory, and commercial strategies employed by manufacturers to influence consumer behaviour. Candidates must analyse the tension between commercial profitability and public health, specifically regarding the promotion of High Fat, Sugar, and Salt (HFSS) products. The scope encompasses the evolution from traditional media to algorithmic social media targeting, the regulatory role of the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), and the ethical implications of targeting vulnerable demographics such as children. Mastery involves evaluating how marketing techniques contribute to the obesogenic environment.

    0
    Objectives
    4
    Exam Tips
    4
    Pitfalls
    3
    Key Terms
    4
    Mark Points

    What You Need to Demonstrate

    Key skills and knowledge for this topic

    • Award marks for precise identification of marketing methods: BOGOF, celebrity endorsement, product placement, and loyalty schemes.
    • Credit analysis that links marketing techniques to specific target demographics (e.g., use of bright colours/cartoons for pester power).
    • Responses must distinguish between statutory labelling (allergens, quantity) and voluntary marketing claims (low fat, high fibre).
    • Higher tariff responses must evaluate the ethical implications of marketing high-sugar/fat foods to vulnerable groups in relation to the Eatwell Guide.

    Marking Points

    Key points examiners look for in your answers

    • Award marks for precise identification of marketing methods: BOGOF, celebrity endorsement, product placement, and loyalty schemes.
    • Credit analysis that links marketing techniques to specific target demographics (e.g., use of bright colours/cartoons for pester power).
    • Responses must distinguish between statutory labelling (allergens, quantity) and voluntary marketing claims (low fat, high fibre).
    • Higher tariff responses must evaluate the ethical implications of marketing high-sugar/fat foods to vulnerable groups in relation to the Eatwell Guide.

    Examiner Tips

    Expert advice for maximising your marks

    • 💡When evaluating packaging, explicitly reference the 'Traffic Light' system and Reference Intakes (RIs) to support arguments.
    • 💡For 'Discuss' questions, ensure arguments cover both the commercial benefit to the manufacturer and the health impact on the consumer.
    • 💡Allocate 1 minute per mark; ensure 8-10 mark questions include a concluding judgement to access the top band.
    • 💡Use specific terminology such as 'target demographic', 'ethical marketing', and 'nutritional profile' rather than general terms.

    Common Mistakes

    Pitfalls to avoid in your exam answers

    • Confusing 'Best Before' (quality indicator) with 'Use By' (safety limit) when discussing packaging regulations.
    • Providing generic assertions (e.g., 'it makes people buy it') rather than explaining the psychological mechanism (e.g., 'brand loyalty', 'perceived value').
    • Failing to differentiate between 'reduced fat' (relative to original product) and 'low fat' (legal absolute definition).
    • Describing the product's sensory qualities (organoleptics) instead of the packaging's persuasive features.

    Key Terminology

    Essential terms to know

    Likely Command Words

    How questions on this topic are typically asked

    State
    Describe
    Explain
    Discuss
    Evaluate
    Justify
    Assess

    Ready to test yourself?

    Practice questions tailored to this topic