AQA · A-Level · Biology

    Course version: 7402 · Version from Sept 2016

    Students should be able to evaluate information relating to screening…

    Full specification wording

    Differences in DNA between individuals of the same species can be exploited: Students should be able to evaluate information relating to screening individuals for genetically determined conditions and drug responses.

    Evaluating genetic screening involves weighing benefits against limitations.

    Checked against the AQA 7402 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 4 of 4

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    Evaluating genetic screening involves weighing benefits against limitations. For genetically determined conditions, screening allows early intervention, like increased monitoring for BRCA1 carriers. For drug responses, screening inherited alleles guides effective dosages and reduces adverse reactions. For example, screening TPMT alleles prevents severe toxicity when using thiopurine drugs. However, limitations exist: tests only detect known mutations, so a negative result cannot entirely rule out a condition. For multifactorial conditions, a risk allele only raises the probability of disease, as environmental factors also contribute. Additionally, false positives cause needless anxiety, while false negatives provide false reassurance.

    What earns the marks

    • A benefit of screening, such as early detection allowing preventative treatment or increased monitoring before symptoms develop.
    • Explaining that screening for inherited alleles affecting drug responses can guide effective dosages and reduce adverse reactions.
    • Stating that screening detects only known mutations, so a negative result does not completely rule out the condition.
    • Explaining that in multifactorial conditions a risk allele raises probability rather than guaranteeing disease, because environmental factors contribute.
    • Recognising that false positives cause unnecessary anxiety or treatment, and false negatives give false reassurance.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Listing only advantages when the command word is evaluate.

      Put it right: Marks for limitations must also be included to access full credit.

    • Writing that a screening test 'tells you whether you will get the disease' for multifactorial conditions, instead of stating it increases risk or probability.

    • Using somatic tumour markers (like HER2) as examples of screening individuals for inherited genetic conditions, rather than inherited alleles like TPMT or BRCA1.

    Exam tips

    • Structure evaluation answers with points for, points against, and a justified conclusion tied to the provided data.
    • Use the words probability and risk rather than cause when writing about multifactorial conditions.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the Differences in DNA between individuals of the same species can be exploited: Students should be able to evaluate information relating to screening individuals for genetically determined conditions and drug responses. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    Which statement best describes what is meant by genetic screening?

    Listen

    Evaluating genetic screening involves weighing benefits against limitations. For genetically determined conditions, screening allows early intervention, like increased monitoring for BRCA1 carriers. For drug responses, screening inherited alleles guides effective dosages and reduces adverse reactions. For example, screening TPMT alleles prevents severe toxicity when using thiopurine drugs. However, limitations exist: tests only detect known mutations, so a negative result cannot entirely rule out a condition. For multifactorial conditions, a risk allele only raises the probability of disease, as environmental factors also contribute. Additionally, false positives cause needless anxiety, while false negatives provide false reassurance. A strong answer earns marks for these points. a benefit of screening, such as early detection allowing preventative treatment or increased monitoring before symptoms develop. explaining that screening for inherited alleles affecting drug responses can guide effective dosages and reduce adverse reactions. stating that screening detects only known mutations, so a negative result does not completely rule out the condition. explaining that in multifactorial conditions a risk allele raises probability rather than guaranteeing disease, because environmental factors contribute. Exam tip: Structure evaluation answers with points for, points against, and a justified conclusion tied to the provided data.

    See it

    A flowchart starting from a single node, Screening individuals, which branches into two uses: Genetically determined conditions and Drug responses. From Genetically determined conditions, three nodes branch out: Benefits, listing early intervention and increased monitoring; Limitations, stating that only known mutations are detected and a negative result cannot rule out the condition; and Multifactorial conditions, where a risk allele raises probability. From Drug responses, one node branches out: Benefits, listing guidance of effective dosages and reduction of adverse reactions. Two further nodes branch directly from Screening individuals: False positives, causing needless anxiety, and False negatives, giving false reassurance.
    It shows the two uses of genetic screening and the benefits and limitations to weigh when evaluating them.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A flowchart starting from a single node, Screening individuals, which branches into two uses: Genetically determined conditions and Drug responses. From Genetically determined conditions, three nodes branch out: Benefits, listing early intervention and increased monitoring; Limitations, stating that only known mutations are detected and a negative result cannot rule out the condition; and Multifactorial conditions, where a risk allele raises probability. From Drug responses, one node branches out: Benefits, listing guidance of effective dosages and reduction of adverse reactions. Two further nodes branch directly from Screening individuals: False positives, causing needless anxiety, and False negatives, giving false reassurance.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of Differences in DNA between individuals of the same species can be exploited: Students should be able to evaluate information relating to screening individuals for genetically determined conditions and drug responses.

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge