AQA · A-Level · Biology
Course version: 7402 · Version from Sept 2016
Students should be able to: analyse and interpret data relating to…
Full specification wording
Mass transport in animals: Students should be able to: analyse and interpret data relating to pressure and volume changes during the cardiac cycle analyse and interpret data associated with specific risk factors and the incidence of cardiovascular disease evaluate conflicting evidence associated with risk factors affecting cardiovascular disease recognise correlations and causal relationships.
This statement focuses on data handling.
Checked against the AQA 7402 specification (opens in a new tab) on .
- Point 13 of 14
- 4 key terms
Study notes
From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.
The idea
This statement focuses on data handling. For the cardiac cycle, interpret both pressure and volume changes; for example, ventricular volume decreases when ventricular pressure exceeds aortic pressure, forcing blood out. When analysing cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence, distinguish correlation (variables changing together) from causation. Strong epidemiological data combined with a biological mechanism (e.g., high blood pressure damaging endothelium) supports causal links. You must evaluate conflicting evidence by comparing study designs, sample sizes, and control variables. Standard deviations show the spread of data around a mean; they are not a formal significance test. Non-overlapping standard deviation bars suggest a difference is unlikely to be due to chance, but overlapping bars do not rule out a significant difference. A statistical test is needed to establish significance.
What earns the marks
- Quote figures with units from the data to support statements about pressure, volume, or CVD incidence.
- State that non-overlapping standard deviation bars suggest a difference is unlikely to be due to chance, but note that a statistical test is needed to confirm significance.
- Identify a named variable as a risk factor rather than a definitive cause when only a correlation is shown.
- Evaluate conflicting evidence by identifying limitations, such as small sample sizes, lack of control groups, or differing methodologies between studies.
- Calculate heart rate using the duration of one cardiac cycle from a pressure or volume trace (e.g., 60 / cycle duration in seconds).
Common mistakes and how to put them right
Concluding that a risk factor causes a disease when data only show a correlation.
Put it right: State that the data show a correlation and suggest another variable might be responsible unless a causal mechanism is proven.
Ignoring volume changes and focusing only on pressure during the cardiac cycle.
Put it right: Track both; remember that ventricular volume falls rapidly when the semilunar valves open.
Stating a difference is significant based only on standard deviation bars.
Put it right: Standard deviation bars indicate spread; non-overlap suggests a difference is unlikely to be due to chance, but a statistical test is required to claim significance.
Dismissing conflicting evidence simply because studies are different.
Put it right: Specify exactly why studies conflict, such as differences in sample demographics, study duration, or uncontrolled variables.
Exam tips
- Answer evaluation questions systematically: state what the data show using figures, what they do not show, and what further information (like a statistical test) is needed.
- When identifying valve events on a graph, look for the exact points where pressure curves cross; this is where valves open or close, triggering volume changes.
Try the lesson
The start of the Mass transport in animals: Students should be able to: analyse and interpret data relating to pressure and volume changes during the cardiac cycle analyse and interpret data associated with specific risk factors and the incidence of cardiovascular disease evaluate conflicting evidence associated with risk factors affecting cardiovascular disease recognise correlations and causal relationships. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.
Have a go first
A student recorded the volume of blood in the left ventricle of a healthy adult at four points in the cardiac cycle. The results are shown in the table.
| Point | Stage of cardiac cycle | Ventricular volume / cm³ |
|---|---|---|
| P | Atrial systole, before the atrioventricular valves close | 130 |
| Q | Ventricular systole, semilunar valves open | 90 |
| R | Ventricular systole, semilunar valves just closed | 55 |
| S | Ventricular diastole, atrioventricular valves open | 80 |
Using the data, what is the stroke volume of the left ventricle?
Listen
This statement focuses on data handling. For the cardiac cycle, interpret both pressure and volume changes; for example, ventricular volume decreases when ventricular pressure exceeds aortic pressure, forcing blood out. When analysing cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence, distinguish correlation (variables changing together) from causation. Strong epidemiological data combined with a biological mechanism (e.g., high blood pressure damaging endothelium) supports causal links. You must evaluate conflicting evidence by comparing study designs, sample sizes, and control variables. Standard deviations show the spread of data around a mean; they are not a formal significance test. Non-overlapping standard deviation bars suggest a difference is unlikely to be due to chance, but overlapping bars do not rule out a significant difference. A statistical test is needed to establish significance. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Quote figures with units from the data to support statements about pressure, volume, or CVD incidence. State that non-overlapping standard deviation bars suggest a difference is unlikely to be due to chance, but note that a statistical test is needed to confirm significance. Identify a named variable as a risk factor rather than a definitive cause when only a correlation is shown. Evaluate conflicting evidence by identifying limitations, such as small sample sizes, lack of control groups, or differing methodologies between studies. A common slip: Concluding that a risk factor causes a disease when data only show a correlation. Instead, State that the data show a correlation and suggest another variable might be responsible unless a causal mechanism is proven. Exam tip: Answer evaluation questions systematically: state what the data show using figures, what they do not show, and what further information (like a statistical test) is needed.
Key words
Say what each word means before you turn the card.
Correlation
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
Causation
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
Standard deviations
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
Conflicting evidence
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
See every definition
- Correlation
- Variables changing together, which must be distinguished from causation when analysing data on the incidence of cardiovascular disease.
- Causation
- A causal link is supported by strong epidemiological data combined with a biological mechanism, such as high blood pressure damaging endothelium.
- Standard deviations
- They show the spread of data around a mean and are not a formal significance test.
- Conflicting evidence
- Evaluated by comparing study designs, sample sizes, and control variables, and by identifying limitations such as small sample sizes, lack of control groups, or differing methodologies between studies.
There is more to this lesson
The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge
Test your understanding of Mass transport in animals: Students should be able to: analyse and interpret data relating to pressure and volume changes during the cardiac cycle analyse and interpret data associated with specific risk factors and the incidence of cardiovascular disease evaluate conflicting evidence associated with risk factors affecting cardiovascular disease recognise correlations and causal relationships.
Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge