AQA · A-Level · History

    Course version: 7042 · Version from Sept 2017

    Relations of the Crusader states with the Byzantine Empire, the Latin…

    Full specification wording

    1A The Age of the Crusades, c1071–1204 – The foundation of new states and the Second Crusade, c1099–1149: Relations of the Crusader states with the Byzantine Empire, the Latin West, the Muslim Near East and indigenous peoples

    The Crusader states relied on complex diplomatic and military relations to survive.

    Checked against the AQA 7042 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 3 of 6

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    The Crusader states relied on complex diplomatic and military relations to survive. Relations with the Byzantine Empire fluctuated between alliance and hostility, exemplified by John II Comnenus asserting suzerainty over Antioch in 1137. Ties with the Latin West were vital for manpower and financial aid, often secured through papal appeals and the establishment of military orders. Interactions with the Muslim Near East were pragmatic; despite ideological enmity, truces and alliances of convenience were common, such as the 1108 alliance between Tancred of Antioch and Ridwan of Aleppo against fellow Christians and Muslims. Internally, the Franks ruled as a minority, adopting a pragmatic approach towards indigenous peoples, allowing religious freedom for taxation.

    What earns the marks

    • Evaluate the shifting alliances between the Crusader states and the Byzantine Empire, particularly regarding the contested control of Antioch.
    • Analyse the dependency of Outremer on the Latin West for military reinforcements, financial support, and the recruitment of crusaders.
    • Assess the pragmatic nature of Frankish-Muslim relations, highlighting instances of trade, truces, and cross-faith military alliances.
    • Explain the administrative policies used to govern indigenous populations, focusing on taxation and religious tolerance.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Assuming relations with the Muslim Near East were purely hostile.

      Put it right: Acknowledge the frequent pragmatic truces and alliances of convenience between Franks and Muslim rulers.

    • Overstating the level of support from the Latin West.

      Put it right: Recognise that Western aid was often sporadic and insufficient to meet the constant defensive needs of Outremer.

    • Believing indigenous populations were forcibly converted to Latin Christianity.

      Put it right: Understand that Franks allowed indigenous Muslims and Eastern Christians to maintain their own religious practices to ensure economic stability.

    Exam tips

    • Use specific examples of cross-faith alliances, such as the Battle of Tell Bashir, to demonstrate the pragmatic nature of Crusader diplomacy.
    • Contrast the theoretical ideology of the Crusades with the practical realities of governing a minority settler state in the Levant.
    • When evaluating Byzantine relations, explicitly mention the Treaty of Devol or the campaigns of John II Comnenus to provide concrete evidence.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the 1A The Age of the Crusades, c1071–1204 – The foundation of new states and the Second Crusade, c1099–1149: Relations of the Crusader states with the Byzantine Empire, the Latin West, the Muslim Near East and indigenous peoples lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    How did the Crusader states generally manage their relations with the indigenous Muslim and Eastern Christian populations in the early 12th century?

    Listen

    The Crusader states relied on complex diplomatic and military relations to survive. Relations with the Byzantine Empire fluctuated between alliance and hostility, exemplified by John II Comnenus asserting suzerainty over Antioch in 1137. Ties with the Latin West were vital for manpower and financial aid, often secured through papal appeals and the establishment of military orders. Interactions with the Muslim Near East were pragmatic; despite ideological enmity, truces and alliances of convenience were common, such as the 1108 alliance between Tancred of Antioch and Ridwan of Aleppo against fellow Christians and Muslims. Internally, the Franks ruled as a minority, adopting a pragmatic approach towards indigenous peoples, allowing religious freedom for taxation. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Evaluate the shifting alliances between the Crusader states and the Byzantine Empire, particularly regarding the contested control of Antioch. Analyse the dependency of Outremer on the Latin West for military reinforcements, financial support, and the recruitment of crusaders. Assess the pragmatic nature of Frankish-Muslim relations, highlighting instances of trade, truces, and cross-faith military alliances. Explain the administrative policies used to govern indigenous populations, focusing on taxation and religious tolerance. A common slip: Assuming relations with the Muslim Near East were purely hostile. Instead, acknowledge the frequent pragmatic truces and alliances of convenience between Franks and Muslim rulers. Exam tip: Use specific examples of cross-faith alliances, such as the Battle of Tell Bashir, to demonstrate the pragmatic nature of Crusader diplomacy.

    See it

    A top-down flowchart. The top node is 'Crusader states', branching into four nodes: 'Byzantine Empire', 'Latin West', 'Muslim Near East' and 'Indigenous peoples'. From 'Byzantine Empire' a node reads 'Relations fluctuate between alliance and hostility', leading to 'John II Comnenus asserts suzerainty over Antioch in 1137'. From 'Latin West' a node reads 'Manpower and financial aid', leading to 'Papal appeals and military orders'. From 'Muslim Near East' a node reads 'Pragmatic truces and alliances of convenience', leading to '1108 alliance of Tancred of Antioch and Ridwan of Aleppo'. From 'Indigenous peoples' a single node reads 'Pragmatic approach allowing religious freedom for taxation'.
    It shows the four sets of relations of the Crusader states and the key features of each.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A top-down flowchart. The top node is 'Crusader states', branching into four nodes: 'Byzantine Empire', 'Latin West', 'Muslim Near East' and 'Indigenous peoples'. From 'Byzantine Empire' a node reads 'Relations fluctuate between alliance and hostility', leading to 'John II Comnenus asserts suzerainty over Antioch in 1137'. From 'Latin West' a node reads 'Manpower and financial aid', leading to 'Papal appeals and military orders'. From 'Muslim Near East' a node reads 'Pragmatic truces and alliances of convenience', leading to '1108 alliance of Tancred of Antioch and Ridwan of Aleppo'. From 'Indigenous peoples' a single node reads 'Pragmatic approach allowing religious freedom for taxation'.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of 1A The Age of the Crusades, c1071–1204 – The foundation of new states and the Second Crusade, c1099–1149: Relations of the Crusader states with the Byzantine Empire, the Latin West, the Muslim Near East and indigenous peoples

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge