Pearson Edexcel · A-Level · History

    Course version: 9HI0 · Version from Sept 2015

    The contribution of other nations to the outbreak of war.

    Full specification wording

    How far was Hitler’s foreign policy responsible for the Second World War?: The contribution of other nations to the outbreak of war.

    While Germany bore primary responsibility for the outbreak of war in 1939, other nations contributed through their actions and inactions.

    Checked against the Pearson Edexcel 9HI0 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 4 of 4
    • 3 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    While Germany bore primary responsibility for the outbreak of war in 1939, other nations contributed through their actions and inactions. Britain and France pursued appeasement, notably at Munich in 1938, which encouraged Hitler to believe further expansion would go unchallenged. The USSR signed the Nazi-Soviet Pact in August 1939, removing a potential eastern front and enabling the invasion of Poland. Italy, though initially cautious, signed the Pact of Steel in May 1939, aligning itself with Germany. Japan's earlier expansionism in Manchuria and China diverted international attention and undermined the League of Nations. The USA remained isolationist, passing Neutrality Acts that limited early opposition. Thus, the war resulted from a complex interplay of German aggression and the policies of other powers.

    What earns the marks

    • Explains how British and French appeasement, especially the Munich Agreement, emboldened Hitler and weakened collective security.
    • Analyses the Soviet decision to sign the Nazi-Soviet Pact, including Stalin's security concerns and the secret protocol dividing eastern Europe.
    • Assesses Italy's role through the Pact of Steel and its foreign policy ambitions, which reinforced the Axis but did not commit Italy to immediate war.
    • Discusses the impact of US isolationism and the 1930s Neutrality Acts in limiting early opposition to German expansion.
    • Evaluates Japan's expansionism in Manchuria and China as a factor that undermined the League of Nations and distracted other powers.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Claiming that appeasement caused the war directly.

      Put it right: It was a contributing factor that shaped Hitler's perceptions, but German aggression remained the primary driver.

    • Overstating Soviet responsibility by ignoring Stalin's security dilemma.

      Put it right: The Nazi-Soviet Pact was a pragmatic move, not an ideological alliance, and should be explained in context.

    • Assuming the USA was entirely uninvolved.

      Put it right: While isolationist and bound by Neutrality Acts, President Roosevelt's moral condemnations and naval rearmament showed growing concern, even if direct intervention was avoided before 1939.

    Exam tips

    • Avoid a narrative of the 1930s; instead, select specific actions of other nations and analyse their consequences for Hitler's decision-making.
    • Use terms like 'collective security', 'appeasement', and 'isolationism' accurately and explain their significance.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the How far was Hitler’s foreign policy responsible for the Second World War?: The contribution of other nations to the outbreak of war. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    How did the Soviet Union contribute to the outbreak of war in September 1939?

    Listen

    While Germany bore primary responsibility for the outbreak of war in 1939, other nations contributed through their actions and inactions. Britain and France pursued appeasement, notably at Munich in 1938, which encouraged Hitler to believe further expansion would go unchallenged. The USSR signed the Nazi-Soviet Pact in August 1939, removing a potential eastern front and enabling the invasion of Poland. Italy, though initially cautious, signed the Pact of Steel in May 1939, aligning itself with Germany. Japan's earlier expansionism in Manchuria and China diverted international attention and undermined the League of Nations. The USA remained isolationist, passing Neutrality Acts that limited early opposition. Thus, the war resulted from a complex interplay of German aggression and the policies of other powers. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Explains how British and French appeasement, especially the Munich Agreement, emboldened Hitler and weakened collective security. Analyses the Soviet decision to sign the Nazi-Soviet Pact, including Stalin's security concerns and the secret protocol dividing eastern Europe. Assesses Italy's role through the Pact of Steel and its foreign policy ambitions, which reinforced the Axis but did not commit Italy to immediate war. Discusses the impact of US isolationism and the 1930s Neutrality Acts in limiting early opposition to German expansion. A common slip: Claiming that appeasement caused the war directly. Instead, it was a contributing factor that shaped Hitler's perceptions, but German aggression remained the primary driver. Exam tip: Avoid a narrative of the 1930s; instead, select specific actions of other nations and analyse their consequences for Hitler's decision-making.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Appeasement and collective security

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    The Nazi-Soviet Pact and Soviet pragmatism

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Axis alignment and American isolationism

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Appeasement and collective security
    Britain and France pursued a policy of appeasement, notably at Munich in 1938, which encouraged Hitler to believe further expansion would go unchallenged and weakened collective security.
    The Nazi-Soviet Pact and Soviet pragmatism
    The USSR signed the Nazi-Soviet Pact in August 1939, a pragmatic move removing a potential eastern front and enabling the invasion of Poland.
    Axis alignment and American isolationism
    Italy signed the Pact of Steel in May 1939, aligning itself with Germany, while the USA remained isolationist, passing Neutrality Acts that limited early opposition.

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of How far was Hitler’s foreign policy responsible for the Second World War?: The contribution of other nations to the outbreak of war.

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge