Pearson Edexcel · A-Level · History

    Course version: 9HI0 · Version from Sept 2015

    Protest, agitation and parliamentary reform in Britain, c1780–1928 - 4 The…

    Full specification wording

    Paper 3, Option 36.1: Protest, agitation and parliamentary reform in Britain, c1780–1928 - 4 The Women’s Social and Political Union, 1903–14: WSPU organisation and tactics; extent of support; the reasons for, and impact of, increased militancy after 1908.

    This topic examines the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU), founded in 1903 by Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughters.

    Checked against the Pearson Edexcel 9HI0 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 1 of 3
    • 4 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    This topic examines the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU), founded in 1903 by Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughters. It analyses the WSPU’s organisational structure, including its centralised leadership and paid organisers, and its tactics such as demonstrations, window-breaking, and arson. It considers the extent of support, from mass meetings to criticism from other suffragists. It explores why militancy increased after 1908, including frustration with government inaction and the influence of Christabel Pankhurst. Finally, it assesses the impact of militancy, such as publicity, imprisonment, force-feeding, and the eventual granting of partial suffrage in 1918.

    What earns the marks

    • Describes WSPU organisation: centralised control by the Pankhursts, paid staff, and local branches.
    • Explains WSPU tactics: constitutional methods initially, then civil disobedience and violence after 1908.
    • Assesses the extent of support: large demonstrations, but also opposition from non-militant suffragists and the public.
    • Analyses reasons for increased militancy after 1908: government refusal to grant women the vote, the 'Cat and Mouse' Act, and leadership decisions.
    • Evaluates the impact of militancy: raised public awareness, but also alienated some supporters and delayed conciliation.
    • Discusses the role of key figures: Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst, and the Women’s Freedom League split.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Stating that all suffragettes were violent.

      Put it right: Distinguish between the WSPU’s militant wing and the non-militant suffragists of the NUWSS.

    • Claiming that militancy directly caused the 1918 Representation of the People Act.

      Put it right: Recognise the impact of women’s war work and changing political climate as equally important.

    • Ignoring the extent of support beyond London.

      Put it right: Include examples of WSPU activities and branches across the UK.

    Exam tips

    • Use specific examples of WSPU tactics and their consequences to support arguments.
    • Compare the WSPU with other suffrage societies to assess the extent of support.
    • When evaluating impact, consider short-term and long-term effects, and different perspectives.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the Paper 3, Option 36.1: Protest, agitation and parliamentary reform in Britain, c1780–1928 - 4 The Women’s Social and Political Union, 1903–14: WSPU organisation and tactics; extent of support; the reasons for, and impact of, increased militancy after 1908. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    What was the primary characteristic of the organisational structure of the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU) under Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst?

    Listen

    This topic examines the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU), founded in 1903 by Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughters. It analyses the WSPU’s organisational structure, including its centralised leadership and paid organisers, and its tactics such as demonstrations, window-breaking, and arson. It considers the extent of support, from mass meetings to criticism from other suffragists. It explores why militancy increased after 1908, including frustration with government inaction and the influence of Christabel Pankhurst. Finally, it assesses the impact of militancy, such as publicity, imprisonment, force-feeding, and the eventual granting of partial suffrage in 1918. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Describes WSPU organisation: centralised control by the Pankhursts, paid staff, and local branches. Explains WSPU tactics: constitutional methods initially, then civil disobedience and violence after 1908. Assesses the extent of support: large demonstrations, but also opposition from non-militant suffragists and the public. Analyses reasons for increased militancy after 1908: government refusal to grant women the vote, the 'Cat and Mouse' Act, and leadership decisions. A common slip: stating that all suffragettes were violent. Instead, distinguish between the WSPU’s militant wing and the non-militant suffragists of the NUWSS. Exam tip: Use specific examples of WSPU tactics and their consequences to support arguments.

    Put the events in order

    Put these events in the order they happened, earliest first.

    1. 1. Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughters founded the WSPU
    2. 2. Partial suffrage granted to women
    3. 3. Militancy increased after this point

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    WSPU

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Militancy

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Extent of support

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Impact of militancy

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    WSPU
    Organisation founded in 1903 by Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughters, with a centralised structure, paid organisers and local branches.
    Militancy
    Tactics of civil disobedience and violence, such as window-breaking and arson, which increased after 1908.
    Extent of support
    Range from mass meetings and large demonstrations to opposition from non-militant suffragists and the public.
    Impact of militancy
    Raised public awareness but also alienated some supporters and delayed conciliation, alongside imprisonment and force-feeding.

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of Paper 3, Option 36.1: Protest, agitation and parliamentary reform in Britain, c1780–1928 - 4 The Women’s Social and Political Union, 1903–14: WSPU organisation and tactics; extent of support; the reasons for, and impact of, increased militancy after 1908.

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge