Pearson Edexcel · A-Level · History
Course version: 9HI0 · Version from Sept 2015
The changing nature of warfare, 1859–1991: perception and reality - 3…
Full specification wording
Paper 3, Option 37.1: The changing nature of warfare, 1859–1991: perception and reality - 3 Radios, the internal combustion engine and mobile warfare, 1917–1940: The impact of these new technologies on German planning in the 1930s; the role of Guderian as theorist of Blitzkrieg; the attack on France in 1940 and roles of Guderian and Rommel.
This topic examines how radios and the internal combustion engine shaped German military planning in the 1930s, how Guderian theorised Blitzkrieg, and how Guderian and Rommel applied it in the…
Checked against the Pearson Edexcel 9HI0 specification (opens in a new tab) on .
- Point 3 of 3
- 4 key terms
Study notes
From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.
The idea
This topic examines how radios and the internal combustion engine shaped German military planning in the 1930s, how Guderian theorised Blitzkrieg, and how Guderian and Rommel applied it in the 1940 attack on France. In the 1930s, Germany integrated radio sets into tanks and command vehicles, enabling real-time coordination, while motorised and armoured formations exploited engine power for speed and concentration. Guderian, drawing on British theorists, argued that tanks should be massed in independent Panzer divisions with all-arms support, advancing relentlessly via radio command. In May 1940, Guderian's XIX Panzer Corps drove through the Ardennes to the Channel, while Rommel's 7th Panzer Division raced ahead, creating confusion. Their roles show how technology and theory combined in practice, though success also depended on enemy responses and logistics.
What earns the marks
- Explains how radio communication allowed German commanders to control fast-moving armoured formations in the 1930s, moving beyond flags and messengers.
- Analyses how the internal combustion engine enabled tanks, motorised infantry and supply columns to sustain rapid advances, as in the drive to the Channel in 1940.
- Assesses Guderian's theoretical contribution: massing tanks in Panzer divisions, combining arms, and using radio to direct concentrated blows.
- Evaluates Guderian's and Rommel's roles in the attack on France in 1940, including Guderian's XIX Panzer Corps through the Ardennes and Rommel's 7th Panzer Division's rapid advance.
- Considers limitations: logistics, infantry support, and the role of Allied decisions in enabling German success.
Common mistakes and how to put them right
Treating Blitzkrieg as a single, fully formed doctrine before 1939.
Put it right: Show it developed through debate and experimentation in the 1930s.
Assuming technology alone won the 1940 campaign.
Put it right by linking technology to planning, training and enemy responses.
Confusing Guderian's and Rommel's roles.
Put it right by specifying Guderian's corps-level command and Rommel's divisional command.
Exam tips
- Use precise examples such as the Meuse crossing and the dash to the Channel to illustrate technology and roles.
- Link each technological feature to a planning or command outcome, not just describe the technology.
- Compare Guderian's theoretical writings with his and Rommel's operational actions to show theory in practice.
Try the lesson
The start of the Paper 3, Option 37.1: The changing nature of warfare, 1859–1991: perception and reality - 3 Radios, the internal combustion engine and mobile warfare, 1917–1940: The impact of these new technologies on German planning in the 1930s; the role of Guderian as theorist of Blitzkrieg; the attack on France in 1940 and roles of Guderian and Rommel. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.
Have a go first
Which German officer is most closely associated with developing the theory of Blitzkrieg in the 1930s?
Listen
This topic examines how radios and the internal combustion engine shaped German military planning in the 1930s, how Guderian theorised Blitzkrieg, and how Guderian and Rommel applied it in the 1940 attack on France. In the 1930s, Germany integrated radio sets into tanks and command vehicles, enabling real-time coordination, while motorised and armoured formations exploited engine power for speed and concentration. Guderian, drawing on British theorists, argued that tanks should be massed in independent Panzer divisions with all-arms support, advancing relentlessly via radio command. In May 1940, Guderian's XIX Panzer Corps drove through the Ardennes to the Channel, while Rommel's 7th Panzer Division raced ahead, creating confusion. Their roles show how technology and theory combined in practice, though success also depended on enemy responses and logistics. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Explains how radio communication allowed German commanders to control fast-moving armoured formations in the 1930s, moving beyond flags and messengers. Analyses how the internal combustion engine enabled tanks, motorised infantry and supply columns to sustain rapid advances, as in the drive to the Channel in 1940. Assesses Guderian's theoretical contribution: massing tanks in Panzer divisions, combining arms, and using radio to direct concentrated blows. Evaluates Guderian's and Rommel's roles in the attack on France in 1940, including Guderian's XIX Panzer Corps through the Ardennes and Rommel's 7th Panzer Division's rapid advance. A common slip: Treating Blitzkrieg as a single, fully formed doctrine before 1939. Instead, show it developed through debate and experimentation in the 1930s. Exam tip: Use precise examples such as the Meuse crossing and the dash to the Channel to illustrate technology and roles.
Key words
Say what each word means before you turn the card.
Technology and doctrine
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
Command and control
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
Combined arms warfare
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
Theory and practice
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
See every definition
- Technology and doctrine
- Radios and the internal combustion engine shaped German military planning in the 1930s, while Blitzkrieg developed through debate and experimentation rather than as a single, fully formed doctrine before 1939.
- Command and control
- Radio sets integrated into tanks and command vehicles enabled real-time coordination, allowing German commanders to control fast-moving armoured formations beyond flags and messengers.
- Combined arms warfare
- Guderian argued that tanks should be massed in independent Panzer divisions with all-arms support, combining arms and using radio to direct concentrated blows.
- Theory and practice
- Guderian's theoretical writings can be compared with his and Rommel's operational actions in the 1940 attack on France to show theory in practice.
There is more to this lesson
The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge
Test your understanding of Paper 3, Option 37.1: The changing nature of warfare, 1859–1991: perception and reality - 3 Radios, the internal combustion engine and mobile warfare, 1917–1940: The impact of these new technologies on German planning in the 1930s; the role of Guderian as theorist of Blitzkrieg; the attack on France in 1940 and roles of Guderian and Rommel.
Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge