Pearson Edexcel · A-Level · History

    Course version: 9HI0 · Version from Sept 2015

    The making of modern Russia, 1855–1991 - 1 The political reforms of…

    Full specification wording

    Paper 3, Option 38.1: The making of modern Russia, 1855–1991 - 1 The political reforms of Alexander II, 1855–70: The impact of the Crimean War; impetus to reform; army reforms, including to training, weapons, promotions, the period of conscription and to military bureaucracy.

    Defeat in the Crimean War (1853–56) exposed Russia's backwardness: the Allies' rifled muskets and steam transport outmatched smoothbore weapons and ox-drawn supply, and the Treaty of Paris (1856)…

    Checked against the Pearson Edexcel 9HI0 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 1 of 3
    • 3 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    Defeat in the Crimean War (1853–56) exposed Russia's backwardness: the Allies' rifled muskets and steam transport outmatched smoothbore weapons and ox-drawn supply, and the Treaty of Paris (1856) ended Black Sea naval presence. This humiliation gave Alexander II the impetus to reform, since serfdom and military rigidity were blamed. War Minister Milyutin's army reforms (1860s–70s) shortened conscription from 25 years to 6 years active plus 9 reserve, made service universal in principle, improved training and officer promotion by merit, introduced rifled weapons, and reorganised military bureaucracy into districts. Assess impact, impetus and each reform strand.

    What earns the marks

    • Explains how Crimean defeat exposed logistical, technological and administrative weakness, giving impetus to reform.
    • Analyses Milyutin's reforms: reduced conscription term, universal liability, reserve system and their social effects.
    • Evaluates changes to training, rifled weapons and promotion by merit, and their limits in practice.
    • Assesses reform of military bureaucracy, including district organisation and its effect on efficiency.
    • Judges relative significance of military reform against other pressures for change under Alexander II.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Treating the Crimean War as a victory.

      Put it right by stating it was a defeat exposing Russian weakness.

    • Assuming conscription was abolished.

      Put it right by explaining the term was shortened and liability widened, not ended.

    • Claiming all reforms were fully implemented.

      Put it right by noting practical limits and resistance.

    Exam tips

    • Link each reform to the wartime failure it addressed.
    • Use specific terms and dates, such as the 1856 Treaty of Paris.
    • Balance military reform against other pressures for change.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the Paper 3, Option 38.1: The making of modern Russia, 1855–1991 - 1 The political reforms of Alexander II, 1855–70: The impact of the Crimean War; impetus to reform; army reforms, including to training, weapons, promotions, the period of conscription and to military bureaucracy. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    Which military reform was introduced in Russia after the Crimean War as part of the drive to modernise the army?

    Listen

    Defeat in the Crimean War (1853–56) exposed Russia's backwardness: the Allies' rifled muskets and steam transport outmatched smoothbore weapons and ox-drawn supply, and the Treaty of Paris (1856) ended Black Sea naval presence. This humiliation gave Alexander II the impetus to reform, since serfdom and military rigidity were blamed. War Minister Milyutin's army reforms (1860s–70s) shortened conscription from 25 years to 6 years active plus 9 reserve, made service universal in principle, improved training and officer promotion by merit, introduced rifled weapons, and reorganised military bureaucracy into districts. Assess impact, impetus and each reform strand. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Explains how Crimean defeat exposed logistical, technological and administrative weakness, giving impetus to reform. Analyses Milyutin's reforms: reduced conscription term, universal liability, reserve system and their social effects. Evaluates changes to training, rifled weapons and promotion by merit, and their limits in practice. Assesses reform of military bureaucracy, including district organisation and its effect on efficiency. A common slip: Treating the Crimean War as a victory. Instead, stating it was a defeat exposing Russian weakness. Exam tip: Link each reform to the wartime failure it addressed.

    See it

    A top-down flowchart. The first box, Crimean War defeat, leads to a box reading Exposed Russian backwardness, which leads to Impetus to reform, which leads to Milyutin's army reforms. From Milyutin's army reforms, five boxes branch out: Training improved; Rifled weapons introduced; Promotion by merit; Conscription shortened and liability widened; Military bureaucracy reorganised into districts.
    Shows how Crimean War defeat gave the impetus to reform and led to the strands of Milyutin's army reforms.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Military modernisation

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Impact of defeat

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Conscription and society

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Military modernisation
    Reform of training, weapons, promotions, conscription and military bureaucracy, introduced by War Minister Milyutin in the 1860s–70s.
    Impact of defeat
    Crimean defeat exposed logistical, technological and administrative weakness, giving impetus to reform.
    Conscription and society
    Conscription was shortened from 25 years to 6 years active plus 9 reserve, and service was made universal in principle.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A top-down flowchart. The first box, Crimean War defeat, leads to a box reading Exposed Russian backwardness, which leads to Impetus to reform, which leads to Milyutin's army reforms. From Milyutin's army reforms, five boxes branch out: Training improved; Rifled weapons introduced; Promotion by merit; Conscription shortened and liability widened; Military bureaucracy reorganised into districts.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of Paper 3, Option 38.1: The making of modern Russia, 1855–1991 - 1 The political reforms of Alexander II, 1855–70: The impact of the Crimean War; impetus to reform; army reforms, including to training, weapons, promotions, the period of conscription and to military bureaucracy.

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge