AQA · A-Level · Physics

    Course version: 7408 · Version from Sept 2016

    Appreciation of balance between risk and benefits in the development of…

    Full specification wording

    Safety aspects (A-level only): Appreciation of balance between risk and benefits in the development of nuclear power.

    Nuclear power supplies large-scale low-carbon electricity, but its development involves hazards such as radiation exposure, radioactive waste and accident risk.

    Checked against the AQA 7408 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 3 of 3

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    Nuclear power supplies large-scale low-carbon electricity, but its development involves hazards such as radiation exposure, radioactive waste and accident risk. A balanced judgement weighs these risks against benefits including reliable baseload output, reduced greenhouse-gas emissions and fuel security. For example, compare the routine radiation dose from a nuclear plant with the health effects of air pollution from coal, and consider how waste is contained and monitored. The skill is to reason with evidence, not to declare nuclear power simply good or bad. You should identify the groups affected, the timescales involved and the uncertainties in each estimate, then reach a supported conclusion.

    What earns the marks

    • Identifies specific benefits of nuclear power, such as high energy density, low carbon dioxide emissions during operation and reliable baseload supply.
    • Identifies specific risks, such as ionising radiation exposure, long-lived radioactive waste and the consequences of accidents.
    • Compares risks and benefits using evidence, for example radiation dose data or greenhouse-gas emissions per unit of electricity generated.
    • Considers factors such as timescale, affected populations, waste storage and decommissioning costs.
    • Reaches a justified overall judgement that acknowledges uncertainty and the values behind the decision.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Listing benefits and risks without comparing them.

      Put it right: Explicitly weighing each risk against a named benefit.

    • Treating all radiation as equally dangerous regardless of dose.

      Put it right by referring to dose, exposure pathway and duration.

    • Claiming nuclear power is completely safe or completely unsafe.

      Put it right by using qualified language such as 'relatively low risk when regulated'.

    Exam tips

    • Use comparative connectives such as 'whereas' and 'however' to show balance.
    • Quote or estimate at least one quantitative comparison, such as carbon dioxide emissions per kilowatt-hour.
    • State clearly which risks are routine and which are accident-related, then judge their relative significance.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the Safety aspects (A-level only): Appreciation of balance between risk and benefits in the development of nuclear power. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    Which statement best describes why the development of nuclear power involves balancing risk against benefit?

    Listen

    Nuclear power supplies large-scale low-carbon electricity, but its development involves hazards such as radiation exposure, radioactive waste and accident risk. A balanced judgement weighs these risks against benefits including reliable baseload output, reduced greenhouse-gas emissions and fuel security. For example, compare the routine radiation dose from a nuclear plant with the health effects of air pollution from coal, and consider how waste is contained and monitored. The skill is to reason with evidence, not to declare nuclear power simply good or bad. You should identify the groups affected, the timescales involved and the uncertainties in each estimate, then reach a supported conclusion. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Identifies specific benefits of nuclear power, such as high energy density, low carbon dioxide emissions during operation and reliable baseload supply. Identifies specific risks, such as ionising radiation exposure, long-lived radioactive waste and the consequences of accidents. Compares risks and benefits using evidence, for example radiation dose data or greenhouse-gas emissions per unit of electricity generated. Considers factors such as timescale, affected populations, waste storage and decommissioning costs. A common slip: Listing benefits and risks without comparing them. Instead, explicitly weighing each risk against a named benefit. Exam tip: Use comparative connectives such as 'whereas' and 'however' to show balance.

    See it

    A top-down flowchart. The top node, 'Nuclear power development', branches into two nodes: 'Benefits' and 'Risks'. 'Benefits' branches into three nodes: 'High energy density', 'Low carbon dioxide emissions during operation' and 'Reliable baseload supply'. 'Risks' branches into three nodes: 'Ionising radiation exposure', 'Long-lived radioactive waste' and 'Consequences of accidents'. All six of these nodes lead into a single node, 'Weigh risks against benefits using evidence', which leads to a final node, 'Justified overall judgement acknowledging uncertainty'.
    It shows the named benefits and risks of nuclear power feeding into an evidence-based weighing that leads to a justified overall judgement.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A top-down flowchart. The top node, 'Nuclear power development', branches into two nodes: 'Benefits' and 'Risks'. 'Benefits' branches into three nodes: 'High energy density', 'Low carbon dioxide emissions during operation' and 'Reliable baseload supply'. 'Risks' branches into three nodes: 'Ionising radiation exposure', 'Long-lived radioactive waste' and 'Consequences of accidents'. All six of these nodes lead into a single node, 'Weigh risks against benefits using evidence', which leads to a final node, 'Justified overall judgement acknowledging uncertainty'.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of Safety aspects (A-level only): Appreciation of balance between risk and benefits in the development of nuclear power.

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge