This subtopic explores the systematic unearthing of archaeological sites through stratigraphic excavation, where layers of soil and features are removed in
Topic Synopsis
This subtopic explores the systematic unearthing of archaeological sites through stratigraphic excavation, where layers of soil and features are removed in reverse-chronological order to interpret site formation. Students learn to produce precise records using context sheets, scaled plans, and stratigraphic sections, ensuring that all spatial and artifact data is captured for analysis and future reference.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Stratigraphy: The principle that layers of soil (strata) are deposited sequentially, with older layers below younger ones. This is fundamental for relative dating—if an artefact is found in a lower layer, it's likely older than one above it.
- Radiocarbon dating: A radiometric method using the decay of carbon-14 to date organic materials up to ~50,000 years old. Remember that it gives a date range (e.g., 2500 ± 50 BP) and requires calibration due to atmospheric carbon-14 fluctuations.
- Geophysical survey: Non-invasive techniques like magnetometry (detecting magnetic anomalies from buried features) and resistivity (measuring soil moisture differences) to map underground structures before excavation.
- Context and association: The position of an artefact (its context) and its relationship with other finds (association) are critical. For example, a coin found in a grave can date the burial if the coin's minting date is known.
- Post-depositional processes: Factors like bioturbation (animal burrowing), ploughing, or chemical weathering that can disturb or alter archaeological deposits, complicating interpretation.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- When describing stratigraphic excavation, always relate your methods to the principle of stratigraphy, emphasising the removal of the most recent layers first and the importance of recognising interfaces.
- In assessed tasks, meticulously complete context sheets as if for a real archive; include even seemingly minor details like soil texture (e.g., sandy clay loam) and any disturbances, as marks are often allocated for thoroughness.
- Practice drawing sections from given multi-context data, ensuring that the lines are sharp, contexts are labelled, and a clear key is provided, as this tests both recording skill and stratigraphic interpretation.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Confusing the terms 'stratum' and 'context', or failing to recognise that a single context can represent a deposit, cut, or fill, leading to incorrect recording.
- Neglecting to record the relationships between contexts, such as 'above', 'below', or 'cuts', which undermines the stratigraphic sequence and the Harris matrix.
- Producing plan drawings that are not to scale, lack a north arrow or scale bar, or omit important context numbers, making them unusable for site interpretation.
Examiner Marking Points
- Award credit for demonstrating a clear understanding of the law of superposition and how it guides the sequence of excavation, including identifying and isolating distinct contexts.
- Credit accurate completion of context sheets, with detailed descriptions of soil composition, colour (using Munsell notation where appropriate), inclusions, and relationships to adjacent contexts.
- Credit the production of dimensionally accurate, scaled plan drawings that show the layout of features, including a north arrow, scale bar, and legend, with clear context numbers.
- Credit the drawing of stratigraphic sections that correctly represent the vertical relationships between layers, using standardized conventions for boundaries and interpreting the Harris matrix.