The Core Content of the OCR AS Psychology course introduces foundational research methods, ethical considerations, and key psychological studies. It equips
Topic Synopsis
The Core Content of the OCR AS Psychology course introduces foundational research methods, ethical considerations, and key psychological studies. It equips students with skills to critically evaluate methodologies and classic studies, forming a basis for understanding human behaviour. Mastery of these elements is essential for success in both examination papers and future psychological investigations.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Core studies: In-depth knowledge of 20 key studies (e.g., Milgram, Loftus & Palmer, Bowlby) including aims, procedures, findings, and conclusions.
- Research methods: Understanding of experimental, correlational, observational, and self-report techniques, plus issues of validity, reliability, sampling, and ethics.
- Ethical guidelines: BPS Code of Ethics and Conduct, including informed consent, deception, debriefing, and protection from harm.
- Approaches: Biological, cognitive, social, developmental, and individual differences perspectives and how they explain behaviour.
- Debates: Nature vs. nurture, free will vs. determinism, reductionism vs. holism, and idiographic vs. nomothetic approaches.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Always use the context provided in exam questions to justify your evaluation; generic answers rarely score full marks.
- For 10-mark evaluation questions, structure your answer by considering all relevant issues: methodology, ethics, validity, reliability, sampling, and cultural bias.
- Practice writing concise definitions for key terms, as Paper 1 often rewards precise explanations.
- When describing a study, highlight the procedure in a logical sequence and link it to the findings to demonstrate understanding.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Confusing correlation with causation when interpreting findings from non-experimental methods.
- Describing the aim of a study instead of evaluating it, missing the requirement for critical analysis.
- Omitting ethical considerations such as deception or informed consent when evaluating classic studies.
- Misinterpreting bar charts or histograms, leading to incorrect conclusions about data distribution.
Examiner Marking Points
- Award credit for correctly identifying the independent and dependent variables in an experimental scenario.
- Look for clear links between methodological criticisms and specific aspects of the study design.
- Accept responses that use psychological terminology accurately, such as 'operationalisation' or 'demand characteristics'.
- For ethical evaluation, credit must be given for referencing specific guidelines from the BPS Code of Ethics and Conduct.