How to Revise RAeS Level 3 Apprenticeship Assessment Aerospace Engineering Technician — Royal Aeronautical Society Apprenticeship Assessment Qualification Design and Technology
Core learning outcomes for RAeS Level 3 Apprenticeship Assessment Aerospace Engineering Technician
Examiner Tips for RAeS Level 3 Apprenticeship Assessment Aerospace Engineering Technician
- In written assessments, structure answers using the ‘What, Why, How’ approach: state the principle, explain its importance in aerospace, and give a practical example.
- During practical observations, talk through your actions as you work – assessors can only credit what they see and hear; verbalise checks like ‘I am zeroing the micrometer on the setting standard’.
- Revise ATA chapter numbers and their associated systems (e.g., ATA 27 – Flight Controls) as these are commonly referenced in technical questions and demonstrate systems knowledge.
- When completing logbook or portfolio entries, always link your evidence to specific learning outcomes and add a reflective note on what you learned or would improve, showing developmental competence.
Common Mistakes in RAeS Level 3 Apprenticeship Assessment Aerospace Engineering Technician
- Confusing the roles of a ‘permit to work’ and a ‘safe system of work’, leading to incomplete hazard identification before starting a task.
- Misreading tolerances on drawings: interpreting a bilateral tolerance as unilateral, or failing to recognise when a dimension is basic with a general tolerance block.
- Assuming all aluminium alloys have similar strength or corrosion resistance, without considering heat treatment condition (e.g., 2024-T3 vs. 7075-T6).
- Applying excessive pressure when using a micrometer, causing false readings due to frame deflection or thermal expansion from body heat.
- Neglecting to deburr drilled holes before tapping, resulting in misaligned threads or tap breakage.
- Omitting to verify calibrated equipment status before measurement, using tools that are out of calibration and therefore invalid for quality sign-off.
Key Marking Points
- Award credit for clearly explaining the hierarchy of control measures under the Health and Safety at Work Act and their application in an aerospace workshop.
- Award credit for accurately interpreting first and third angle orthographic projections, including section views, dimensions, and tolerances from an engineering drawing.