How do I choose the right theatre practitioner for my devising piece?

Start by considering the themes or story you want to explore. If your piece is political or aims to provoke thought, Brecht's epic theatre might be suitable. If you want to focus on psychological realism, Stanislavski or naturalism could work. For physical, movement-based theatre, consider practitioners like Frantic Assembly or DV8. Research their key techniques and ask yourself: 'Can I realistically apply these methods in my devising process?' Choose one that genuinely excites you and offers clear, applicable techniques.

What should I include in my devising log?

Your devising log should document the entire creative journey. Include initial responses to the stimulus, experiments with practitioner techniques, decisions made (and why), challenges faced, and how you overcame them. Also record feedback from rehearsals and your reflections on what worked or didn't. The log is not a diary—it should show analysis and evaluation. For example, instead of 'We tried a freeze frame,' write 'We used a freeze frame to highlight the power imbalance, inspired by Brecht's use of gestus, but it felt static, so we added slow motion to build tension.'

How long should our final performance be?

For WJEC A-Level Theatre Workshop, the performance typically lasts between 10 and 20 minutes, depending on group size. Check your specification for exact requirements, as this can vary. The key is to ensure you have enough time to demonstrate your practitioner's methodology and tell a complete story. It's better to be concise and polished than to rush through an overlong piece.

Can we use props, set, and lighting in our devising piece?

Yes, but they should serve a clear purpose and be integrated into your practitioner's style. For example, if you're using Brecht, you might use minimal set and visible lighting to remind the audience they're watching theatre. If you're using Artaud, you might use sensory elements like sound and light to overwhelm the audience. Avoid adding elements just because they look good—every choice must be justified in your evaluation.

How do I get top marks in the written evaluation?

Top marks come from critical reflection. Don't just describe what you did—evaluate its effectiveness. Use specific examples from your performance and link them to your practitioner's theory. Discuss what you would change if you did it again and why. Show that you understand the strengths and weaknesses of your piece. Also, use correct terminology (e.g., 'alienation effect,' 'magic if') and reference your devising log to show the process.

What if my group disagrees on creative decisions?

Disagreements are normal and can be productive if managed well. Use your practitioner's methodology as a framework to guide decisions—refer back to their principles to resolve conflicts. For example, if you're using Stanislavski, ask: 'What would the character's objective be here?' If that doesn't work, try a vote or compromise. Document the disagreement and how you resolved it in your log, as this shows collaborative skills. If a decision is truly blocking progress, seek your teacher's advice.

How to Revise Theatre Workshop — WJEC A-Level Drama

Theatre Workshop is a topic in the WJEC A-Level Drama specification. This guide covers learning objectives, examiner tips, common mistakes, and key terminology to help you revise effectively.

Examiner Tips for Theatre Workshop

Ensure the chosen practitioner's or company's influence is clearly recognisable in the final piece
Use the 'deconstruction' of the extract as a tool to challenge established interpretations
Focus on how the reinterpretation communicates specific artistic intentions to the audience
Ensure all group members, including designers, contribute fully to the creation and development process
Maintain a clear link between the research on the text in context and the practical choices made during development
Ensure the chosen text and practitioner/company combination allows all group members to target AO1 and AO2 effectively.
Use the research to 'deconstruct' the extract, challenging established interpretations to create original artistic intentions.
Document research thoroughly in the creative log, as it is assessed alongside the performance/design.

Common Mistakes in Theatre Workshop

Failing to include enough original text from the 10-15 minute extract (must be 30%-70%)
Neglecting to apply the chosen practitioner's or company's specific working methods and techniques
Treating the development stage as a purely descriptive process rather than a creative reinterpretation
Lack of clear connection between the research (Stage 1) and the practical development (Stage 2)
Insufficient rehearsal and refinement leading to a piece that lacks coherence
Failing to study the extract within the context of the whole text.

Key Marking Points

Evidence of creative ideas developed to produce a refined and coherent piece of theatre
Application of the chosen practitioner's or company's techniques, methods, style, and conventions
Effective use of dramatic conventions, forms, and techniques to communicate meaning
Substantial and recognisable content from the original 10-15 minute extract (30%-70% of the final piece)
Effective use of performance space and proxemics
Evidence of rehearsal and refinement of the piece

← Back to WJEC A-Level Drama

Theatre Workshop

WJEC

A-Level

In the 'Developing' stage of AS Unit 1: Theatre Workshop, learners participate in the creation and development of a piece of theatre based on a reinterpretation of a 10-15 minute extract from a chosen text. This involves reimagining the text for a different context or audience, using the working methods and techniques of a chosen influential theatre practitioner or company. Learners must 'deconstruct' the extract, with 30% to 70% of the final piece consisting of the original text, while the remainder grows out of the studied extract. The process includes rehearsing and refining the piece for performance.

Objectives

Exam Tips

Pitfalls

Key Terms

Mark Points

Topic Overview

Theatre Workshop is a dynamic and practical component of the WJEC A-Level Drama qualification, focusing on the collaborative creation of original theatre. Unlike scripted performance, this unit requires you to devise a piece of theatre from scratch, drawing on the work of a specific theatre practitioner or company. You will explore how to apply their methodologies—such as Brecht's epic theatre, Stanislavski's naturalism, or Frantic Assembly's physical theatre—to generate material, develop characters, and structure a performance. This process demands rigorous research, experimentation, and reflection, culminating in a final performance and a written evaluation.

This topic is vital because it develops your skills as an independent theatre-maker, not just an actor. You learn to generate ideas, collaborate effectively, and make artistic choices that communicate meaning to an audience. It also deepens your understanding of how theory translates into practice, as you must justify every decision in relation to your chosen practitioner. The skills you gain—critical thinking, creativity, and teamwork—are directly applicable to higher education and careers in the arts, education, and beyond.

Within the wider WJEC A-Level Drama course, Theatre Workshop complements the study of set texts and live theatre evaluation. While those units focus on analysis and interpretation, this unit places you in the role of creator. It allows you to demonstrate your understanding of theatrical conventions in a hands-on way, and it often becomes the most memorable part of the course because of the ownership you have over the final piece. Success here requires a balance of bold experimentation and disciplined reflection.

Key Concepts

Core ideas you must understand for this topic

→Devising: The process of creating original theatre through improvisation, research, and collaboration, rather than starting from a pre-written script.
→Practitioner Methodology: The specific techniques and principles of a chosen theatre practitioner (e.g., Brecht's alienation effect, Stanislavski's 'magic if', Artaud's Theatre of Cruelty) that shape your devising process.
→Stimulus: The starting point for your piece—could be a text, image, song, or concept—that inspires initial ideas and must be explored in depth.
→Evaluation and Reflection: The ongoing process of analysing your own work, both during devising (formative) and after performance (summative), to justify choices and assess effectiveness.
→Collaboration: The ability to work effectively in a group, negotiate ideas, and synthesise contributions into a cohesive piece of theatre.

What You Need to Demonstrate

Key skills and knowledge for this topic

Evidence of creative ideas developed to produce a refined and coherent piece of theatre
Application of the chosen practitioner's or company's techniques, methods, style, and conventions
Effective use of dramatic conventions, forms, and techniques to communicate meaning
Substantial and recognisable content from the original 10-15 minute extract (30%-70% of the final piece)
Effective use of performance space and proxemics
Evidence of rehearsal and refinement of the piece
Evidence of research into the chosen text's construction, specifically structure and character construction.
Evidence of research into the chosen practitioner or company, covering their historical/social/cultural context, purpose, practices, artistic intentions, innovative approach, working methods, style, conventions, and collaborations.

Marking Points

Key points examiners look for in your answers

Evidence of creative ideas developed to produce a refined and coherent piece of theatre
Application of the chosen practitioner's or company's techniques, methods, style, and conventions
Effective use of dramatic conventions, forms, and techniques to communicate meaning
Substantial and recognisable content from the original 10-15 minute extract (30%-70% of the final piece)
Effective use of performance space and proxemics
Evidence of rehearsal and refinement of the piece
Evidence of research into the chosen text's construction, specifically structure and character construction.
Evidence of research into the chosen practitioner or company, covering their historical/social/cultural context, purpose, practices, artistic intentions, innovative approach, working methods, style, conventions, and collaborations.
Demonstration of how research into the text and practitioner/company is applied to the creative process.
Clear links between dramatic theory and practice.
Suitability of the chosen practitioner/company for the group's abilities and the task.
Explanation of how ideas were created, developed, and refined to communicate meaning.
Justification of the use of conventions, forms, and techniques within the piece.
Demonstration of connections between dramatic theory and practice.
Application of research from the text extract (in context) and the chosen practitioner/company.
Justification of decisions made during the creative process.
Application of theatrical skills to realise artistic intentions in live performance (AO2).
Effective use of performance or design skills to communicate meaning.
Engagement with other performers on stage (for actors).
Adherence to minimum performance time requirements based on group size.
Realisation of specific technical requirements for design candidates (lighting, sound, set, or costume).
Clear identification of candidates at the start of the performance.
Effectiveness of the final performance or design as realized in performance
Analysis and evaluation of the learner's own performing or design skills
Analysis and evaluation of the learner's contribution to the success of the whole piece

Examiner Tips

Expert advice for maximising your marks

💡Ensure the chosen practitioner's or company's influence is clearly recognisable in the final piece
💡Use the 'deconstruction' of the extract as a tool to challenge established interpretations
💡Focus on how the reinterpretation communicates specific artistic intentions to the audience
💡Ensure all group members, including designers, contribute fully to the creation and development process
💡Maintain a clear link between the research on the text in context and the practical choices made during development
💡Ensure the chosen text and practitioner/company combination allows all group members to target AO1 and AO2 effectively.
💡Use the research to 'deconstruct' the extract, challenging established interpretations to create original artistic intentions.
💡Document research thoroughly in the creative log, as it is assessed alongside the performance/design.
💡Consult WJEC if there is any doubt regarding the suitability of a chosen practitioner or company.
💡Ensure the research is not just theoretical; it must be applied to the practical development of the piece.
💡Ensure the log is between 1000-1200 words or 5-8 minutes if audio-visual.
💡Select information carefully; focus on the 'why' behind creative decisions rather than just the 'what'.
💡Use annotated research, diagrams, or brief digital media clips (max 1 minute each) to support the log.
💡Ensure the log is monitored by the teacher at least once for authentication purposes.
💡Focus on how the practitioner's techniques were 'deconstructed' or applied to the extract.
💡Ensure the final performance is recorded audio-visually from the audience perspective in a single, unedited take.
💡Design candidates must ensure their design is fully realised in the live performance; technical equipment may be operated by others.
💡Actors must ensure they are fully engaged with other performers for a minimum of 5 minutes to allow for meaningful interaction.
💡Check that all design elements (e.g., 8 lighting states, 8 sound cues) meet the minimum technical requirements specified in the specification.
💡Ensure the performance is uploaded via the WJEC e-portfolio system as required.
💡Ensure the evaluation is between 800 and 1200 words
💡Use the specific assessment grid for Unit 1 Evaluation to guide the structure of the report
💡Focus on the effectiveness of the final outcome rather than just the process
💡Tip 1: Document everything. Keep a detailed devising log that records your ideas, experiments, and reflections. Examiners want to see evidence of a thoughtful, iterative process—not just a final product. Use this log to track how your practitioner's methods influenced each decision.
💡Tip 2: Be specific about your practitioner. Avoid vague references like 'We used Brechtian techniques.' Instead, name the exact technique (e.g., 'We used gestus to show the character's social status') and explain why it was appropriate for your piece.
💡Tip 3: In the evaluation, focus on 'so what?' After describing a choice, always evaluate its impact on the audience. For example, 'We used a direct address to break the fourth wall, which made the audience question the character's reliability.' This shows higher-order thinking.

Common Mistakes

Pitfalls to avoid in your exam answers

Failing to include enough original text from the 10-15 minute extract (must be 30%-70%)
Neglecting to apply the chosen practitioner's or company's specific working methods and techniques
Treating the development stage as a purely descriptive process rather than a creative reinterpretation
Lack of clear connection between the research (Stage 1) and the practical development (Stage 2)
Insufficient rehearsal and refinement leading to a piece that lacks coherence
Failing to study the extract within the context of the whole text.
Treating the research as a descriptive commentary rather than an analytical framework for practical work.
Choosing a practitioner or company that does not provide enough scope for the group's chosen text or design/acting skills.
Neglecting to explore all required aspects of the practitioner/company (e.g., historical context, artistic intentions, conventions).
Lack of clear connection between the research and the final practical outcome.
Writing a descriptive commentary of the rehearsal period rather than an analytical log.
Treating the log as an evaluation of the final piece rather than an explanation of the creative process.
Failing to explicitly link research on the practitioner/company to the practical choices made.
Including irrelevant information that does not address the creation of meaning or theoretical connections.
Exceeding the word count or time limit for the creative log.
Work that is significantly short of the time limit, which may lack sufficient evidence of development or audience engagement.
Exceeding the maximum performance time, as the moderator will stop watching and only assess work viewed within the limit.
Failure to clearly identify candidates by name and number at the start of the recording.
Poor quality or edited recordings that do not reflect the live performance from an audience perspective.
Descriptive commentary of the rehearsal period rather than analysis and evaluation
Failure to link the evaluation to the final realized performance or design
Lack of focus on the learner's individual contribution to the piece
Misconception: 'Devising means anything goes, so I don't need to plan.' Correction: Effective devising requires a clear structure and intention. You must set objectives, experiment systematically, and document your process to ensure a coherent final piece.
Misconception: 'I only need to know about my practitioner at the start.' Correction: Your practitioner's methodology should inform every stage of devising, from initial ideas to performance. You must consistently apply their techniques and be able to explain how they shaped your choices.
Misconception: 'The evaluation is just a diary of what we did.' Correction: The written evaluation must be analytical, not descriptive. You need to evaluate the effectiveness of your choices, linking them to your practitioner's theory, and reflect on what you would change.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions students ask about this topic

Before You Start

Prior knowledge that will help with this topic

•A basic understanding of at least one major theatre practitioner (e.g., Stanislavski, Brecht, Artaud) and their key techniques.
•Experience with group work and improvisation in a drama context, as devising relies heavily on collaboration and spontaneous creation.
•Familiarity with the concept of 'stimulus' and how to use it as a springboard for ideas, which is often covered in GCSE Drama.

Likely Command Words

How questions on this topic are typically asked

Create

Develop

Reinterpret

Reimagine

Deconstruct

Rehearse

Refine

Research

Study

Consider

Explore

Apply

Explain

Justify

Analyse

Evaluate

Outline

Realise

Communicate

Demonstrate

Perform

Ready to test yourself?

Practice questions tailored to this topic

Theatre Workshop

Topic Overview

Key Concepts

What You Need to Demonstrate

Marking Points

Examiner Tips

Common Mistakes

Frequently Asked Questions

Before You Start

Likely Command Words

Ready to test yourself?

Related Topics in WJEC A-Level Drama

Text in Action

E2E stub topic

Text in Action

Text in Action