The portfolio of evidence is a core component of the 'Devising drama' (01/02) non-exam assessment. It serves to document the learner's journey through the
Topic Synopsis
The portfolio of evidence is a core component of the 'Devising drama' (01/02) non-exam assessment. It serves to document the learner's journey through the devising process, from initial research and exploration of a stimulus to the final evaluation of their performance. It provides evidence for AO1 (creating and developing ideas) and AO4 (analysis and evaluation).
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Stimulus: The starting point for your piece (e.g., a photograph, poem, object, or news article). You must explore it from multiple angles to generate ideas.
- Dramatic Intentions: What you want the audience to think, feel, or understand. Every choice (character, staging, sound) should serve this purpose.
- Structure and Form: How you organise the piece (linear, non-linear, episodic) and the genre/style (naturalism, physical theatre, Brechtian).
- Collaboration and Evaluation: Working as an ensemble to refine ideas, and reflecting on your process in the portfolio (e.g., how you developed characters or solved problems).
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Ensure the portfolio clearly charts the journey from initial stimulus to final performance.
- Use the recommended formats (A4 sides, recorded presentation, or continuous prose) in proportion to the assessed work.
- Ensure all work is the learner's own, unaided work.
- Use the marking grids provided in the specification to understand the requirements for each band.
- Focus on the quality of analysis and evaluation rather than just describing what was done.
- Ensure the portfolio is submitted in an organised and structured way.
- Ensure the performance is video-recorded from the audience's perspective.
- Designers must work collaboratively with the performance group throughout rehearsals.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Including appendices (which are not permitted).
- Exceeding the recommended word count or length, which may not demonstrate the skills required to reach upper bands.
- Lack of clear links between research and the chosen stimulus.
- Failure to justify changes made during the development process.
- Weak analysis of how meaning is communicated to the audience.
- Incomplete evaluation of the final performance.
Examiner Marking Points
- Highly developed and detailed research linked to the stimulus material.
- Clear documentation of the development of the performance during the devising process.
- Evidence of progression from initial thoughts to the realised form.
- Justification of changes made during the development of the devised performance.
- Analysis of how the learner's own work creates meaning and how this is communicated to the audience.
- Evaluation of the final performance with analysis of how to improve for future performances.
- Use of accurate subject-specific terminology.
- Research and development of ideas linked to the stimulus (AO1)