A comparative critical study of two independently chosen texts, allowing students to pursue their own areas of interest. This non-exam assessment (NEA) com
Topic Synopsis
A comparative critical study of two independently chosen texts, allowing students to pursue their own areas of interest. This non-exam assessment (NEA) component requires an extended essay of 2,500 words and a bibliography, focusing on comparative similarity and difference, and the application of a range of critical views.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Comparative analysis: The ability to identify and explore connections, contrasts, and tensions between two texts, rather than treating them separately. This involves structuring your essay around thematic or stylistic points of comparison.
- Critical interpretations: Engaging with published literary criticism (e.g., scholarly articles, introductions) to support or challenge your own argument. You must reference at least one critical source, but integrating multiple perspectives strengthens your analysis.
- Contextual factors: Understanding how historical, social, cultural, and literary contexts shape each text. For pre-1900 texts, this includes the author's biography, publication history, and contemporary reception; for post-1900 texts, consider modern critical movements and the text's dialogue with earlier works.
- Argument and thesis: Your essay must have a clear, original thesis that drives the entire response. Avoid mere description or summary; instead, present a debatable claim about how the texts together illuminate a particular theme or issue.
- Academic style and referencing: Use formal academic language, avoid first-person pronouns (unless discussing your critical stance), and cite all sources accurately using a consistent referencing system (e.g., MLA, Harvard).
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Ensure at least one text was written pre-1900.
- Choose two texts by different authors that offer rich opportunities for comparative analysis.
- Negotiate the task individually to ensure it allows for the full range of assessment objectives.
- Ensure the chosen texts allow for the application of a range of critical views.
- Use a high-quality translation if choosing a text in translation.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Using texts from the exam set text lists.
- Failing to pay equal attention to both texts in the comparative essay.
- Neglecting to include a bibliography or using incorrect referencing.
- Exceeding or falling significantly short of the 2,500-word count.
- Failing to include consideration of different interpretations over time for at least one text.
Examiner Marking Points
- AO1: Articulate informed, personal and creative responses using appropriate concepts and terminology with coherent, accurate written expression.
- AO2: Analyse ways in which meanings are shaped in literary texts, focusing on authorial methods and structures.
- AO3: Demonstrate understanding of the significance of relevant contexts in which texts are written and received.
- AO4: Explore connections across literary texts arising out of comparative study.
- AO5: Explore literary texts informed by different interpretations, including consideration of different interpretations over time for at least one text.