A comparative study of two Hollywood films, one from the Classical Hollywood period (1930-1960) and one from the New Hollywood period (1961-1990). The stud
Topic Synopsis
A comparative study of two Hollywood films, one from the Classical Hollywood period (1930-1960) and one from the New Hollywood period (1961-1990). The study focuses on the core study areas (cinematography, mise-en-scène, editing, sound, performance, narrative, and genre) with a foregrounding of social, cultural, political, and institutional contexts, alongside the specialist study area of the auteur.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Vertical integration: The control of production, distribution, and exhibition by a single studio, which characterised the classical Hollywood studio system (e.g., MGM, Paramount, Warner Bros.) until the Paramount Decree forced divestiture of theatre chains.
- The Paramount Decree (1948): A landmark antitrust ruling that ended block booking and forced studios to sell their cinemas, leading to the decline of the studio system and the rise of independent production and package deals.
- New Hollywood (late 1960s–1970s): A period of artistic experimentation and auteur-driven filmmaking, influenced by European art cinema and countercultural movements, exemplified by films like Bonnie and Clyde (1967) and The Godfather (1972).
- The blockbuster mentality: Post-1975, Hollywood shifted towards high-concept, event films with massive marketing campaigns and merchandising tie-ins, prioritising spectacle and franchise potential over character-driven narratives.
- Classical Hollywood narrative: A cause-and-effect driven, linear narrative with psychologically motivated characters, closure, and invisible style (continuity editing, seamless sound) that dominated from the 1930s to the 1950s.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Ensure you select one film from Group 1 (Classical) and one from Group 2 (New Hollywood).
- Use the core study areas as a framework to structure your comparative analysis.
- Explicitly address the 'auteur' specialist study area in your response.
- Balance your analysis between the two films; do not spend significantly more time on one than the other.
- Use specific examples of film form (cinematography, editing, etc.) to support your arguments about context and auteurism.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Failing to explicitly compare the two films, instead writing two separate essays.
- Neglecting the institutional and production contexts that define the Classical and New Hollywood periods.
- Treating the auteur approach as a biography of the director rather than an analysis of signature features and creative control within an industrial system.
- Over-reliance on narrative summary rather than analytical discussion of film form.
- Ignoring the 'collaborative process' aspect of Hollywood production when discussing the auteur.
Examiner Marking Points
- Demonstration of knowledge and understanding of core study areas (film form, meaning and response, contexts).
- Application of knowledge and understanding to compare the two chosen films.
- Analysis of how institutional and production contexts (Classical vs. New Hollywood) are reflected in the films.
- Application of the auteur critical approach to identify distinctive creative contributions within the industrial production process.
- Use of subject-specific terminology.
- Evaluation of the validity of the auteur critical approach.