The character of the chosen developing country or emerging country city is influenced by its fast rate of growth — Edexcel GCSE Geography A
Verified courseTeaching note checked against the official specification.
The character of the chosen developing country or emerging country city is influenced by its fast rate of growth explained
The character of the chosen developing country or emerging country city is influenced by its fast rate of growth covers 3 specification points, including A.
Read the full explanation
Reasons for past and present trends in… and B. Causes of national and international…. Open a point below for its explanation and revision guidance.
a. Reasons for past and present trends in population growth (rates of natural increase, national and international migration, economic investment and growth).
This criterion asks you to explain why the chosen city's population has grown at past and present rates. Four drivers must be covered: natural increase (births exceeding deaths), national migration (such as rural-to-urban movement), international migration (people arriving from other countries) and economic investment and growth (jobs that attract workers). Explain how each driver adds to population change and how its importance has shifted over time. For example, migration may have driven early growth, with natural increase becoming more important later as migrants settle and have children. In MCQ practice, choose options that name a cause rather than an effect.
b. Causes of national and international migration and the impact on different parts of the chosen city (age structure, ethnicity, housing, services).
This criterion asks you to explain the causes of national and international migration into the chosen city and its impact on different parts of it. National migration is often driven by rural push factors, such as limited work, and urban pull factors, such as jobs. International migration may be driven by job opportunities, family links or conflict abroad. Then assess impact on age structure (migrants often add young adults), ethnicity (new communities change neighbourhood cultures), housing (rapid arrivals can cause overcrowding) and services (schools and clinics may struggle to keep pace). Link each impact to a named part of the city rather than the city as a whole.
c. How the growth of the chosen city is accompanied by increasing inequality (areas of extreme wealth versus poverty) and reasons for differences in quality of life.
This criterion asks how growth in your chosen city brings rising inequality, with areas of extreme wealth beside poverty, and why quality of life differs between places. Rapid growth often creates gated estates and business districts beside informal settlements, so the gap between households widens. Describe this contrast using named districts from your case study. Then explain reasons for differences in quality of life, such as unequal access to clean water, sanitation, healthcare, schools, secure housing and stable jobs. Explain causes too, for example unplanned migration and wealthier households buying private services.
Your focus
- Identify natural increase, national migration, international migration and economic investment as drivers of population growth.
- Select the cause that best explains a given past or present population trend in the chosen city.
- Justify why an option is rejected because it describes an effect rather than a reason.
Show all 9 objectives
- Identify push and pull factors behind national and international migration into the chosen city.
- Select the impact that correctly matches a named part of the city and one of the four named categories.
- Justify why an option is rejected because it confuses a cause with an impact or describes the city as a whole.
- Identify two contrasting areas of wealth and poverty in the chosen city from case study information.
- Explain how rapid growth can widen inequality between households.
- Explain at least two reasons for differences in quality of life between areas of the city.
The character of the chosen developing country or emerging country city is influenced by its fast rate of growth exam tips
Marking Points
- Identifies natural increase as a driver of population growth and explains it using birth and death rates.
- Explains national migration with a clear push or pull reason, such as rural-to-urban movement.
- Explains international migration with a specific reason, such as job opportunities abroad.
- Links economic investment and growth to population change through jobs that attract workers.
- Distinguishes between past and present trends, showing that the relative importance of drivers has changed.
- Explains a rural push factor and an urban pull factor for national migration.
- Explains a specific reason for international migration, such as family links or conflict abroad.
- Identifies at least one impact on age structure, ethnicity, housing or services in a named part of the city.
- Links each impact to a specific area of the city rather than describing the city as a whole.
- Links rapid growth to a widening gap between high-income and low-income households in the chosen city.
- Describes a named contrast between areas of extreme wealth and areas of poverty, using districts from the case study.
- Explains at least two reasons for differences in quality of life, such as access to water, sanitation, healthcare, schools, housing tenure or employment.
- Explains causes of the pattern, such as unplanned migration, weak land regulation or private provision of services for wealthier households.
- Uses case study evidence throughout rather than generic statements about developing countries.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Read each option and decide whether it names a driver or an outcome before selecting it.
- 💡Check that the chosen reason matches whether the question asks about past trends, present trends or both.
- 💡Eliminate options that mention a factor with no plausible link to population growth in the city.
- 💡Match each option to one of the named impact categories (age structure, ethnicity, housing, services) before selecting.
- 💡Check whether the question asks for a cause or an impact, and eliminate options that answer the other.
- 💡Use the wording of each option to decide whether the impact is linked to a named part of the city.
- 💡Plan a two-part answer: the pattern of inequality first, then the reasons for differences in quality of life.
- 💡Keep one named place from your case study in every paragraph so your examples stay specific.
- 💡When a multiple-choice option describes national averages or rural areas, eliminate it, because the criterion focuses on the chosen city.
Common Mistakes
- Presents population growth as a cause of migration without explaining the driver; reverse the logic and identify the reason people move.
- Treats natural increase as the same as migration; separate births minus deaths from people arriving in the city.
- Describes trends without naming reasons; add a driver for each change in population.
- Describes impacts in general terms without naming a part of the city; name the area affected.
- Confuses push and pull factors; push drives people away from their origin, while pull attracts them to the destination.
- Treats international migration as the same as national migration; check whether the move crosses a national border.
- Describes wealth and poverty in the city without showing how growth produces or widens the gap; link each description to the growth process.
- Treats quality of life as only income, ignoring access to services, housing and environment; list several dimensions and explain each one.
- Gives generic reasons such as poverty is bad, without naming a mechanism; explain the specific process, for example unequal land values or unplanned settlement.