The impacts of, and responses to drought vary depending on a country’s level of development — Edexcel GCSE Geography A
Verified courseTeaching note checked against the official specification.
The impacts of, and responses to drought vary depending on a country’s level of development explained
The impacts of, and responses to drought vary depending on a country’s level of development covers 3 specification points, including a.
Read the full explanation
Reasons why droughts are hazardous. and B. How the impacts of drought on people and…. Open a point below for its explanation and revision guidance.
a. Reasons why droughts are hazardous.
This statement asks for reasons why droughts are hazardous. A drought is a prolonged shortage of water, and its hazard lies in what it causes. Lack of rainfall lowers soil moisture and river and reservoir levels, causing crop failure and livestock deaths that threaten food supply and can lead to famine. Water shortages restrict drinking water, sanitation and industry, damaging health. Drought also raises wildfire risk, causes dust storms and reduces hydroelectric output. Economic losses fall on farmers and rural communities, sometimes forcing migration. Explain each reason as a cause-to-consequence chain, not a bare list.
b. How the impacts of drought on people and ecosystems can vary for a named developed and a named emerging or developing country.
Compare drought impacts on people and ecosystems in one named developed and one named emerging or developing country. Human impacts include water shortage, crop failure, food insecurity, lost income and ill health. Ecosystem impacts include vegetation loss, soil erosion, falling river flows and habitat loss. Developed countries often have piped water, irrigation, insurance and healthcare, reducing human harm, though ecosystems may still suffer. Emerging or developing countries may rely on rain-fed farming with fewer financial buffers, so the same rainfall deficit can cause greater food and income loss. Use a specific example for each, such as California in the USA and a named sub-Saharan African country, and state a distinct impact for each category.
c. Different responses to drought from individuals, organisations and governments in a named developed and a named emerging or developing country.
Compare drought responses by individuals, organisations and governments in one named developed and one named emerging or developing country. Individuals may cut water use, change farming, buy insurance or migrate, though options depend on income. Organisations such as NGOs and businesses may supply food, water tankers or drought-resistant seed. Governments may impose water restrictions, fund irrigation or deliver emergency relief. A developed country such as California in the USA may rely on regulation, water pricing and the 25% urban water cut mandated in 2015. An emerging or developing country may rely on emergency food and water aid from governments, agencies and NGOs. Name the group, its specific action and the country's development context in each answer.
Your focus
- List at least three reasons why drought is hazardous.
- Explain how water shortage leads to a named consequence such as crop failure.
- Describe a secondary hazard linked to drought, such as wildfire or dust storm.
Show all 9 objectives
- Identify human and ecosystem impacts of drought in named countries.
- Explain how level of development affects the scale of drought impacts.
- Name a specific drought impact for each of a named developed country and a named emerging or developing country.
- Identify responses to drought from individuals, organisations and governments.
- Explain how income, infrastructure and governance shape responses in named countries.
- Name a specific response to drought from a named developed country and from a named emerging or developing country.
The impacts of, and responses to drought vary depending on a country’s level of development exam tips
Marking Points
- Explains that drought lowers soil moisture and water supplies, causing crop failure and livestock deaths that threaten food security.
- Links water shortage to damage to health, sanitation and industry, with a clear consequence for people.
- Identifies secondary hazards such as wildfires, dust storms and reduced hydroelectric output, with a reason for each.
- Describes economic and social consequences, including loss of income for farmers and possible migration, using cause-and-effect language.
- Identifies at least two human impacts of drought in each named country, such as water shortage or food insecurity.
- Identifies at least two ecosystem impacts of drought in each named country, such as soil erosion or falling river flows.
- Links the scale of impact to the level of development, citing infrastructure, insurance or financial buffers.
- Uses a named, specific example for each country rather than generic statements about all developing countries.
- Explains why the same drought may affect people and ecosystems differently in the two named countries.
- Identifies a response from each of individuals, organisations and governments in both named countries.
- Describes what each group actually did, such as imposing water restrictions, supplying food aid or buying insurance.
- Explains how income, infrastructure and governance shape the type of response in each country.
- Uses named, specific examples for each country rather than generic claims about aid or regulation.
- Links each response to the country's level of development rather than listing actions in isolation.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Give at least three distinct reasons, each developed with a cause, a consequence and a specific example or detail.
- 💡Show why each impact threatens people, not merely that it happens, so the hazard is explained.
- 💡Check that your answer covers environmental, human and economic consequences rather than repeating one type of impact.
- 💡Plan a two-column table for human and ecosystem impacts before choosing answers, so neither category is overlooked.
- 💡Check that each option names a specific country and that the impacts match that country's development context.
- 💡Revise two named examples per development category and practise linking each to a specific impact.
- 💡Draw a grid with three rows for individuals, organisations and governments, then fill in one response per country for each row.
- 💡Check that every response is attached to a named group and a named country before moving on.
- 💡Revise one named developed and one named developing country case study, and practise stating the development link for each response.
Common Mistakes
- Lists drought effects such as hunger without explaining the chain from water shortage to the consequence; correct this by stating each link in the chain.
- Confuses a drought with a single short dry spell or with flooding; correct this by defining drought as a prolonged shortage of water relative to normal conditions.
- Treats drought hazards as only environmental and omits human and economic consequences; correct this by covering food, water, health and livelihoods.
- Treats drought impacts as crop losses only; include water supply, health, income and ecosystem effects.
- Describes emerging or developing countries as always suffering more, without a mechanism; explain the role of limited insurance, infrastructure or savings.
- Refers to a region or unnamed country; name a specific country for each development category.
- Ignores ecosystems and covers only people; address both categories for each country.
- Lists responses without saying which group made them; attach each response to individuals, organisations or governments.
- Treats individuals as having no response; describe actions such as farmers saving water or buying insurance.
- Describes aid in an emerging or developing country as coming from one source only; include governments, international agencies and NGOs.
- Gives a response with no link to the country's development level; explain why that response fits that country.