How to Revise CTQ Level 3 Award in Teaching and Assessing First Aid Qualifications — Certify Training Qualifications Vocationally-Related Qualification Health & Social Care
1 Understand principles and practices of learning and development in groups2 Be able to plan and prepare first aid training3 Be able to deliver first aid training4 Be able to evaluate the delivery of first aid training
Examiner Tips for CTQ Level 3 Award in Teaching and Assessing First Aid Qualifications
- Ensure all assessment decisions are supported by direct observation records and underpinning knowledge evidence.
- Use the plan-do-review cycle when evaluating own delivery to demonstrate reflective practice.
- Always reference specific regulatory bodies and awarding organisations by their full names to demonstrate precise knowledge.
- Use real-world scenarios to illustrate roles, such as describing actions during an unexpected incident in a training session.
- Structure written assignments around the ‘plan, do, review’ cycle to show how responsibilities are integrated into practice.
- When discussing relationships, highlight feedback loops between trainers, assessors, IQA, and EQA for higher marks.
- Always refer back to the assessment criteria when making decisions – annotate evidence to show your reasoning
- Use a variety of assessment methods to capture both practical competence and theoretical understanding
Common Mistakes in CTQ Level 3 Award in Teaching and Assessing First Aid Qualifications
- Confusing summative and formative assessment purposes, leading to inadequate skill checks.
- Over-reliance on lecture-style delivery without practical demonstration or learner participation.
- Failing to adapt session pace or content based on real-time learner feedback and engagement.
- Confusing the roles of regulatory bodies with those of awarding organisations, such as assuming HSE sets assessment criteria.
- Overlooking the trainer's responsibility for learner wellbeing, focusing only on first aid content delivery.
- Assuming that internal quality assurance is solely an administrative task rather than a developmental and supportive process.
Key Marking Points
- Award credit for demonstrating clear alignment of session plan with learning outcomes and assessment criteria.
- Look for evidence of inclusive teaching methods that accommodate different learning styles and abilities.