This element examines the dual legal frameworks—criminal and civil—available to address stalking, equipping Independent Stalking Advocates with the knowled
Topic Synopsis
This element examines the dual legal frameworks—criminal and civil—available to address stalking, equipping Independent Stalking Advocates with the knowledge to navigate legislation such as the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Stalking Protection Act 2019. It explores the criminal justice response, including police powers and prosecution, alongside civil protection orders like Stalking Protection Orders and Non-Molestation Orders, emphasising their practical application in safeguarding victims.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- The legal definition of stalking under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Stalking Protection Act 2019, including the difference between harassment and stalking.
- Risk assessment tools such as the Stalking Risk Profile (SRP) and the Domestic Abuse, Stalking and Harassment and Honour-Based Violence (DASH) risk checklist.
- The psychological impact of stalking, including trauma bonding, hypervigilance, and the cycle of abuse, and how to support victims using trauma-informed approaches.
- Multi-agency working: collaborating with police, mental health services, housing, and legal professionals to create a coordinated safety plan.
- Confidentiality and independence: maintaining victim trust while adhering to safeguarding duties and information-sharing protocols.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Always reference the specific legislation by name and year when discussing protections or processes, as this demonstrates precise knowledge.
- Structure your responses to clearly separate criminal and civil pathways, using case examples to illustrate how each operates and when they overlap.
- In scenario-based questions, explicitly address the victim’s safety planning and the role of the advocate in securing protection orders, not just identifying the legal options.
- Prepare comparisons between orders, such as duration, application process, and breach consequences, to showcase comprehensive understanding.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Confusing the definitions of harassment and stalking under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, often failing to recognise the 'fixated, obsessive, unwanted, and repeated' nature of stalking.
- Assuming that a criminal prosecution automatically provides civil protection, without acknowledging the need for separate civil applications.
- Overlooking the availability of Stalking Protection Orders as a civil remedy that can be sought independently of criminal proceedings.
- Misinterpreting the thresholds for different orders, such as underestimating the evidence required for a Non-Molestation Order compared to a Restraining Order.
Examiner Marking Points
- Award credit for accurately identifying and explaining key stalking legislation, including the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, the Stalking Protection Act 2019, and relevant amendments.
- Expect detailed knowledge of the criminal justice process, from reporting and risk assessment to charging decisions and sentencing guidelines for stalking offences.
- Require demonstration of the differences between criminal and civil remedies, with specific reference to orders such as Stalking Protection Orders, Restraining Orders, and Non-Molestation Orders.
- Look for evidence of understanding the victim’s perspective and how advocates can support access to both justice routes.