Paper 2, Option 2A.2: England and the Angevin Empire in the reign of Henry II, 1154–89 - 1 The restoration and extension of royal authority, 1154–72 — Edexcel A-Level History
Verified courseTeaching note checked against the official specification.
Paper 2, Option 2A.2: England and the Angevin Empire in the reign of Henry II, 1154–89 - 1 The restoration and extension of royal authority, 1154–72 explained
Paper 2, Option 2A.2: England and the Angevin Empire in the reign of Henry II, 1154–89 - 1 The restoration and extension of royal authority, 1154–72 covers 4 specification points, including Baronial power; declining royal revenues; the… and The destruction of illegal castles; the…. Open a point below for its explanation and revision guidance.
England and the Angevin Empire in 1154: baronial power; declining royal revenues; the extent of Angevin lands overseas; the power of Eleanor of Aquitaine.
In 1154 Henry II inherited a kingdom where baronial power was entrenched: magnates controlled castles, local courts and armed retinues, often acting with little royal oversight. Royal revenues had declined because royal lands were alienated, sheriffs and farmers paid fixed sums that lost value, and customary dues went uncollected. Overseas, the Angevin lands stretched from England through Normandy, Anjou, Maine and Touraine to Aquitaine, creating a cross-Channel empire with no single capital. Eleanor of Aquitaine, as duchess in her own right, brought the vast duchy and its resources; her political influence, patronage and independent authority made her a major power in the empire. Together these factors shaped the problems and opportunities Henry faced.
Henry II and the nobility: the destruction of illegal castles; the weakening of baronial power; the Cartae Baronum 1166; the Inquest of the Sheriffs 1170.
Henry II set out to reduce baronial power and restore royal authority. He ordered the destruction of illegal castles—those built without royal licence or held against the crown—to remove bases of rebellion. This weakened baronial power by limiting private fortifications and reminding lords of royal oversight. In 1166 the Cartae Baronum required tenants-in-chief to declare their knights' fees and subtenants, exposing the true extent of feudal resources and enabling the crown to tax and summon more accurately. In 1170 the Inquest of the Sheriffs investigated the conduct and revenues of sheriffs, checking corruption and ensuring that royal income and justice were properly administered. Together these measures increased royal control and financial reach.
Wales, Scotland and Ireland: making peace in Wales; the submission of Malcolm IV; the submission of the Irish kings and bishops.
[Final Result: Content Corrected] Henry II secured frontiers via military pressure and submissions. Making peace in Wales involved the 1157 campaign where Owain Gwynedd submitted, though the 1165 campaign failed. In Scotland, the submission of Malcolm IV occurred at Chester in 1157, surrendering northern counties. In Ireland, following the 1171–72 expedition, Henry received the submission of the Irish kings and bishops at Dublin and Cashel, reforming the church. These submissions extended Angevin authority without constant war, but relied on personal oaths and local cooperation, so control remained fragile.
The Angevin lands in France: Henry’s restoration of control in Normandy; acquisition and control of Brittany; relations and conflict with Louis VII of France; the significance of the peace of Montmirail.
Henry II worked to restore ducal authority in his French lands. His restoration of control in Normandy involved recovering castles and reasserting justice after Stephen's reign. The acquisition and control of Brittany began with establishing overlordship in 1158 when Conan IV did homage, culminating in 1166 when Conan was forced to abdicate, giving Henry direct control, though local lords resisted. Relations and conflict with Louis VII of France were tense, as Louis supported Henry's enemies, leading to campaigns like that of 1167. The significance of the peace of Montmirail (1169) lies in its attempt to settle disputes, confirming homage for Brittany and succession plans, but it failed to end the underlying Anglo-French rivalry.
Your focus
- Describe the main features of baronial power in England in 1154.
- Explain the causes of declining royal revenues by 1154.
- Identify the overseas lands of the Angevin Empire and explain the significance of Eleanor of Aquitaine's power.
Show all 12 objectives
- Describe Henry II's policies towards illegal castles and baronial power.
- Explain the purpose and significance of the Cartae Baronum 1166.
- Explain the purpose and significance of the Inquest of the Sheriffs 1170.
- Students can describe the main submissions in Wales, Scotland and Ireland between 1154 and 1172 with accurate dates.
- Students can explain how each submission extended Henry II's authority and what it required.
- Students can evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of relying on homage and oaths to control these regions.
- Students can describe Henry II's restoration of control in Normandy and acquisition of Brittany by 1166.
- Students can explain the nature of Henry's relations and conflict with Louis VII of France.
- Students can assess the significance of the peace of Montmirail in managing Angevin lands.
Paper 2, Option 2A.2: England and the Angevin Empire in the reign of Henry II, 1154–89 - 1 The restoration and extension of royal authority, 1154–72 exam tips
Marking Points
- Explains that baronial power rested on control of castles, private courts and armed followings, which limited royal authority in the localities.
- Analyses why royal revenues declined: alienated crown lands, fixed farm payments eroded by inflation, and gaps in collecting customary dues such as danegeld and feudal incidents.
- Describes the extent of Angevin lands overseas, naming Normandy, Anjou, Maine, Touraine and Aquitaine, and explains the challenge of ruling a cross-Channel empire.
- Assesses the power of Eleanor of Aquitaine as duchess in her own right, noting her wealth, patronage, political role and potential for independent action.
- Links the four factors, showing how baronial power, weak revenues, scattered lands and Eleanor's authority combined to shape Henry II's task in 1154.
- Explains how the destruction of illegal castles reduced baronial military capacity and asserted royal authority over fortification.
- Analyses how the weakening of baronial power was achieved through a combination of castle policy, legal and financial inquiries, and royal oversight.
- Describes the purpose and mechanics of the Cartae Baronum 1166: a survey of knights' fees and subtenants that revealed feudal resources for taxation and service.
- Explains the Inquest of the Sheriffs 1170 as an inquiry into sheriffs' conduct and revenues, aimed at improving royal finance and justice.
- Links the measures together, showing how they formed a coherent programme to restore and extend royal authority by 1172.
- Explains making peace in Wales, noting Owain Gwynedd's 1157 submission and the limits of royal power shown by the failed 1165 campaign.
- Identifies the submission of Malcolm IV at Chester in 1157, where he surrendered claims to Northumbria, Cumberland and Westmorland.
- Describes the submission of the Irish kings and bishops in 1171–72 at Dublin and Cashel, linking this to church reforms.
- Assesses the significance of these submissions in extending royal authority cheaply while depending on fragile personal loyalty.
- Explains Henry's restoration of control in Normandy after 1154 by recovering castles and reasserting ducal justice.
- Describes the acquisition and control of Brittany, noting overlordship in 1158, Conan IV's abdication in 1166, and resistance from Breton lords.
- Analyses relations and conflict with Louis VII of France, including military campaigns such as 1167 and Louis's support for Henry's rivals.
- Evaluates the significance of the peace of Montmirail (1169) as a settlement that confirmed homage but failed to remove underlying tensions.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Use a map or mental map to place the Angevin lands, so you can discuss the practical problems of distance and divided loyalty.
- 💡When analysing revenues, distinguish between income from crown lands, feudal incidents and customary taxes, and explain how each could decline.
- 💡Support claims about Eleanor with specific reference to Aquitaine's size and wealth, and to her role in patronage and politics.
- 💡Use precise dates and names for the Cartae Baronum and the Inquest of the Sheriffs to show secure knowledge.
- 💡Explain the mechanism of each measure—how it worked—rather than just naming it.
- 💡Connect each measure to the broader aim of restoring royal authority, and use them as evidence in essays on Henry II's governance.
- 💡Anchor each submission to a named place and date (Chester 1157, Dublin 1171) to show precise knowledge.
- 💡Link each submission to the theme of restoring royal authority: explain what Henry gained and what limits remained.
- 💡Focus strictly on the 1154–1172 timeframe, avoiding later events like the 1173–74 revolt or 1181 marriage.
- 💡For Montmirail, state the date (1169) and explain both what it settled and what it left unresolved.
Common Mistakes
- Treating baronial power as simply 'lawlessness' rather than a structured system of local lordship; correction: explain how castles, courts and retinues gave barons legitimate local authority that the king had to negotiate with.
- Assuming royal revenues were low only because of waste; correction: identify structural causes such as alienated lands, fixed farms and uncollected dues.
- Describing Eleanor of Aquitaine only as Henry's wife; correction: explain her independent status as duchess and her own political and territorial power.
- Confusing the Cartae Baronum with Domesday Book; correction: explain that the Cartae Baronum was a specific 1166 inquiry into knights' fees and subtenants, not a general land survey.
- Assuming the Inquest of the Sheriffs was only about punishing corruption; correction: explain its wider aim of checking royal revenues and the administration of justice.
- Treating castle destruction as a single event; correction: describe it as an ongoing policy of demolishing or licensing castles to reduce baronial power.
- Treating the Welsh peace as a single event; correct by distinguishing the 1157 submission from the failed 1165 campaign.
- Confusing Malcolm IV's 1157 submission with the 1174 Treaty of Falaise; correct by stating Malcolm submitted voluntarily at Chester.
- Claiming Henry conquered all Ireland; correct by explaining he received submissions from kings and bishops but lacked full administration.
- Assuming Henry recovered Normandy from his brother Geoffrey; correct by noting Geoffrey's 1156 rebellion concerned Anjou, not Normandy.
- Dating the establishment of overlordship of Brittany to 1166; correct by explaining overlordship was established in 1158, while 1166 marked Conan IV's forced abdication and direct control.
- Treating the peace of Montmirail as a final settlement; correct by showing it was a temporary agreement that did not stop later conflict.