Option 12: c1700–c1900: Warfare and British society in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries - 3 Case studies ● The Battle of Waterloo (1815): reasons for its outcome; the role of the Duke of Wellington. — Edexcel GCSE History
Test yourself on Option 12: c1700–c1900: Warfare and British society in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries - 3 Case studies ● The Battle of Waterloo (1815): reasons for its outcome; the role of the Duke of Wellington. with PEARSON EDEXCEL GCSE practice questions.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge
Option 12: c1700–c1900: Warfare and British society in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries - 3 Case studies ● The Battle of Waterloo (1815): reasons for its outcome; the role of the Duke of Wellington. explained
The Battle of Balaclava (1854) was a key Crimean War engagement defined by heroic stands and disastrous miscommunications.
Read the full explanation
The outcome was a tactical draw, as Russian forces failed to capture the British base. This outcome was heavily influenced by the role of Lord Raglan, the British commander. Raglan's vague written orders and his high vantage point, which did not match the limited view of his subordinates, led directly to the Charge of the Light Brigade. Poor communication between Raglan, Nolan, and Lucan caused the cavalry to charge the wrong artillery battery, suffering heavy casualties. The successful 'Thin Red Line' and the Charge of the Heavy Brigade prevented a Russian victory despite Raglan's significant command errors.
Your focus
- Identify the key events that determined the outcome of the Battle of Balaclava.
- Analyse the communication failures that led to the Charge of the Light Brigade.
- Evaluate the effectiveness of Lord Raglan's leadership during the battle.
Option 12: c1700–c1900: Warfare and British society in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries - 3 Case studies ● The Battle of Waterloo (1815): reasons for its outcome; the role of the Duke of Wellington. exam tips
Marking Points
- Explain how Lord Raglan's vague orders contributed to the disastrous Charge of the Light Brigade.
- Describe the impact of the terrain and Raglan's high vantage point on the misinterpretation of his orders by Lord Lucan.
- Analyse the role of the 'Thin Red Line' (93rd Highlanders) in halting the Russian cavalry advance.
- Evaluate the success of the Charge of the Heavy Brigade in disrupting the Russian attack.
- Assess the overall outcome of the battle as a tactical draw but a strategic failure for the Russians.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Clearly distinguish between the actions of the Light Brigade, the Heavy Brigade, and the 93rd Highlanders when explaining the battle's outcome.
- 💡Focus on the chain of command and communication failures when evaluating Lord Raglan's role.
- 💡Use the Battle of Balaclava to illustrate wider themes of aristocratic leadership and military incompetence in the nineteenth century.
Common Mistakes
- Stating that the Charge of the Light Brigade was a complete military defeat for the British; correction: while casualties were high, the Light Brigade did reach the guns and force a Russian retreat, and the overall battle prevented the Russians from taking Balaclava.
- Blaming only Lord Raglan for the Light Brigade disaster; correction: the disaster was a combination of Raglan's vague orders, Nolan's poor delivery, and Lucan's failure to clarify the objective.
- Confusing the roles of the Heavy and Light Brigades; correction: the Heavy Brigade successfully charged uphill to defeat a larger Russian cavalry force, whereas the Light Brigade charged down a valley into concentrated artillery fire.