Option B1: Key topic 2: William I in power: securing the kingdom, 1066–87 - 2 Anglo-Saxon resistance, 1068–71 — Edexcel GCSE History
Test yourself on Option B1: Key topic 2: William I in power: securing the kingdom, 1066–87 - 2 Anglo-Saxon resistance, 1068–71 with PEARSON EDEXCEL GCSE practice questions.
7 days Premium · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge
Option B1: Key topic 2: William I in power: securing the kingdom, 1066–87 - 2 Anglo-Saxon resistance, 1068–71 explained
Anglo-Saxon resistance stemmed from loss of land and Norman abuses.
Read the full explanation
In 1068, Earls Edwin and Morcar revolted due to broken promises and lost power, but surrendered quickly when William marched north building castles. In 1069, Edgar the Aethling, backed by Scottish and Danish forces, led severe rebellions in the North, destroying the Norman garrison at York. William responded ruthlessly, paying off the Danes and devastating the region. In 1070–71, Hereward the Wake waged a guerrilla war from the Isle of Ely, allied with the Danes. William besieged Ely, capturing Morcar and forcing Hereward to flee. The outcome of these revolts was the systematic destruction of the Anglo-Saxon aristocracy and total Norman domination.
Your focus
- Identify the specific causes of the revolts led by Edwin and Morcar, Edgar the Aethling, and Hereward the Wake.
- Describe the methods William I used to suppress each of these three major rebellions.
- Evaluate the outcomes of the resistance for the Anglo-Saxon nobility and Norman control.
Option B1: Key topic 2: William I in power: securing the kingdom, 1066–87 - 2 Anglo-Saxon resistance, 1068–71 exam tips
Quick Revision Summary (Key Takeaway)
Between 1068 and 1071, Anglo-Saxon resistance against William I peaked through major rebellions led by Edwin, Morcar, Edgar Aethling, and Hereward the Wake. William brutally suppressed these uprisings using military force, castle building, and the devastating Harrying of the North to consolidate Norman control.
Topic Overview
Following his coronation in December 1066, William I faced widespread defiance from Anglo-Saxon nobility and regional populations unwilling to accept Norman hegemony. Between 1068 and 1071, a series of rebellions erupted across the Midlands, the North, the Welsh border, and the East Anglian Fens, challenging William's tenuous grip on the kingdom.
Understanding these rebellions reveals how William transitioned from attempting to rule with an Anglo-Saxon aristocracy to systematically replacing them with Norman tenants-in-chief. His brutal responses—epitomised by the Harrying of the North and extensive castle construction—fundamentally transformed English society, land ownership, and governance.
Key Concepts
- →Revolt of Edwin and Morcar (1068): Triggered by William reneging on a marriage pact with Edwin, loss of land, and unjust Norman geld taxes; collapsed swiftly due to William's rapid castle building in Warwick and Nottingham.
- →Northern Rebellions and Edgar Aethling (1069): Led to the massacre of Robert Cumin at Durham and the capture of York with Danish fleet support; posed an existential dynastic threat by championing Edgar as the legitimate Anglo-Saxon heir.
- →The Harrying of the North (winter 1069-70): Total warfare scorched-earth policy carried out by William across Yorkshire and the East Riding, causing over 100,000 deaths through starvation and leaving the region desolate for decades.
- →Hereward the Wake and the Ely Rebellion (1070-71): An insurgency in the Cambridgeshire marshes combining local resistance, Earl Morcar, and Danish plunderers, ending the final major Anglo-Saxon resistance after William successfully crossed the Fens.
Marking Points
- Explain the causes of the 1068 revolt by Edwin and Morcar, including William's broken promises and their loss of influence.
- Describe the events of the 1069 northern rebellions involving Edgar the Aethling, highlighting the role of Danish and Scottish support.
- Detail the guerrilla tactics used by Hereward the Wake at Ely (1070–71) and William's successful siege to end the resistance.
- Analyse the overall outcomes of these rebellions, specifically the replacement of English lords with Normans and the strengthening of royal control.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Create a timeline of the three main rebellions to keep the dates, leaders, and specific outcomes distinct in your memory.
- 💡Emphasise William's use of castle building and rapid troop movements as his primary methods for defeating these uprisings.
- 💡Link the failure of these rebellions directly to the subsequent Harrying of the North and the decline of the Anglo-Saxon earldoms.
- 💡Explicitly connect William's defensive castle-building programme directly to his suppression of revolts; castles were erected at every major revolt location (e.g., Warwick, Nottingham, York).
- 💡Quote the long-term impact evidenced in the 1086 Domesday Book, noting that large sections of Yorkshire were recorded as 'waste' fifteen years after the Harrying.
- 💡In 12-mark 'Explain why' questions, ensure each paragraph has a distinct theme (e.g., resentment of castles, loss of Anglo-Saxon land/titles, foreign alliances) and end with an analytical link back to the question.
Common Mistakes
- Treating all rebellions as a single coordinated event; correction: the rebellions were distinct, occurring in different years (1068, 1069, 1070-71) with different leaders and specific local grievances.
- Overstating the success of the rebellions; correction: while they caused significant disruption, particularly in York, William successfully suppressed all of them.
- Forgetting the role of foreign intervention; correction: both the 1069 northern rebellions and the rebellion at Ely involved crucial support from Danish fleets.
- Believing King Sweyn of Denmark wanted to place Edgar Aethling on the English throne; in reality, Sweyn sought Danegeld, plunder, and the restoration of Cnut's North Sea Empire for himself.
- Assuming Hereward the Wake was a mythical figure; Hereward was a real historical landholder who operated as an Anglo-Saxon thegn fighting against the dispossession of his family estate.
- Thinking the Harrying of the North was merely a brief battle; it was a sustained, systematic campaign of agricultural and infrastructural destruction that lasted an entire winter.
Revision Plan
- 1Session 1: Map the timeline and geography of the three core revolts (1068 Midlands, 1069 North, 1070-71 Ely).
- 2Session 2: Analyse the causes, events, and consequences of the Northern rebellions, memorising key statistics on the Harrying of the North.
- 3Session 3: Evaluate Hereward the Wake's campaign at Ely and how William overcame the environmental challenges of the Fens.
- 4Session 4: Practice timed 4-mark and 12-mark exam questions, ensuring cause-and-consequence chains are thoroughly developed.
Exam Question Types
- 📋Describe two features of... (4 marks): Requires two separate points, each with a clear identifying sentence followed by specific historical supporting detail.
- 📋Explain why... (12 marks): Demands three fully explained thematic PEEL (Point, Evidence, Explain, Link) paragraphs examining causes or consequences with accurate chronological detail.
- 📋How far do you agree? / 'Statement' (16 marks): Requires a balanced argument evaluating a given view against alternative factors, concluding with a fully justified, weighed judgement.
Command Word Expectations (PEARSON EDEXCEL)
Identify two distinct characteristics of an event, rebellion, or policy. For each feature, award 1 mark for the basic feature and 1 mark for specific, accurate supporting detail.
Provide a structured explanation showing multiple causal factors or consequences. Success requires detailed contextual knowledge (Level 3/4) and clear analytical links to the prompt.
How Students Lose Marks (Examiner Pitfalls)
Step-by-Step Worked Solutions
Question: Explain why there was Anglo-Saxon resistance to Norman rule between 1068 and 1071. (12 marks)
- 1.Step 1: Identify three distinct causes of resistance: loss of land and status, heavy taxation and castle building, and external foreign intervention (Danish and Scottish support).
- 2.Step 2: Paragraph 1 - Explain loss of land and status. Focus on Edwin (William broke his promise of marriage to his daughter and reduced his earldom) and Morcar (his earldom of Northumbria was reduced).
- 3.Step 3: Paragraph 2 - Explain the physical and economic oppression of castles and taxation. The imposition of high geld taxes in 1067 and the rapid construction of motte-and-bailey castles provoked intense local hatred, destroying homes and symbolizing Norman dominance.
- 4.Step 4: Paragraph 3 - Explain political dynastic claims and foreign backing. Edgar Aethling claimed the throne as the last legitimate royal Atheling, securing military backing from Malcolm III of Scotland and King Sweyn of Denmark in 1069.
- 5.Step 5: Conclusion - Provide a substantiated judgement showing that while grievances over land and castles caused initial unrest, foreign support transformed local resistance into an existential threat to William's crown.
Question: Describe two features of the rebellion of Hereward the Wake at Ely in 1070-71. (4 marks)
- 1.Step 1: Identify Feature 1 and provide supporting historical detail. Focus on the guerrilla warfare tactics and the alliance with King Sweyn's Danish fleet.
- 2.Step 2: Identify Feature 2 and provide supporting historical detail. Focus on the betrayal by local monks or William's siege bridge across the Fens to storm the island.
- 3.Step 3: Check that each feature has one identified point and one developed, specific detail to achieve 2 marks per feature.