Skip to topic
    ← Back to course topics

    Option B1: Key topic 2: William I in power: securing the kingdom, 1066–87 - 2 Anglo-Saxon resistance, 1068–71 — Edexcel GCSE History

    Test yourself on Option B1: Key topic 2: William I in power: securing the kingdom, 1066–87 - 2 Anglo-Saxon resistance, 1068–71 with PEARSON EDEXCEL GCSE practice questions.

    Start free

    7 days Premium · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Option B1: Key topic 2: William I in power: securing the kingdom, 1066–87 - 2 Anglo-Saxon resistance, 1068–71 explained

    Anglo-Saxon resistance stemmed from loss of land and Norman abuses.

    Read the full explanation

    In 1068, Earls Edwin and Morcar revolted due to broken promises and lost power, but surrendered quickly when William marched north building castles. In 1069, Edgar the Aethling, backed by Scottish and Danish forces, led severe rebellions in the North, destroying the Norman garrison at York. William responded ruthlessly, paying off the Danes and devastating the region. In 1070–71, Hereward the Wake waged a guerrilla war from the Isle of Ely, allied with the Danes. William besieged Ely, capturing Morcar and forcing Hereward to flee. The outcome of these revolts was the systematic destruction of the Anglo-Saxon aristocracy and total Norman domination.

    Your focus

    1. Identify the specific causes of the revolts led by Edwin and Morcar, Edgar the Aethling, and Hereward the Wake.
    2. Describe the methods William I used to suppress each of these three major rebellions.
    3. Evaluate the outcomes of the resistance for the Anglo-Saxon nobility and Norman control.

    Option B1: Key topic 2: William I in power: securing the kingdom, 1066–87 - 2 Anglo-Saxon resistance, 1068–71 exam tips

    Quick Revision Summary (Key Takeaway)

    Between 1068 and 1071, Anglo-Saxon resistance against William I peaked through major rebellions led by Edwin, Morcar, Edgar Aethling, and Hereward the Wake. William brutally suppressed these uprisings using military force, castle building, and the devastating Harrying of the North to consolidate Norman control.

    Topic Overview

    Following his coronation in December 1066, William I faced widespread defiance from Anglo-Saxon nobility and regional populations unwilling to accept Norman hegemony. Between 1068 and 1071, a series of rebellions erupted across the Midlands, the North, the Welsh border, and the East Anglian Fens, challenging William's tenuous grip on the kingdom.

    Understanding these rebellions reveals how William transitioned from attempting to rule with an Anglo-Saxon aristocracy to systematically replacing them with Norman tenants-in-chief. His brutal responses—epitomised by the Harrying of the North and extensive castle construction—fundamentally transformed English society, land ownership, and governance.

    Key Concepts
    • →Revolt of Edwin and Morcar (1068): Triggered by William reneging on a marriage pact with Edwin, loss of land, and unjust Norman geld taxes; collapsed swiftly due to William's rapid castle building in Warwick and Nottingham.
    • →Northern Rebellions and Edgar Aethling (1069): Led to the massacre of Robert Cumin at Durham and the capture of York with Danish fleet support; posed an existential dynastic threat by championing Edgar as the legitimate Anglo-Saxon heir.
    • →The Harrying of the North (winter 1069-70): Total warfare scorched-earth policy carried out by William across Yorkshire and the East Riding, causing over 100,000 deaths through starvation and leaving the region desolate for decades.
    • →Hereward the Wake and the Ely Rebellion (1070-71): An insurgency in the Cambridgeshire marshes combining local resistance, Earl Morcar, and Danish plunderers, ending the final major Anglo-Saxon resistance after William successfully crossed the Fens.
    Marking Points
    • Explain the causes of the 1068 revolt by Edwin and Morcar, including William's broken promises and their loss of influence.
    • Describe the events of the 1069 northern rebellions involving Edgar the Aethling, highlighting the role of Danish and Scottish support.
    • Detail the guerrilla tactics used by Hereward the Wake at Ely (1070–71) and William's successful siege to end the resistance.
    • Analyse the overall outcomes of these rebellions, specifically the replacement of English lords with Normans and the strengthening of royal control.
    Examiner Tips
    • 💡Create a timeline of the three main rebellions to keep the dates, leaders, and specific outcomes distinct in your memory.
    • 💡Emphasise William's use of castle building and rapid troop movements as his primary methods for defeating these uprisings.
    • 💡Link the failure of these rebellions directly to the subsequent Harrying of the North and the decline of the Anglo-Saxon earldoms.
    • 💡Explicitly connect William's defensive castle-building programme directly to his suppression of revolts; castles were erected at every major revolt location (e.g., Warwick, Nottingham, York).
    • 💡Quote the long-term impact evidenced in the 1086 Domesday Book, noting that large sections of Yorkshire were recorded as 'waste' fifteen years after the Harrying.
    • 💡In 12-mark 'Explain why' questions, ensure each paragraph has a distinct theme (e.g., resentment of castles, loss of Anglo-Saxon land/titles, foreign alliances) and end with an analytical link back to the question.
    Common Mistakes
    • Treating all rebellions as a single coordinated event; correction: the rebellions were distinct, occurring in different years (1068, 1069, 1070-71) with different leaders and specific local grievances.
    • Overstating the success of the rebellions; correction: while they caused significant disruption, particularly in York, William successfully suppressed all of them.
    • Forgetting the role of foreign intervention; correction: both the 1069 northern rebellions and the rebellion at Ely involved crucial support from Danish fleets.
    • Believing King Sweyn of Denmark wanted to place Edgar Aethling on the English throne; in reality, Sweyn sought Danegeld, plunder, and the restoration of Cnut's North Sea Empire for himself.
    • Assuming Hereward the Wake was a mythical figure; Hereward was a real historical landholder who operated as an Anglo-Saxon thegn fighting against the dispossession of his family estate.
    • Thinking the Harrying of the North was merely a brief battle; it was a sustained, systematic campaign of agricultural and infrastructural destruction that lasted an entire winter.
    Revision Plan
    1. 1Session 1: Map the timeline and geography of the three core revolts (1068 Midlands, 1069 North, 1070-71 Ely).
    2. 2Session 2: Analyse the causes, events, and consequences of the Northern rebellions, memorising key statistics on the Harrying of the North.
    3. 3Session 3: Evaluate Hereward the Wake's campaign at Ely and how William overcame the environmental challenges of the Fens.
    4. 4Session 4: Practice timed 4-mark and 12-mark exam questions, ensuring cause-and-consequence chains are thoroughly developed.
    Exam Question Types
    • 📋Describe two features of... (4 marks): Requires two separate points, each with a clear identifying sentence followed by specific historical supporting detail.
    • 📋Explain why... (12 marks): Demands three fully explained thematic PEEL (Point, Evidence, Explain, Link) paragraphs examining causes or consequences with accurate chronological detail.
    • 📋How far do you agree? / 'Statement' (16 marks): Requires a balanced argument evaluating a given view against alternative factors, concluding with a fully justified, weighed judgement.
    Command Word Expectations (PEARSON EDEXCEL)
    Describe two features

    Identify two distinct characteristics of an event, rebellion, or policy. For each feature, award 1 mark for the basic feature and 1 mark for specific, accurate supporting detail.

    Explain why

    Provide a structured explanation showing multiple causal factors or consequences. Success requires detailed contextual knowledge (Level 3/4) and clear analytical links to the prompt.

    How Students Lose Marks (Examiner Pitfalls)
    Pitfall: Treating Anglo-Saxon resistance as a coordinated national movement rather than fragmented, regionally isolated rebellions with conflicting motives.
    ❌ Weak Answer (Loses Marks):The English rebelled all across the country together because they hated William. Edwin, Morcar, and Hereward worked as an army to drive the Normans out, but William was too strong for them.
    Example improved answer:Anglo-Saxon resistance was fragmented and undermined by differing regional aims. In 1068, Edwin and Morcar rebelled primarily over lost lands and status, surrendering swiftly when William built motte-and-bailey castles at Warwick and Nottingham. By contrast, the 1069 northern rebellion led by Edgar Aethling sought to replace William on the throne, aided by King Sweyn of Denmark, whereas Hereward the Wake's 1070-71 Ely rebellion was an isolated guerrilla campaign driven by local grievances. The lack of simultaneous coordination allowed William to defeat each threat in sequence.
    Examiner Tip: Always distinguish between the distinct rebellions: Edwin and Morcar (1068), the Northern rebellions and Edgar Aethling (1069), and Hereward the Wake at Ely (1070-71).
    Pitfall: Confusing the causes of the Harrying of the North with its long-term consequences, or failing to cite specific historical details like the death of Robert de Commines.
    ❌ Weak Answer (Loses Marks):William was angry that the people of York killed his men, so he burned down their houses and crops. This stopped any more rebellions from happening in England.
    Example improved answer:The Harrying of the North (winter 1069-70) was triggered by the slaughter of Robert Cumin (Commines) and his garrison in Durham, followed by the Anglo-Danish capture of York. William reacted ruthlessly to remove the threat of future Danish invasion and eradicate northern revolt. By burning crops, salting arable land, slaughtering livestock, and destroying seed stores, he triggered widespread famine that caused an estimated 100,000 deaths. The 1086 Domesday Book confirmed that vast tracts of Yorkshire remained classified as 'waste' (vastum) over 15 years later.
    Examiner Tip: Use specific data and contemporary evidence, such as referencing Robert Cumin, Orderic Vitalis's accounts of famine, and the Domesday Book entry of 'waste'.
    Step-by-Step Worked Solutions

    Question: Explain why there was Anglo-Saxon resistance to Norman rule between 1068 and 1071. (12 marks)

    1. 1.Step 1: Identify three distinct causes of resistance: loss of land and status, heavy taxation and castle building, and external foreign intervention (Danish and Scottish support).
    2. 2.Step 2: Paragraph 1 - Explain loss of land and status. Focus on Edwin (William broke his promise of marriage to his daughter and reduced his earldom) and Morcar (his earldom of Northumbria was reduced).
    3. 3.Step 3: Paragraph 2 - Explain the physical and economic oppression of castles and taxation. The imposition of high geld taxes in 1067 and the rapid construction of motte-and-bailey castles provoked intense local hatred, destroying homes and symbolizing Norman dominance.
    4. 4.Step 4: Paragraph 3 - Explain political dynastic claims and foreign backing. Edgar Aethling claimed the throne as the last legitimate royal Atheling, securing military backing from Malcolm III of Scotland and King Sweyn of Denmark in 1069.
    5. 5.Step 5: Conclusion - Provide a substantiated judgement showing that while grievances over land and castles caused initial unrest, foreign support transformed local resistance into an existential threat to William's crown.
    Final Answer: Resistance was driven by personal resentment over lost land and power, community outrage at brutal taxation and castle building, and dynastic claims spearheaded by Edgar Aethling with Danish and Scottish military support.

    Question: Describe two features of the rebellion of Hereward the Wake at Ely in 1070-71. (4 marks)

    1. 1.Step 1: Identify Feature 1 and provide supporting historical detail. Focus on the guerrilla warfare tactics and the alliance with King Sweyn's Danish fleet.
    2. 2.Step 2: Identify Feature 2 and provide supporting historical detail. Focus on the betrayal by local monks or William's siege bridge across the Fens to storm the island.
    3. 3.Step 3: Check that each feature has one identified point and one developed, specific detail to achieve 2 marks per feature.
    Final Answer: Feature 1: Hereward used the natural fenland terrain around the Isle of Ely to conduct guerrilla strikes, including the raiding and sacking of Peterborough Abbey alongside Danish allies in 1070 to prevent its treasures falling into Norman hands. Feature 2: William defeated the rebellion by building a wooden causeway through the marshland and securing a secret pathway revealed by local monks, allowing Norman troops to capture the island while Morcar surrendered and Hereward escaped.
    Active Recall Memory Test
    What promise did William break to Earl Edwin that contributed to the 1068 rebellion?
    Key Fact: William broke his promise to allow Edwin to marry his daughter and reduced the territory of Edwin's earldom.
    Which newly appointed Norman Earl of Northumbria was murdered in Durham in January 1069?
    Key Fact: Robert Cumin (also referred to as Robert de Commines).
    How did William convince the Danish fleet to abandon the Ely rebellion and leave England in 1070?
    Key Fact: William paid them a large sum of money (Danegeld) and granted them permission to pillage the eastern coast before sailing home.
    What Latin term is used in the 1086 Domesday Book to describe the ruined state of Yorkshire estates?
    Key Fact: 'Vastum' (meaning 'waste').
    Frequently Asked Questions
    Why did the Anglo-Saxons fail to defeat William during the rebellions of 1068 to 1071?
    Anglo-Saxon resistance failed because it was geographically scattered, poorly coordinated, and led by figures with conflicting motives rather than a single unified strategy. William possessed superior mobility, built defensive motte-and-bailey castles across rebellious regions, and used targeted brutality alongside bribes to isolate rebels from foreign allies like the Danes.
    What role did Edgar Aethling play in the rebellions?
    Edgar Aethling was the grandson of King Edmund Ironside and held the strongest hereditary blood claim to the English crown. After fleeing William's court in 1068, he sought refuge with King Malcolm III of Scotland and became the figurehead of the 1069 northern rebellions, uniting northern English rebels with Danish reinforcements before William crushed the uprising.
    Why did King Sweyn of Denmark send ships to help the English rebels?
    Sweyn Estrithsson claimed the English crown based on past Scandinavian rule under King Cnut and saw William's instability as an opportunity to reclaim influence or territory. However, Sweyn was primarily motivated by wealth and plunder, which is why William was repeatedly able to bribe the Danish fleet with Danegeld to abandon their Saxon allies.
    How did the Harrying of the North change William's policy towards English nobles?
    Prior to 1069, William attempted to rule collaboratively by allowing cooperative Anglo-Saxon earls such as Edwin, Morcar, and Waltheof to retain their titles and lands. The northern uprisings convinced William that the English aristocracy could never be trusted, prompting a systematic replacement of English thegns and earls with Norman tenants-in-chief.
    Why was the Isle of Ely such a difficult stronghold for William to attack?
    In the 11th century, Ely was surrounded by vast, treacherous marshlands and deep water channels accessible only by narrow causeways known solely to locals. Hereward used this inaccessible fenland geography to stage surprise guerrilla attacks and retreat safely, forcing William to spend months constructing an engineered timber causeway across the bogs to reach him.