Option P5: Key topic 2: The escalating conflict, 1964–73 - 1 The Six Day War, 1967 — Edexcel GCSE History
Test yourself on Option P5: Key topic 2: The escalating conflict, 1964–73 - 1 The Six Day War, 1967 with PEARSON EDEXCEL GCSE practice questions.
7 days Premium · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge
Option P5: Key topic 2: The escalating conflict, 1964–73 - 1 The Six Day War, 1967 explained
The 1964 Cairo Conference was significant as Arab leaders agreed to divert the River Jordan's headwaters to deny Israel water, and established the PLO.
Read the full explanation
This escalated tensions, particularly with Syria, which actively supported Fatah's guerrilla raids into Israel. In November 1966, Israel retaliated with a massive raid on the Jordanian village of Samu, destroying homes and killing Jordanian soldiers. This destabilised King Hussein's regime and drew Arab criticism of Nasser for inaction. Tensions culminated on 7 April 1967, when an artillery clash over the demilitarised zone led to an aerial dogfight. Israel shot down six Syrian MiG fighter jets and flew low over Damascus, deeply humiliating Syria and accelerating the path to the Six Day War.
The actions of the USSR, Nasser and the USA in the period leading to war.
In the build-up to the 1967 Six Day War, the USSR played a critical role by providing false intelligence to Egypt on 13 May, claiming Israel was massing troops on the Syrian border. This prompted Nasser to take decisive actions to maintain his leadership of the Arab world. Nasser mobilised the Egyptian army into the Sinai Peninsula, expelled the UN Emergency Force (UNEF) peacekeepers, and closed the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping on 22 May, an act Israel considered a casus belli. Meanwhile, the USA attempted diplomatic resolutions but ultimately signalled to Israel that it would not intervene to stop a preemptive Israeli strike. These combined actions—Soviet misinformation, Nasser's brinkmanship, and tacit US approval—created an unavoidable path to the outbreak of war.
Key events of the war.
The Six Day War (5-10 June 1967) began with Operation Focus, a preemptive Israeli airstrike that destroyed the Egyptian air force on the ground. Without air cover, Egyptian forces in the Sinai Peninsula were rapidly defeated by Israeli armour, reaching the Suez Canal within days. Jordan attacked Israel, leading to Israeli forces capturing East Jerusalem and the West Bank. Finally, Israel launched an offensive against Syria, capturing the heavily fortified Golan Heights. The war ended with a UN-brokered ceasefire, leaving Israel in control of vast new territories and fundamentally altering the balance of power in the Middle East.
Your focus
- Evaluate the strategic decisions made at the 1964 Cairo Conference.
- Analyse the impact of Syrian support for Fatah and the Israeli raid on Samu on regional stability.
- Describe the events of 7 April 1967 and explain their role in triggering the Six Day War.
Show all 9 objectives
- Explain the impact of Soviet intelligence on Egyptian military decisions in May 1967.
- Analyse the significance of Nasser's actions in Sinai and the Straits of Tiran.
- Evaluate the role of the USA in shaping Israel's decision to launch a preemptive strike.
- Outline the chronological sequence of key events during the Six Day War.
- Explain the significance of the preemptive Israeli airstrike on the Egyptian air force.
- Identify the specific territories captured by Israel and the nations they were captured from.
Option P5: Key topic 2: The escalating conflict, 1964–73 - 1 The Six Day War, 1967 exam tips
Quick Revision Summary (Key Takeaway)
The Six Day War of June 1967 was a decisive conflict in which Israel executed a pre-emptive air strike against massing Arab forces, destroying their air capabilities. In under a week, Israel captured the Sinai Peninsula, Gaza Strip, West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights, fundamentally altering Middle Eastern borders and triggering UN Resolution 242.
Topic Overview
The Six Day War (5–10 June 1967) was a transformative watershed in the modern Middle East, reshaping the political map and redrawing the battle lines of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Following weeks of escalating rhetoric, troop mobilisations in the Sinai, and the closure of the Straits of Tiran by Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, Israel launched a devastating pre-emptive strike, Operation Focus, that wiped out Arab air superiority within hours.
The subsequent ground campaigns resulted in comprehensive Israeli victories over Egypt, Jordan, and Syria, quadrupling Israeli-held territory through the capture of the Sinai, Gaza Strip, West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights. This decisive victory radically altered regional dynamics, displaced hundreds of thousands of additional Palestinian refugees, gave rise to independent Palestinian militancy under the PLO, and established the contentious framework of 'land for peace' embodied in UN Resolution 242.
Key Concepts
- →Operation Focus: The devastating pre-emptive Israeli air strike on the morning of 5 June 1967 that eliminated the Egyptian Air Force on the ground.
- →Egyptian Brinkmanship: Nasser's aggressive political manoeuvres in May 1967, including expelling the United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF) and blockading the Straits of Tiran.
- →Strategic Buffer Zones: The newly captured territories (Sinai, Golan Heights, West Bank) that protected Israeli population centres from direct artillery and tank strikes.
- →UN Resolution 242: The United Nations framework passed in November 1967 demanding Israeli withdrawal from occupied territories in exchange for recognized boundaries and lasting peace ('land for peace').
- →The Khartoum Resolution: The September 1967 Arab summit that solidified regional defiance with the 'Three No's': no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, and no negotiations with Israel.
Marking Points
- Explain the outcomes of the 1964 Cairo Conference, including the PLO's creation and the water diversion plan.
- Describe Syria's role in escalating tensions by sponsoring Fatah's cross-border guerrilla attacks.
- Detail the events and consequences of the Israeli raid on Samu in 1966, including its impact on Jordan.
- Analyse the significance of the 7 April 1967 dogfight, where Israel destroyed six Syrian MiGs, in precipitating war.
- Identify the USSR's role in supplying false intelligence regarding Israeli troop movements to Egypt.
- Explain Nasser's three key escalatory steps: moving troops into Sinai, expelling UNEF, and closing the Straits of Tiran.
- Describe the USA's diplomatic stance and its eventual tacit green light for Israeli preemptive action.
- Evaluate how the interaction between superpower politics and regional brinkmanship made war inevitable.
- Identify the preemptive Israeli airstrike (Operation Focus) on 5 June 1967 that destroyed the Egyptian air force.
- Describe the rapid Israeli advance through the Sinai Peninsula to the Suez Canal.
- Explain the capture of East Jerusalem and the West Bank from Jordanian forces.
- Detail the Israeli assault on the Golan Heights, capturing it from Syria.
- Note the UN ceasefire on 10 June 1967 that ended the conflict.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Link the events of 7 April 1967 directly to the pressure placed on Nasser to defend his Syrian allies.
- 💡Use the Samu raid to illustrate how cross-border guerrilla attacks led to disproportionate state retaliation.
- 💡Highlight the dispute over water resources following the Cairo Conference as a key catalyst for military escalation.
- 💡Clearly sequence Nasser's actions in May 1967 to show the rapid escalation of the crisis.
- 💡Discuss the closure of the Straits of Tiran as the definitive trigger that made Israeli military action certain.
- 💡Contrast the roles of the USSR and the USA to demonstrate how Cold War dynamics influenced the Middle East conflict.
- 💡Use a timeline to sequence the events clearly, starting with the airstrikes on Egypt.
- 💡When explaining the outcome, link the military events directly to the territorial changes.
- 💡Be prepared to explain how the events of the war demonstrated Israeli military superiority.
- 💡Use accurate geographical terminology: clearly distinguish between the West Bank, the Golan Heights, the Gaza Strip, and the Sinai Peninsula in every analytical paragraph.
- 💡Explicitly trace causality by explaining why an action left the opponent no choice; for instance, explain that closing the Straits of Tiran constituted an internationally recognized casus belli (act of war).
- 💡When evaluating the consequences, balance the immediate military triumph for Israel against the long-term demographic, administrative, and security challenges of ruling over a hostile occupied population.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing the location of the Samu raid; correction: The Samu raid took place in the Jordanian-controlled West Bank, not in Syria.
- Assuming the Cairo Conference was a peace summit; correction: The conference aimed to coordinate Arab opposition to Israel, including military and economic strategies.
- Stating that Fatah was an Israeli group; correction: Fatah was a Palestinian nationalist and guerrilla organisation supported by Syria.
- Believing the USSR wanted a full-scale war; correction: The USSR likely intended to deter Israel and boost its Arab allies, not spark a regional war.
- Stating the USA actively fought alongside Israel in 1967; correction: The USA provided diplomatic support and arms, but no direct military intervention.
- Thinking Nasser attacked Israel first; correction: Nasser's actions were provocative, but Israel launched the first preemptive military strike.
- Error: Stating that Egypt attacked Israel first. Correction: Israel launched a preemptive strike against Egypt, though Israel argued this was defensive due to Egyptian mobilisation.
- Error: Confusing the territories captured from each nation. Correction: Remember that Sinai and Gaza were taken from Egypt, the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan, and the Golan Heights from Syria.
- Error: Believing the war lasted longer than six days. Correction: The active combat phase was exactly six days, from 5 to 10 June 1967.
- Believing Israel launched the war without warning for pure imperialist territorial expansion, ignoring the existential threat posed by the closure of the Straits of Tiran and the massing of Arab armies on its borders.
- Assuming the West Bank and Gaza were autonomous Palestinian states in 1967, rather than territories formally annexed by Jordan and militarily administered by Egypt respectively.
- Thinking that UN Resolution 242 immediately solved the border disputes, when in reality its deliberately ambiguous English wording ('withdrawal from territories' rather than 'the territories') fostered decades of diplomatic dispute.
Revision Plan
- 1Phase 1: Map the geographical layout before and after 5 June 1967, highlighting which Arab state controlled each border region.
- 2Phase 2: Construct a May–June 1967 timeline detailing the chain reaction: Soviet intelligence leak, UNEF removal, Tiran closure, and military pacts.
- 3Phase 3: Memorise the operational mechanics of the war: Operation Focus on day 1, the three territorial fronts (South, East, North), and the ceasefires.
- 4Phase 4: Analyse post-war documents: Compare the core clauses of UN Resolution 242 with the resolutions of the Khartoum Summit.
- 5Phase 5: Practice timed 8-mark consequence questions and 12-mark causation essays using clear PEEL paragraph structures.
Exam Question Types
- 📋Explain two consequences of... [8 marks]: Focus on two distinct, detailed impacts (e.g. territorial changes, rise of Palestinian guerrilla independence, or diplomatic entrenchment).
- 📋Explain why... [12 marks]: Requires three detailed causal factors (e.g. border disputes, Nasser's brinkmanship, naval blockade) with links showing how they interacted to produce war.
- 📋Essays / 'How far do you agree' [16 marks + 4 SPaG]: Balancing multiple factors (e.g. 'Nasser's actions were the main cause of the 1967 war') with a sustained analytical judgement.
Command Word Expectations (PEARSON EDEXCEL)
Identify two distinct outcomes. Provide specific factual evidence for each and explain the explicit impact on the people, nations, or international relations involved. Do not combine them into a single narrative.
Construct an analytical explanation evaluating at least three discrete historical causes. Use explicit connective language to show how each factor contributed directly to the outcome, reaching beyond basic storytelling.
How Students Lose Marks (Examiner Pitfalls)
Step-by-Step Worked Solutions
Question: Explain two consequences of the Six Day War (1967) for the Middle East. [8 marks]
- 1.Step 1: Identify Consequence 1 (Territorial transformation and buffer zones). Explain that Israel quadrupled the territory under its control by capturing Sinai, Gaza, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights. Provide supporting detail on how this created strategic depth ('buffer zones') against future ground invasions, while simultaneously bringing over one million Palestinian Arabs under direct Israeli military occupation.
- 2.Step 2: Identify Consequence 2 (Diplomatic fallout and UN Resolution 242). Explain that the defeat led directly to the November 1967 UN Security Council Resolution 242, which established the 'land for peace' principle. Contrast this with the Arab League's Khartoum Conference in September 1967, which declared the 'Three No's' (no peace, no recognition, no negotiations with Israel), entrenching diplomatic deadlock.
- 3.Step 3: Check structure. Ensure both consequences are presented in separate, fully developed P-E-E (Point, Evidence, Explanation) paragraphs with precise historical evidence.
Question: Explain why the Six Day War broke out in June 1967. [12 marks]
- 1.Step 1: Point 1 - Syrian-Israeli border tensions and Palestinian guerrilla warfare. Discuss the escalating artillery duels over the Golan Heights, disputes over the demilitarised zone (DMZ) and water diversion projects, and cross-border raids by Fatah, culminating in the April 1967 dogfight where Israel downed six Syrian MiGs.
- 2.Step 2: Point 2 - Soviet false intelligence and Egyptian brinkmanship. Explain how the USSR falsely informed Damascus and Cairo in May 1967 that Israel was amassing troops on the Syrian border, prompting Nasser to project Arab leadership by expelling the UNEF from the Sinai buffer zone.
- 3.Step 3: Point 3 - The immediate casus belli: Straits of Tiran and military encirclement. Analyze Nasser's closure of the Straits of Tiran on 22 May, cutting off Israeli oil imports via Eilat, followed by the Egyptian-Jordanian-Iraqi military pacts, which convinced Israeli ministers that a defensive pre-emptive strike was necessary.
- 4.Step 4: Conclusion/Links - Synthesize how long-term border radicalisation combined with Egyptian diplomatic miscalculations to create an unavoidable spiral toward pre-emptive war.