Tort — AQA A-Level Law Revision

    The study of liability in negligence for physical injury to people and damage to property, focusing on the establishment of a duty of care, the breach of t

    Topic Synopsis

    The study of liability in negligence for physical injury to people and damage to property, focusing on the establishment of a duty of care, the breach of that duty, and the resulting damage.

    Key Concepts & Core Principles

    Exam Tips & Revision Strategies

    Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid

    Examiner Marking Points

    Tort

    AQA
    A-Level

    The study of liability in negligence for physical injury to people and damage to property, focusing on the establishment of a duty of care, the breach of that duty, and the resulting damage.

    0
    Objectives
    20
    Exam Tips
    8
    Pitfalls
    27
    Key Terms
    36
    Mark Points

    Subtopics in this area

    Liability in negligence for physical injury to people and damage to property
    Liability in negligence for economic loss and psychiatric injury
    Occupiers' liability
    Nuisance and the escape of dangerous things
    Theory of tort law
    Defences
    Vicarious liability
    Remedies

    Topic Overview

    Tort law is a core component of AQA A-Level Law, focusing on civil wrongs that cause harm or loss to individuals. Unlike criminal law, which punishes offenders, tort law aims to provide remedies—typically damages—to restore the claimant to their pre-tort position. The most significant tort is negligence, which requires proof of duty of care, breach, and causation. Understanding tort is essential because it governs everyday situations, from car accidents to medical malpractice, and shapes how liability is allocated in society.

    The topic covers key torts such as negligence, occupiers' liability, nuisance, and defamation, each with specific rules and defences. Students must grasp the landmark case of Donoghue v Stevenson [1932], which established the neighbour principle for duty of care. Tort law also intersects with concepts like vicarious liability, where employers are held responsible for employees' actions. Mastering tort requires careful analysis of facts, application of legal principles, and evaluation of policy considerations, such as floodgates arguments and compensation culture.

    In the A-Level exam, tort questions often present a scenario requiring students to advise a party on potential claims or defences. Success demands a structured approach: identify the tort, establish elements, apply case law, and consider remedies. Tort law also develops critical thinking about fault, risk, and justice. It is a dynamic area, with recent developments in psychiatric harm and pure economic loss, making it both challenging and rewarding for students.

    Key Concepts

    Core ideas you must understand for this topic

    • →Duty of care: The legal obligation to avoid causing harm, established via the Caparo three-stage test (foreseeability, proximity, and fairness).
    • →Breach of duty: Determined by the objective 'reasonable man' test, considering factors like likelihood of harm and social utility.
    • →Causation: Both factual causation (the 'but for' test) and legal causation (remoteness, with the Wagon Mound test for reasonable foreseeability).
    • →Defences: Contributory negligence (reduces damages by percentage), volenti non fit injuria (consent to risk), and illegality (ex turpi causa).
    • →Remedies: Damages (compensatory, aggravated, or exemplary) and injunctions (prohibitory or mandatory).

    What You Need to Demonstrate

    Key skills and knowledge for this topic

    • Duty of care: the 'neighbour' principle
    • Duty of care: the Caparo three-part test
    • Breach of duty: the objective standard of care
    • Damage: factual causation
    • Damage: legal causation (remoteness of damage)
    • Distinction between pure economic loss and consequential economic loss
    • Liability for negligent misstatement (Hedley Byrne v Heller principles)
    • Liability for pure economic loss caused by negligent acts

    Marking Points

    Key points examiners look for in your answers

    • Duty of care: the 'neighbour' principle
    • Duty of care: the Caparo three-part test
    • Breach of duty: the objective standard of care
    • Damage: factual causation
    • Damage: legal causation (remoteness of damage)
    • Distinction between pure economic loss and consequential economic loss
    • Liability for negligent misstatement (Hedley Byrne v Heller principles)
    • Liability for pure economic loss caused by negligent acts
    • Definition and criteria for primary victims in psychiatric injury claims
    • Definition and criteria for secondary victims in psychiatric injury claims (Alcock criteria)
    • Requirement for a medically recognised psychiatric condition
    • Liability in respect of visitors under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957
    • Liability in respect of trespassers under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984
    • Definition and elements of private nuisance
    • The rule in Rylands v Fletcher
    • Application of defences specific to private nuisance and Rylands v Fletcher
    • Application of remedies including injunctions and compensatory damages
    • Application of the Caparo three-part test for duty of care in claims for physical injury and property damage
    • Analysis of policy factors regarding liability for pure economic loss and psychiatric injury
    • Evaluation of the objective standard of care in negligence
    • Analysis of factors governing the grant of injunctions and balancing conflicting interests
    • Explanation of the nature and purpose of vicarious liability
    • Identification of the relevant defence based on the scenario facts
    • Application of the legal principles of contributory negligence
    • Application of the legal principles of consent (volenti non fit injuria)
    • Application of specific defences for private nuisance
    • Application of specific defences for the rule in Rylands v Fletcher
    • Construction of a legal argument regarding the success or failure of the defence
    • Nature and purpose of vicarious liability
    • Testing employment status
    • Other areas of vicarious liability
    • Identification of compensatory damages for physical injury, property damage, and economic loss
    • Explanation of the principle of mitigation of loss
    • Explanation of the nature and purpose of injunctions
    • Application of remedy principles to hypothetical scenarios
    • Evaluation of the effectiveness of remedies in balancing conflicting interests

    Examiner Tips

    Expert advice for maximising your marks

    • 💡Always identify whether the loss is 'pure' economic loss or consequential to physical damage first
    • 💡When dealing with psychiatric injury, clearly state whether the claimant is a primary or secondary victim before applying the relevant tests
    • 💡Ensure you reference the specific policy factors mentioned in the specification regarding the imposition of liability for these types of loss
    • 💡Use case law to support the application of the 'neighbour' principle and the Caparo test where relevant
    • 💡Ensure you can distinguish between the requirements for private nuisance and the rule in Rylands v Fletcher.
    • 💡Apply the rules to hypothetical scenarios to demonstrate AO2 skills.
    • 💡Evaluate the effectiveness of remedies like injunctions in balancing conflicting interests.
    • 💡Ensure analysis and evaluation of legal rules are supported by reasoned arguments
    • 💡Break down legal rules into constituent parts when applying them to hypothetical scenarios
    • 💡Identify and counter alternative viewpoints when evaluating legal issues
    • 💡Ensure the defence is applied specifically to the tort being discussed (e.g., distinguishing between general negligence defences and those specific to nuisance/Rylands v Fletcher)
    • 💡Use appropriate legal terminology when discussing the elements of each defence
    • 💡When advising on liability, always consider whether a partial or full defence might mitigate or negate the defendant's liability
    • 💡Ensure you can apply the tests for employment status to hypothetical scenarios.
    • 💡Be prepared to evaluate the purpose and justification of vicarious liability as a legal doctrine.
    • 💡Use appropriate legal terminology when constructing arguments regarding liability.
    • 💡Always link the chosen remedy to the specific loss identified in the scenario
    • 💡When discussing injunctions, consider the balance of interests between the parties
    • 💡Ensure you demonstrate an understanding of the mitigation principle as it is a core requirement
    • 💡Use precise legal terminology when discussing damages and equitable remedies
    • 💡Always structure your answer using the IRAC method: Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion. This ensures you cover all elements logically and maximise marks for application.
    • 💡Cite at least two cases per point to demonstrate depth of knowledge. For negligence, use Donoghue v Stevenson for duty, and Paris v Stepney Borough Council for breach (special characteristics).
    • 💡Evaluate defences and remedies critically. For example, discuss whether contributory negligence is fair in road traffic accidents, or whether damages adequately compensate for non-pecuniary loss.

    Common Mistakes

    Pitfalls to avoid in your exam answers

    • Confusing pure economic loss with economic loss consequential to physical damage
    • Failing to distinguish between primary and secondary victims in psychiatric injury cases
    • Misapplying the Alcock control mechanisms for secondary victims
    • Ignoring the requirement for a medically recognised psychiatric illness (mere grief or distress is insufficient)
    • Failing to apply the principle of mitigation of loss to the scenario
    • Confusing the different types of injunctions or their purpose
    • Miscalculating or misidentifying the heads of loss in a damages claim
    • Neglecting to link the remedy back to the specific tortious liability established
    • Misconception: 'If someone is injured, they automatically win a negligence claim.' Correction: The claimant must prove all elements: duty, breach, causation, and damage. Even if harm occurs, no liability exists if no duty is owed or breach is not proven.
    • Misconception: 'Contributory negligence means the claimant gets nothing.' Correction: It reduces damages proportionally, not eliminates them entirely. For example, if the claimant is 30% at fault, they receive 70% of damages.
    • Misconception: 'Occupiers' liability only applies to public places.' Correction: It applies to all premises, including private homes, under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 (visitors) and 1984 (trespassers).

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions students ask about this topic

    Before You Start

    Prior knowledge that will help with this topic

    • •General principles of civil law and the distinction between civil and criminal liability.
    • •Basic understanding of court hierarchy and precedent, as tort heavily relies on case law.
    • •Familiarity with statutory interpretation, as some torts (e.g., Occupiers' Liability) are governed by Acts.

    Key Terminology

    Essential terms to know

    Likely Command Words

    How questions on this topic are typically asked

    Advise
    Consider
    Discuss
    Assess
    Explain
    Suggest
    Examine

    Ready to test yourself?

    Practice questions tailored to this topic

    Related Topics in AQA A-Level Law

    Human Rights

    View Topic

    Human Rights

    View Topic

    Human Rights

    View Topic

    Human Rights

    View Topic