Knowledge of Set Works

OCR

GCSE

Candidates are required to demonstrate detailed analytical knowledge of prescribed repertoire, focusing on the manipulation of musical elements including harmony, tonality, structure, and sonority (AO3). Responses must articulate how specific devices function within the historical and stylistic context of the work, distinguishing between generic conventions and unique compositional features (AO4). High-scoring responses integrate precise musicological terminology to deconstruct the composer's intent, avoiding narrative description in favor of technical dissection.

Objectives

Exam Tips

Pitfalls

Key Terms

Mark Points

Subtopics in this area

Knowledge of Set Works

What You Need to Demonstrate

Key skills and knowledge for this topic

Award marks for precise identification of musical elements (melody, harmony, tonality, structure) using correct Italian terminology (e.g., 'allegro' not 'fast').
Credit responses that explicitly link heard features to the specific Area of Study (e.g., identifying a 'ritornello' structure in a Baroque concerto context).
In comparative questions, award marks for distinct points of similarity or difference supported by aural evidence, not merely describing each extract in isolation.
For extended responses, credit logical structure and the use of advanced terminology (e.g., 'polyphonic' rather than 'many layers') to describe texture and interplay.
Credit precise identification of structural markers (e.g., transition to codetta, recapitulation, development section) linked to specific bar numbers
Award marks for accurate harmonic analysis, specifically the identification of modulations, cadential points, and functional chord progressions using Roman numeral or chord symbol nomenclature
Responses must demonstrate understanding of instrumental techniques and textural changes (e.g., antiphony, doubling, polarization of texture) relevant to the period
Credit comparative analysis that situates the set work within its wider chronological and stylistic context, referencing specific contemporaries or influences

Example Examiner Feedback

Real feedback patterns examiners use when marking

"You have correctly identified the instrument, but you must analyse how its role changes within the texture (e.g., melodic vs. accompanying)"
"Your harmonic analysis is accurate; to access higher bands, explain the structural function of this modulation"
"Avoid generalisations about the period; reference specific stylistic conventions of the Classical or Jazz style evident in this passage"
"Use the bar numbers provided in the skeleton score to anchor your observations precisely"
"You identified the instrument correctly; to gain higher marks, describe the playing technique used (e.g., glissando, tremolo)."
"Your comparison lists features of both pieces. To improve, explicitly state the *musical relationship* (e.g., 'Extract A is diatonic whereas Extract B is chromatic')."
"Avoid generic terms like 'upbeat'. Use specific terminology such as 'anacrusis' or 'syncopation' to demonstrate AO3 precision."
"In your evaluation of the film score, link the musical device (e.g., dissonance) directly to the intended dramatic effect (e.g., tension)."

Marking Points

Key points examiners look for in your answers

Award marks for precise identification of musical elements (melody, harmony, tonality, structure) using correct Italian terminology (e.g., 'allegro' not 'fast').
Credit responses that explicitly link heard features to the specific Area of Study (e.g., identifying a 'ritornello' structure in a Baroque concerto context).
In comparative questions, award marks for distinct points of similarity or difference supported by aural evidence, not merely describing each extract in isolation.
For extended responses, credit logical structure and the use of advanced terminology (e.g., 'polyphonic' rather than 'many layers') to describe texture and interplay.
Credit precise identification of structural markers (e.g., transition to codetta, recapitulation, development section) linked to specific bar numbers
Award marks for accurate harmonic analysis, specifically the identification of modulations, cadential points, and functional chord progressions using Roman numeral or chord symbol nomenclature
Responses must demonstrate understanding of instrumental techniques and textural changes (e.g., antiphony, doubling, polarization of texture) relevant to the period
Credit comparative analysis that situates the set work within its wider chronological and stylistic context, referencing specific contemporaries or influences
Award marks for precise identification of period-specific features in AoS2, e.g., 'basso continuo', 'ritornello form', or 'teraced dynamics' in Baroque extracts.
Credit accurate recognition of non-Western instrumentation in AoS3, specifically distinguishing between culturally distinct drums (e.g., 'tabla' vs 'dhol' vs 'bongo').
In comparison questions (AO4), candidates must explicitly link musical elements (melody, harmony, tonality) to similarities or differences between extracts, rather than listing features separately.
For extended responses, award top band marks to answers that justify *why* a piece fits a genre using specific terminology (e.g., 'use of leitmotif and chromaticism suggests Film Music').

Examiner Tips

Expert advice for maximising your marks

💡Utilise the DR P SMITH mnemonic (Dynamics, Rhythm, Pitch, Structure, Melody, Instrumentation, Texture, Harmony) to systematically analyse unfamiliar extracts.
💡When asked to 'Suggest a suitable occasion' or 'Identify the genre', always justify the answer with a specific musical feature heard in the extract (e.g., 'tabla indicates Indian Classical').
💡In the extended writing question, plan the response to ensure coverage of all bullet points provided in the prompt to access the top mark band.
💡Practice 'skeleton scores'—follow the melodic contour on the page while listening to identify pitch errors or rhythmic changes accurately.
💡Memorise the structural roadmap of all Prescribed Works, including key centres for each section, to save time during the exam
💡When analysing harmony, explicitly state the relationship between the chord and the prevailing key (e.g., 'Dominant 7th of the relative minor')
💡Utilise the skeleton score provided in the exam to pinpoint specific features; annotate it immediately upon hearing the extract
💡Ensure all essay responses in Section C integrate specific musical examples from the set works to support arguments about the Area of Study
💡Utilise the DR P SMITH mnemonic (Dynamics, Rhythm, Pitch, Structure, Melody, Instrumentation, Texture, Harmony) to structure 8-mark extended responses and ensure full coverage.
💡When identifying the period of a Concerto, listen immediately for the harpsichord (Baroque) versus the piano (Classical/Romantic) as a primary discriminator.
💡In Rhythms of the World, focus on the rhythmic cycle; identify the 'tala' in Indian music or 'clave' in Latin American styles to secure context marks.
💡For 'Conventions of Pop', ensure you can distinguish between specific sub-genres (e.g., Rock Anthem vs Pop Ballad) by analysing the drum beat and vocal style.

Common Mistakes

Pitfalls to avoid in your exam answers

Describing the 'mood' or 'feeling' of the music (e.g., 'it sounds scary') instead of analysing the musical device creating that effect (e.g., 'chromaticism', 'dissonance').
Confusing specific genres within Areas of Study, such as misidentifying Bhangra as Bollywood or Calypso as Samba due to lack of attention to specific instrumentation.
Listing features that are typical of a genre but not actually present in the specific extract heard (rote learning error).
Confusing 'texture' (layers of sound) with 'dynamics' (volume) or 'tempo' (speed) in written descriptions.
Providing a narrative 'blow-by-blow' description of the music rather than a focused analysis of the elements requested
Vague reference to locations (e.g., 'near the middle') instead of using specific bar numbers or rehearsal marks
Confusing specific harmonic terminology, particularly distinguishing between modulation, tonicisation, and simple chord changes
Asserting emotional intent (e.g., 'it sounds sad') without providing the technical musical justification (e.g., 'use of minor sixth, slow tempo, descending melodic contour')
Confusing 'texture' with 'instrumentation'; candidates often list instruments when asked for textural features (e.g., failing to use terms like 'monophonic', 'homophonic', or 'polyphonic').
Vague descriptors for dynamics and tempo; examiners reject 'fast' or 'getting louder' in favor of Italian terms like 'allegro', 'vivace', or 'crescendo'.
In AoS2 (Concerto), failing to distinguish between the 'Solo Concerto' and 'Concerto Grosso' based on the relationship between the soloist(s) and the ripieno.
Describing the 'mood' of the piece (e.g., 'happy' or 'sad') without referencing the musical elements (major tonality, fast tempo) that create that effect.

Study Guide Available

Comprehensive revision notes & examples

Read Study Guide

Key Terminology

Essential terms to know

Structural Analysis (Sonata, Ritornello, Rondo, Ground Bass)

Harmonic Vocabulary and Tonal Relationships

Sonority, Texture, and Timbral Manipulation

Melodic Development and Rhythmic Devices

Analysis of Musical Elements (DR P SMITH)

Structural and Thematic Development

Contextual and Stylistic Conventions

Musical Elements (DR P SMITH/MAD T SHIRT)

Structural Analysis and Form

Contextual and Historical Understanding

Harmonic and Tonal Conventions

Likely Command Words

How questions on this topic are typically asked

Identify

Describe

Compare

Explain

Suggest

Analyse

Evaluate

Ready to test yourself?

Practice questions tailored to this topic