Problems of evil and suffering — Edexcel A-Level Religious Studies Revision

    This topic explores the philosophical problem of evil and suffering, focusing on the challenge it poses to the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and

    Topic Synopsis

    This topic explores the philosophical problem of evil and suffering, focusing on the challenge it poses to the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God. It covers the nature of evil, various theodicies, and solutions to the problem of suffering.

    Key Concepts & Core Principles

    Exam Tips & Revision Strategies

    Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid

    Examiner Marking Points

    Problems of evil and suffering

    EDEXCEL
    A-Level

    This topic explores the philosophical problem of evil and suffering, focusing on the challenge it poses to the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God. It covers the nature of evil, various theodicies, and solutions to the problem of suffering.

    0
    Objectives
    5
    Exam Tips
    5
    Pitfalls
    3
    Key Terms
    7
    Mark Points

    Topic Overview

    The problem of evil and suffering is one of the most significant challenges to religious belief, particularly within theistic traditions like Christianity and Islam. It questions how an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient God can allow evil and suffering to exist. This topic is central to the Edexcel A-Level Religious Studies course, as it explores philosophical arguments (the logical and evidential problems) and theological responses (theodicies and free will defences). Understanding this debate is crucial for evaluating the coherence of theism and for engaging with broader issues of morality, justice, and the nature of God.

    The topic is divided into two main types of evil: moral evil (caused by human actions, e.g., murder, war) and natural evil (caused by natural processes, e.g., earthquakes, disease). Philosophers like Epicurus, David Hume, and J.L. Mackie have formulated powerful arguments against the existence of God based on evil, while theologians like Augustine, Irenaeus, and Alvin Plantinga have developed responses. The debate also involves modern thinkers such as John Hick and Richard Swinburne, who offer soul-making and free will defences. Mastery of this topic requires critical analysis of these arguments and an ability to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses.

    This topic fits into the wider subject by connecting to themes of the nature of God, religious experience, and the problem of religious language. It also links to ethical theories (e.g., utilitarianism, Kantian ethics) when considering responses to suffering. For A-Level students, engaging with the problem of evil develops skills in logical reasoning, evaluation of evidence, and understanding of diverse perspectives. It is a high-scoring area if students can demonstrate precise knowledge of key thinkers and nuanced evaluation.

    Key Concepts

    Core ideas you must understand for this topic

    • →The logical problem of evil: Argues that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of an omnipotent, omnibenevolent God (e.g., J.L. Mackie's inconsistent triad).
    • →The evidential problem of evil: Argues that the amount and distribution of evil in the world makes God's existence improbable (e.g., William Rowe's example of a fawn dying in a forest fire).
    • →Theodicies: Attempts to justify God's goodness despite evil, such as Augustine's free will theodicy (evil as privation) and Irenaeus's soul-making theodicy (evil as necessary for spiritual development).
    • →Free will defence: Argues that moral evil results from human free will, which is a greater good that justifies allowing evil (e.g., Alvin Plantinga's 'transworld depravity').
    • →Natural evil: Suffering caused by natural events; some theodicies argue it is a result of the Fall (Augustine) or a necessary part of a world with regular laws (Swinburne).

    What You Need to Demonstrate

    Key skills and knowledge for this topic

    • The nature of the problem of evil across religious traditions
    • Distinction between moral and non-moral evil
    • The logical challenge to the existence of God posed by the inconsistency of the nature of God and the existence of evil
    • Augustinian theodicy: evil as privation, the fall of angels and humans, misuse of free will, soul-deciding
    • Irenaean theodicy: vale of soul-making, free will defence, epistemic distance, eschatological justification
    • Process theodicy: God as co-sufferer who cannot coerce free will
    • Strengths and weaknesses of theodicies regarding modern views on origins of life, nature of God, and innocent suffering

    Marking Points

    Key points examiners look for in your answers

    • The nature of the problem of evil across religious traditions
    • Distinction between moral and non-moral evil
    • The logical challenge to the existence of God posed by the inconsistency of the nature of God and the existence of evil
    • Augustinian theodicy: evil as privation, the fall of angels and humans, misuse of free will, soul-deciding
    • Irenaean theodicy: vale of soul-making, free will defence, epistemic distance, eschatological justification
    • Process theodicy: God as co-sufferer who cannot coerce free will
    • Strengths and weaknesses of theodicies regarding modern views on origins of life, nature of God, and innocent suffering

    Examiner Tips

    Expert advice for maximising your marks

    • 💡Ensure you can clearly define 'privatio boni' when discussing Augustine
    • 💡When discussing Process theodicy, emphasize that God is not omnipotent in the traditional sense
    • 💡Always link theodicies back to the specific challenge posed by the nature of God (omnipotence, omniscience, omnibenevolence)
    • 💡Use the provided anthology extracts to support your arguments in Section B
    • 💡Ensure you can compare the different approaches of Augustine and Irenaeus directly
    • 💡Always define key terms (e.g., omnipotence, omnibenevolence) and distinguish between logical and evidential problems. This shows precise understanding and gains AO1 marks.
    • 💡For evaluation (AO2), avoid one-sided arguments. Acknowledge strengths and weaknesses of each position, and use specific scholars (e.g., Mackie vs. Plantinga) to support your points.
    • 💡Use real-world examples (e.g., the Holocaust for moral evil, the 2004 tsunami for natural evil) to illustrate arguments, but ensure they are relevant and not overly emotive.

    Common Mistakes

    Pitfalls to avoid in your exam answers

    • Confusing the logical problem of evil with the evidential problem of evil
    • Failing to distinguish between moral and natural (non-moral) evil
    • Misrepresenting the Augustinian theodicy as a 'soul-making' argument
    • Overlooking the role of 'epistemic distance' in Irenaean theodicy
    • Neglecting to evaluate the compatibility of theodicies with modern scientific understandings
    • Misconception: The problem of evil only applies to Christianity. Correction: It challenges all theistic religions that affirm God's omnipotence and omnibenevolence, including Islam and Judaism.
    • Misconception: Theodicies prove that God exists. Correction: Theodicies are attempts to show that evil does not disprove God's existence; they are defensive, not positive proofs.
    • Misconception: Free will defence explains all evil. Correction: It primarily addresses moral evil; natural evil requires separate explanations (e.g., soul-making or law-governed universe).

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions students ask about this topic

    Before You Start

    Prior knowledge that will help with this topic

    • •Basic understanding of the nature of God in theism (omnipotence, omnibenevolence, omniscience).
    • •Familiarity with philosophical argumentation (deductive vs. inductive reasoning).
    • •Knowledge of key religious concepts like free will and the Fall (for Augustine's theodicy).

    Key Terminology

    Essential terms to know

    Likely Command Words

    How questions on this topic are typically asked

    Analyse
    Assess
    Evaluate
    Explore
    Clarify

    Ready to test yourself?

    Practice questions tailored to this topic

    Related Topics in EDEXCEL A-Level Religious Studies

    A study of three ethical theories: Utilitarianism, Situation Ethics, and Natural Moral Law

    View Topic

    Application of ethical theories to issues of importance: War and peace, and Sexual ethics

    View Topic

    Buddhism – Practices that shape and express religious identity: Theravada and Mahayana Buddhism, and meditation

    View Topic

    Buddhism – Religion and society: The interpretation and application of ahimsa in the modern world

    View Topic
    Problems of evil and suffering — Edexcel A-Level Revision