Secularisation refers to the declining influence of religion in society. This topic evaluates evidence for and against secularisation, and analyses the imp
Topic Synopsis
Secularisation refers to the declining influence of religion in society. This topic evaluates evidence for and against secularisation, and analyses the impact of globalisation on religion. Key debates include church attendance, religious pluralism, and the rise of spirituality.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Secularisation thesis: The idea that religion is declining in modern societies, measured by church attendance, religious belief, and institutional influence. Critics argue it's too simplistic and ignores religious revival and privatisation.
- Religious organisations: Differences between churches (large, bureaucratic, inclusive), sects (small, exclusive, high commitment), denominations (midway, tolerant), and cults (loose, individualistic, often new age).
- Fundamentalism: A reaction against modernity, characterised by literal interpretation of sacred texts, strict moral codes, and often political activism. Examples include Christian fundamentalism in the US and Islamic fundamentalism in the Middle East.
- Postmodernism and religion: Argues that in late modernity, individuals pick and mix beliefs from different traditions (religious bricolage), leading to a 'spiritual marketplace' where religion becomes a lifestyle choice.
- Gender and religion: Women are generally more religious than men across most measures, but patriarchal religions often subordinate women. Feminist theories (e.g., Daly, Woodhead) explore how religion can both oppress and empower women.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Use statistics from reputable sources to support arguments.
- Discuss both sides of the debate for a balanced evaluation.
- Link globalisation to concepts like religious hybridity.
- Always frame your analysis in terms of the structure–agency debate: are individuals freely choosing (agency) or are their choices shaped by social change (structure)?
- Use evaluative phrases like 'this is supported by...' or 'however, critics argue...' to signpost assessment and directly address the command word 'evaluate'.
- Include contemporary examples (e.g., the growth of Wicca, online spirituality) to demonstrate relevance and secure application marks.
- Always structure your argument around contrasting perspectives (e.g., functionalism vs. Marxism) to demonstrate analysis.
- Use specific named theorists and studies (e.g., Weber, Bruce, Aldridge) to evidence your points.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Confusing secularisation with atheism or the decline of personal belief.
- Ignoring counter-evidence like religious revival in some regions.
- Oversimplifying globalisation's impact as purely secularising.
- Mischaracterising new religious movements as simply 'new religions', failing to recognise their distinct organisational features and relationship to modernity.
- Confusing 'spiritual shopping' with vague pick-and-mix faith, rather than analysing it as a rational, consumer-driven process embedded in late capitalism.
- Oversimplifying fundamentalism as a purely backward-looking phenomenon, neglecting its selective adaptation of modernity and its political dimensions.
Examiner Marking Points
- Define secularisation as the process of religion losing social significance.
- Evaluate evidence for secularisation, such as declining church attendance in the UK.
- Evaluate evidence against secularisation, such as the growth of Pentecostalism globally.
- Analyse how globalisation spreads religious ideas and creates new forms of spirituality.
- Award credit for demonstrating a clear distinction between world-rejecting, world-affirming, and world-accommodating NRMs using examples (e.g., Moonies vs. Scientology).
- Sustained and explicit evaluation of the concept of 'spiritual shopping' with reference to key theorists (e.g., Lyon’s Jesus in Disneyland or Heelas’s self-spirituality) and its link to consumerist identity construction.
- Effective synthesis of reasons for fundamentalist appeal, such as response to uncertainty, moral decline, or globalisation, using sociological concepts like cultural defence or reactive movements.
- Coherent use of sociological terminology (e.g., detraditionalisation, resacralisation, eclecticism) and appropriate links to wider debates (secularisation vs. resacrilisation).