The Individual Research Project (IRP) is a component of the A-level Speaking assessment where students identify a subject or key question of personal inter
Topic Synopsis
The Individual Research Project (IRP) is a component of the A-level Speaking assessment where students identify a subject or key question of personal interest related to a Spanish-speaking country. Students conduct independent research using at least two sources (one of which must be online) and demonstrate their ability to initiate, conduct, analyse, and summarise findings. This research is then presented and discussed in the speaking exam.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Choosing a focused, researchable question: Your topic must be narrow enough to cover in depth within 2 minutes but broad enough to sustain a 10-minute discussion. For example, instead of 'The Spanish Civil War', choose 'The role of women in the Spanish Civil War'.
- Using a range of authentic sources: Base your research on at least three different types of sources (e.g., news articles, documentaries, academic papers, interviews) to show depth and avoid bias. Cite specific examples, statistics, or quotes in your presentation.
- Structuring your presentation: Your 2-minute talk should have a clear introduction (state your question and why it matters), body (present key findings with evidence), and conclusion (summarise your argument or opinion). Avoid reading from notes—use bullet points or cue cards.
- Preparing for discussion: Anticipate questions on your sources, alternative viewpoints, and the wider context. Practise justifying your opinions and speculating on future developments. The examiner will probe your knowledge and ability to think on your feet.
- Demonstrating high-level language: Use complex grammatical structures (subjunctive, conditional, passive voice) and topic-specific vocabulary. Avoid simplistic language; aim for precision and fluency. Your pronunciation and intonation also matter.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Ensure the research topic allows for critical and analytical discussion rather than just factual reporting
- Prepare to defend findings and conclusions against examiner challenges
- Focus on the quality of findings rather than the quantity
- Ensure the project title and scope are clearly defined on the Candidate Record Form
- Practice responding to questions that invite evaluation of the topic's significance, impact, and value
- Use the 5-minute preparation time for the first part of the speaking exam effectively, but remember no notes are allowed for the IRP section
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Basing research on the same literary text or film used in the written assessment
- Selecting a topic that is too broad or lacks sufficient depth for critical analysis
- Providing a presentation that is merely descriptive rather than analytical
- Failing to use at least two sources or failing to include an online source
- Exceeding the 2-minute limit for the presentation
- Relying on specific advice from teachers regarding the language of the presentation or discussion
Examiner Marking Points
- Presentation of key findings (up to 2 minutes)
- Discussion of research findings (9-10 minutes)
- Ability to explain, develop, justify, and defend opinions and views
- Critical and analytical evaluation of the chosen topic
- Use of relevant factual knowledge to support arguments
- Effective marshalling of knowledge in response to examiner challenges
- Use of at least two sources (one must be online)