This element focuses on the specialist skills required to design, implement and evaluate individualised learning programmes for learners with dyslexia/SpLD
Topic Synopsis
This element focuses on the specialist skills required to design, implement and evaluate individualised learning programmes for learners with dyslexia/SpLD across educational stages. It emphasises the importance of evidence-based planning informed by diagnostic assessment and collaboration with key stakeholders. The practical application lies in adapting multisensory, structured teaching approaches to foster independent learning and meet specific literacy and learning targets.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- **Understanding Specific Learning Difficulties (SpLDs):** In-depth knowledge of dyslexia, dyscalculia, dyspraxia, and ADHD, including their cognitive profiles, co-occurrence, and impact on learning across the curriculum.
- **Principles of Diagnostic Assessment:** Mastery of standardised assessment tools and procedures for identifying SpLDs, interpreting assessment data, and writing comprehensive diagnostic reports that inform intervention strategies.
- **Evidence-Based Interventions:** Designing and implementing highly individualised, multisensory, structured, and cumulative teaching programmes tailored to the specific needs of learners with SpLDs, grounded in research and best practice.
- **Assistive Technology and Inclusive Practice:** Utilisation of a range of assistive technologies (e.g., text-to-speech, mind-mapping software) and strategies for differentiation and reasonable adjustments to create truly inclusive learning environments.
- **Psychological and Linguistic Theories:** Critical understanding of the theoretical underpinnings of SpLDs, such as the phonological deficit hypothesis, rapid naming deficits, and working memory models, to inform pedagogical approaches.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- In your portfolio, include annotated lesson plans with numbered references to specific diagnostic test results or background information to demonstrate clear rationale.
- When explaining how you communicated a programme, include actual examples of reports, emails or meeting minutes, and reflect on how the communication impacted the learner's progress.
- For delivering learning programmes, video evidence (with consent) is powerful; ensure it captures you using differentiated instruction and the learner responding positively.
- To evidence independent learning, provide examples of learner self-assessment tools or logs that you have taught the learner to use, and evaluative notes on their increasing autonomy.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Failing to link lesson plans directly to specific assessment data, resulting in generic activities that do not target the learner's identified gaps.
- Overlooking the need to adapt resources for different age groups; using materials that are inappropriate for adult learners, for example.
- Assuming that one multisensory activity suits all; not varying approaches to match the learner's preferred learning style.
- Neglecting to update or communicate programme changes to all involved parties, leading to inconsistency in support.
Examiner Marking Points
- Award credit for demonstrating the ability to create a detailed lesson plan that incorporates recommended accommodations (e.g., overlays, assistive technology) based on a learner's diagnostic report.
- Look for clear evidence of how planned learning outcomes are differentiated to suit the learner's stage of education and whether group dynamics are managed effectively.
- Credit should be given for producing a communication log or summary that clearly explains the learning programme and its rationale to parents, teachers or support staff.
- Assessors should expect to see strategies embedded in the delivery that explicitly teach metacognitive and study skills, prompting the learner to self-monitor and self-correct.