Research in Travel and Tourism Revision — WJEC-CBAC A-Level
Analyse tourism data using appropriate techniques. Interpret trends and patterns in data. Draw conclusions and make recommendations
Exam Tips
- Always annotate graphs and charts with concise written interpretations to demonstrate your analytical thinking.
- Structure your response by first describing the trend, then explaining potential reasons, and finally evaluating the implications for the sector.
- Use precise data references (e.g., “visitor numbers increased by 12% from 2019 to 2020”) to substantiate every conclusion drawn.
- When making recommendations, explicitly state how each proposal addresses a specific finding from your data analysis.
- Use specific tourism industry examples, such as visitor exit surveys or TripAdvisor reviews analysis, to anchor your discussion.
- When evaluating suitability, always link your reasoning to the research objectives and the type of data required (e.g., numerical trends vs. in-depth opinions).
- In extended writing, structure your response to first define, then explain, and finally evaluate with balanced arguments, considering both strengths and limitations.
- Always explicitly link research findings to specific management actions, using industry terms like yield management or brand repositioning to demonstrate applied understanding.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing correlation with causation, such as assuming a single event directly caused a trend without considering other factors.
- Failing to account for external variables (e.g., economic conditions, exchange rates) when interpreting data patterns.
- Presenting recommendations that are generic or not grounded in the specific data analysis provided.
- Overlooking seasonal adjustments, leading to misinterpretation of month-on-month changes as overall growth or decline.
- Confusing the source of data with the method; for example, assuming that all online surveys are primary research, even if the data is from a third-party database (secondary).
- Treating quantitative and qualitative as mutually exclusive, overlooking mixed-methods approaches common in tourism studies.
Key Marking Points
- Award credit for accurate application of analytical techniques (e.g., calculating percentage change, moving averages) to tourism data sets.
- Look for clear identification and explanation of trends, supported by specific data points.
- Reward demonstration of critical evaluation of data sources, including commentary on sample size, bias, or data collection methods.
- Require explicit links between analysis and recommendations, showing a logical progression from evidence to proposed actions.
- Award credit for clearly defining and providing relevant examples of primary and secondary research within tourism contexts.
- Demonstrate understanding by explaining the characteristics of quantitative (numerical, measurable) and qualitative (descriptive, in-depth) methods with tourism-specific illustrations.
- Evaluate suitability by comparing and contrasting methods for a given research scenario, using criteria such as reliability, validity, cost, and depth of insight.
- Award credit for demonstrating how qualitative and quantitative data influence strategic choices, such as destination marketing or resource allocation, with reference to specific tourism contexts.