Non-cognitivism
What Non-cognitivism means in Philosophy A-Level, as defined for AQA.
Definitions of Non-cognitivism
Exam boards and our study guides word this term in slightly different ways. Learn the version your board uses.
Check what you remember
Read the wording for your board, then hide it and explain Non-cognitivism in your own words. Rough notes are fine. This is a self-check, with no mark or grade.
Reference: AQA
The view that religious utterances do not express factual beliefs but something else, such as attitudes, commitments, emotions or a way of life.
The view that moral statements express attitudes, emotions or prescriptions rather than beliefs, so they are not truth-apt in the same way.
The view that moral judgements do not state facts and are not true or false in the way descriptive claims are.
The view that moral judgements express attitudes or prescriptions rather than beliefs about facts.
The view that moral utterances do not express beliefs and are not truth-apt.
Topics that use Non-cognitivism
- Meta-ethics (AQA A-Level)
- Religious language (AQA A-Level)
Related terms
- Cognitivism
- Argument from queerness
- Argument from relativity
- Belief versus desire/passion
- Cognitivism and truth-aptness
- Contrast between verification and falsification
- Descriptive versus normative language
- Emotion and attitudes as a source of moral principles
Using Non-cognitivism in the exam
Check the command word and mark scheme for your exact question. After comparing your explanation with the reference, use the term in an answer on the linked topic. This practice does not predict an exam mark.
Practise Philosophy questions
Create a free account to answer exam-style questions on this topic and get feedback on your answers.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge