Philosophy A-Level
Rule utilitarianism and indirect defences
What Rule utilitarianism and indirect defences means in Philosophy A-Level, as defined for AQA.
Definition of Rule utilitarianism and indirect defences
Check what you remember
Read the wording for your board, then hide it and explain Rule utilitarianism and indirect defences in your own words. Rough notes are fine. This is a self-check, with no mark or grade.
Reference: AQA
The response that rule utilitarianism can accommodate special obligations, and that partiality often produces the greatest overall happiness.
Topics that use Rule utilitarianism and indirect defences
- Normative ethical theories (AQA A-Level)
Related terms
- Acting from duty
- Conditional versus unconditional commands
- Consequences as the determinant of moral value
- Consequentialism
- Contradiction in conception
- Contradiction in will
- Demandingness and alienation
- Doctrine of the mean
Using Rule utilitarianism and indirect defences in the exam
Check the command word and mark scheme for your exact question. After comparing your explanation with the reference, use the term in an answer on the linked topic. This practice does not predict an exam mark.
Practise Philosophy questions
Create a free account to answer exam-style questions on this topic and get feedback on your answers.
Start free
All Philosophy A-Level termsA week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge