Philosophy A-Level
Validity of inferences
What Validity of inferences means in Philosophy A-Level, as defined for AQA.
Definition of Validity of inferences
Check what you remember
Read the wording for your board, then hide it and explain Validity of inferences in your own words. Rough notes are fine. This is a self-check, with no mark or grade.
Reference: AQA
Affirming the antecedent and denying the consequent are valid inferences, whereas affirming the consequent and denying the antecedent are invalid.
Topics that use Validity of inferences
- Subject content: Philosophical terminology (AQA A-Level)
Related terms
- A priori knowledge
- A priori/a posteriori distinction
- Analytic/synthetic distinction
- Certainty versus necessity
- Claim type versus truth value
- Consistency
- Containment of predicate in subject
- Contradiction as a test for analyticity
Using Validity of inferences in the exam
Check the command word and mark scheme for your exact question. After comparing your explanation with the reference, use the term in an answer on the linked topic. This practice does not predict an exam mark.
Practise Philosophy questions
Create a free account to answer exam-style questions on this topic and get feedback on your answers.
Start free
All Philosophy A-Level termsA week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge