AQA · A-Level · Chemistry

    Course version: 7405 · Version from Sept 2016

    ∆H, whilst important, is not sufficient to explain feasible change.

    Full specification wording

    Gibbs free-energy change, ∆G, and entropy change, ∆S (A-level only): ∆H, whilst important, is not sufficient to explain feasible change.

    It is tempting to assume that only exothermic reactions happen, because systems tend to fall to lower energy.

    Checked against the AQA 7405 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 1 of 6
    • 4 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    It is tempting to assume that only exothermic reactions happen, because systems tend to fall to lower energy. Plenty of everyday chemistry refutes this. Ammonium nitrate dissolves readily in water even though the process absorbs about 26 kJ mol⁻¹ and the solution turns cold; ice melts above 0 °C while taking energy in; thermal decompositions such as that of calcium carbonate proceed at high temperature despite being endothermic. So the sign of ∆H, on its own, is not a reliable test of whether a change will happen. Something else is pushing these processes forward, namely the increase in the dispersal of energy and matter when an ordered solid becomes free moving particles, and that contribution grows with temperature.

    What earns the marks

    • Stating that an endothermic process can still occur spontaneously.
    • Quoting a named example, such as ammonium nitrate dissolving or a thermal decomposition.
    • Identifying entropy change as the missing factor.
    • Recognising that the temperature determines how much weight that factor carries.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Asserting that all endothermic reactions are infeasible.

    • Treating a large negative ∆H as a guarantee that a reaction will occur at any temperature.

    • Confusing feasibility with the rate at which a reaction occurs.

    • Saying an endothermic process is feasible because it absorbs energy from the surroundings, without invoking entropy.

    • Claiming ∆H is irrelevant, when it is one of the two terms in the balance.

    Exam tips

    • Keep a worked example in mind, such as ammonium nitrate dissolving with ∆H positive and the process still spontaneous.
    • Answer feasibility questions with ∆G, never with ∆H alone.
    • Remember that feasible means thermodynamically possible, not observable in the lab.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the Gibbs free-energy change, ∆G, and entropy change, ∆S (A-level only): ∆H, whilst important, is not sufficient to explain feasible change. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    Which quantity must be considered alongside enthalpy change to decide whether a reaction is feasible?

    Listen

    It is tempting to assume that only exothermic reactions happen, because systems tend to fall to lower energy. Plenty of everyday chemistry refutes this. Ammonium nitrate dissolves readily in water even though the process absorbs about 26 kJ mol⁻¹ and the solution turns cold; ice melts above 0 °C while taking energy in; thermal decompositions such as that of calcium carbonate proceed at high temperature despite being endothermic. So the sign of ∆H, on its own, is not a reliable test of whether a change will happen. Something else is pushing these processes forward, namely the increase in the dispersal of energy and matter when an ordered solid becomes free moving particles, and that contribution grows with temperature. A strong answer earns marks for these points. stating that an endothermic process can still occur spontaneously. quoting a named example, such as ammonium nitrate dissolving or a thermal decomposition. identifying entropy change as the missing factor. recognising that the temperature determines how much weight that factor carries. Exam tip: Keep a worked example in mind, such as ammonium nitrate dissolving with ∆H positive and the process still spontaneous.

    See it

    A top-down flowchart. The top node reads 'Sign of ∆H alone' and points down to 'Not sufficient to explain feasible change'. From that node two branches descend. The left branch leads to 'Endothermic processes can still occur spontaneously', which then splits into three example nodes: 'Ammonium nitrate dissolving', 'Ice melting above 0 °C' and 'Thermal decomposition of calcium carbonate'. The right branch leads to 'Entropy change: missing factor', which points down to 'Increase in dispersal of energy and matter', which in turn points down to 'Contribution grows with temperature'.
    It shows that the sign of ∆H alone is not sufficient to explain feasible change, because endothermic processes can still occur spontaneously, with entropy change as the missing factor whose contribution grows with temperature.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    limits of the enthalpy criterion

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    spontaneous endothermic processes

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    entropy as the missing term

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    role of temperature

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    limits of the enthalpy criterion
    The sign of ∆H, on its own, is not a reliable test of whether a change will happen.
    spontaneous endothermic processes
    An endothermic process can still occur spontaneously, for example ammonium nitrate dissolving in water or a thermal decomposition.
    entropy as the missing term
    The increase in the dispersal of energy and matter when an ordered solid becomes free moving particles is the missing factor pushing these processes forward.
    role of temperature
    The contribution from the increase in dispersal of energy and matter grows with temperature, so temperature determines how much weight that factor carries.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A top-down flowchart. The top node reads 'Sign of ∆H alone' and points down to 'Not sufficient to explain feasible change'. From that node two branches descend. The left branch leads to 'Endothermic processes can still occur spontaneously', which then splits into three example nodes: 'Ammonium nitrate dissolving', 'Ice melting above 0 °C' and 'Thermal decomposition of calcium carbonate'. The right branch leads to 'Entropy change: missing factor', which points down to 'Increase in dispersal of energy and matter', which in turn points down to 'Contribution grows with temperature'.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of Gibbs free-energy change, ∆G, and entropy change, ∆S (A-level only): ∆H, whilst important, is not sufficient to explain feasible change.

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge