AQA · A-Level · English Language

    Course version: 7702 · Version from Sept 2017

    Theories and research about language development.

    Full specification wording

    Children’s language development: theories and research about language development.

    This topic requires thorough knowledge of major theories and research about how children acquire spoken language.

    Checked against the AQA 7702 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 5 of 5
    • 4 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    This topic requires thorough knowledge of major theories and research about how children acquire spoken language. Research evidence encompasses longitudinal child language corpora, universal stages of acquisition (babbling, holophrastic, two-word, telegraphic), and studies of atypical development.

    What earns the marks

    • Identify a named theory of language development and state its central claim about how children acquire language.
    • Describe research evidence that supports or challenges a given theory, such as data on stages of acquisition or atypical development.
    • Distinguish between theories on a key issue, for example whether acquisition depends mainly on input, innate capacity or social interaction.
    • Apply a theory to a described example of a child's language use and explain what the theory predicts or explains.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Confusing behaviourist and innatist claims.

      Put it right: Behaviourism explains acquisition through imitation and reinforcement; innatism explains it through an innate language capacity.

    • Treating one theory as fully proven.

      Put it right: Each theory has supporting evidence and limitations, and exam answers should acknowledge both.

    • Describing a study without linking it to a theoretical claim.

      Put it right: State what the finding shows about the theory in question.

    Exam tips

    • Learn each theory with one supporting study and one limitation so you can answer either direction of question.
    • When a question gives a scenario, name the theory first, then apply its key terms to the scenario.
    • Use precise terminology such as reinforcement, innate capacity, critical period and interaction rather than vague phrases like 'they just learn it'.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the Children’s language development: theories and research about language development. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    Which theorist is most closely associated with the behaviourist explanation of language development?

    Listen

    This topic requires thorough knowledge of major theories and research about how children acquire spoken language. Research evidence encompasses longitudinal child language corpora, universal stages of acquisition (babbling, holophrastic, two-word, telegraphic), and studies of atypical development. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Identify a named theory of language development and state its central claim about how children acquire language. Describe research evidence that supports or challenges a given theory, such as data on stages of acquisition or atypical development. Distinguish between theories on a key issue, for example whether acquisition depends mainly on input, innate capacity or social interaction. Apply a theory to a described example of a child's language use and explain what the theory predicts or explains. A common slip: Confusing behaviourist and innatist claims. Instead, behaviourism explains acquisition through imitation and reinforcement; innatism explains it through an innate language capacity. Exam tip: Learn each theory with one supporting study and one limitation so you can answer either direction of question.

    See it

    A top-down flowchart with two groups. The first group shows four theories, each with an arrow to its central claim: Behaviourist (Skinner) leads to imitation and reinforcement; Nativist/innatist (Chomsky) leads to the Language Acquisition Device and universal grammar; Cognitive (Piaget) leads to cognitive development preceding linguistic competence; Social interactionist (Bruner and Vygotsky) leads to the Language Acquisition Support System, scaffolding and the zone of proximal development. The second group starts from Research evidence, which branches to three items: longitudinal child language corpora; universal stages of babbling, holophrastic, two-word and telegraphic; and studies of atypical development.
    It maps the four named theories of language development to their central claims and lists the research evidence used to evaluate them.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Theoretical accounts of acquisition

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Research evidence and studies

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Stages and patterns of development

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Strengths and limitations of theories

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Theoretical accounts of acquisition
    Frameworks covering behaviourist, nativist/innatist, cognitive and social interactionist explanations of how children acquire spoken language.
    Research evidence and studies
    Longitudinal child language corpora, universal stages of acquisition and studies of atypical development that support or challenge a given theory.
    Stages and patterns of development
    Universal stages of acquisition: babbling, holophrastic, two-word and telegraphic.
    Strengths and limitations of theories
    Evaluation of each account, acknowledging both supporting evidence and empirical limitations rather than treating one theory as fully proven.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A top-down flowchart with two groups. The first group shows four theories, each with an arrow to its central claim: Behaviourist (Skinner) leads to imitation and reinforcement; Nativist/innatist (Chomsky) leads to the Language Acquisition Device and universal grammar; Cognitive (Piaget) leads to cognitive development preceding linguistic competence; Social interactionist (Bruner and Vygotsky) leads to the Language Acquisition Support System, scaffolding and the zone of proximal development. The second group starts from Research evidence, which branches to three items: longitudinal child language corpora; universal stages of babbling, holophrastic, two-word and telegraphic; and studies of atypical development.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of Children’s language development: theories and research about language development.

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge