AQA · A-Level · History

    Course version: 7042 · Version from Sept 2017

    The collapse of the autocratic empires: Russia, Germany, Austria-Hungary…

    Full specification wording

    2K International Relations and Global Conflict, c1890–1941 (A-level only) – Second World War, 1917–1941 The end of the First World War and the peace settlement, 1917–1923: The collapse of the autocratic empires: Russia, Germany, Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire; nationalist ambitions and the impact on international relations and peace-making

    The end of the First World War triggered the collapse of four major autocratic empires, fundamentally altering global geopolitics.

    Checked against the AQA 7042 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 1 of 4
    • 4 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    The end of the First World War triggered the collapse of four major autocratic empires, fundamentally altering global geopolitics. In Russia, the 1917 revolutions replaced Tsarist autocracy with a Bolshevik state, creating ideological friction with the West. Germany's Kaiser abdicated in 1918, leading to the fragile Weimar Republic. The multi-ethnic Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires disintegrated entirely, unleashing suppressed nationalist ambitions. Groups like the Czechs, South Slavs, and Arabs demanded self-determination, creating a chaotic vacuum. This collapse profoundly impacted international relations and peace-making, as diplomats at Paris struggled to redraw borders, balance competing nationalist claims, and contain Bolshevism.

    What earns the marks

    • Identify the specific causes and nature of the collapse for each empire, such as the Bolshevik revolution in Russia and military defeat in Germany.
    • Explain how the disintegration of Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire created power vacuums filled by competing nationalist movements.
    • Analyse the impact of nationalist ambitions on the peace-making process, specifically the challenge of applying Wilson's principle of self-determination.
    • Evaluate how the collapse of these empires altered international relations, such as the ideological isolation of Soviet Russia and the instability of new Eastern European states.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Treating the collapse of all four empires as identical.

      Put it right: Distinguish between the ideological revolution in Russia, the regime change in Germany, and the complete territorial disintegration of Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire.

    • Assuming nationalist ambitions were easily resolved by the peace treaties.

      Put it right: Recognise that overlapping ethnic populations made clean borders impossible, leading to ongoing minority conflicts.

    • Ignoring the Ottoman Empire's collapse in European diplomacy.

      Put it right: Include the Middle Eastern mandates and the Greco-Turkish conflicts as direct consequences of Ottoman disintegration.

    Exam tips

    • When discussing the peace treaties, explicitly link the terms back to the geopolitical vacuum left by the collapsed empires.
    • Use specific examples of nationalist ambitions, such as the creation of Yugoslavia or Czechoslovakia, to illustrate the challenges faced by the peacemakers.
    • Contrast the ideological threat posed by the collapsed Russian Empire with the territorial challenges posed by the Austro-Hungarian collapse.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the 2K International Relations and Global Conflict, c1890–1941 (A-level only) – Second World War, 1917–1941 The end of the First World War and the peace settlement, 1917–1923: The collapse of the autocratic empires: Russia, Germany, Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire; nationalist ambitions and the impact on international relations and peace-making lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    Which four autocratic empires collapsed as a direct result of the First World War, fundamentally altering international relations and peace-making?

    Listen

    The end of the First World War triggered the collapse of four major autocratic empires, fundamentally altering global geopolitics. In Russia, the 1917 revolutions replaced Tsarist autocracy with a Bolshevik state, creating ideological friction with the West. Germany's Kaiser abdicated in 1918, leading to the fragile Weimar Republic. The multi-ethnic Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires disintegrated entirely, unleashing suppressed nationalist ambitions. Groups like the Czechs, South Slavs, and Arabs demanded self-determination, creating a chaotic vacuum. This collapse profoundly impacted international relations and peace-making, as diplomats at Paris struggled to redraw borders, balance competing nationalist claims, and contain Bolshevism. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Identify the specific causes and nature of the collapse for each empire, such as the Bolshevik revolution in Russia and military defeat in Germany. Explain how the disintegration of Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire created power vacuums filled by competing nationalist movements. Analyse the impact of nationalist ambitions on the peace-making process, specifically the challenge of applying Wilson's principle of self-determination. Evaluate how the collapse of these empires altered international relations, such as the ideological isolation of Soviet Russia and the instability of new Eastern European states. A common slip: Treating the collapse of all four empires as identical. Instead, distinguish between the ideological revolution in Russia, the regime change in Germany, and the complete territorial disintegration of Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire. Exam tip: When discussing the peace treaties, explicitly link the terms back to the geopolitical vacuum left by the collapsed empires.

    See it

    A top-down flowchart. A single node, 'Collapse of the autocratic empires', branches into four nodes: 'Russia', 'Germany', 'Austria-Hungary' and 'Ottoman Empire'. Russia leads to 'Bolshevik state and ideological friction with the West'; Germany leads to 'Kaiser abdicates and Weimar Republic'. Both Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire lead to a shared node, 'Disintegration and nationalist ambitions'. That node, together with the Russia and Germany outcome nodes, leads into a final node, 'Peace-making at Paris'.
    It shows the collapse of the four autocratic empires and how each outcome fed into the peace-making process.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Imperial collapse and regime change

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Nationalism and self-determination

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Ideological conflict

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Geopolitical instability and border disputes

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Imperial collapse and regime change
    The collapse of four major autocratic empires, with Russia replaced by a Bolshevik state and Germany's Kaiser abdicating in 1918 to leave the fragile Weimar Republic.
    Nationalism and self-determination
    Suppressed nationalist ambitions unleashed by the disintegration of the multi-ethnic Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires, with groups demanding self-determination and creating a chaotic vacuum.
    Ideological conflict
    Ideological friction with the West created when the 1917 revolutions replaced Tsarist autocracy in Russia with a Bolshevik state.
    Geopolitical instability and border disputes
    A chaotic vacuum in which diplomats at Paris struggled to redraw borders, balance competing nationalist claims and contain Bolshevism.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A top-down flowchart. A single node, 'Collapse of the autocratic empires', branches into four nodes: 'Russia', 'Germany', 'Austria-Hungary' and 'Ottoman Empire'. Russia leads to 'Bolshevik state and ideological friction with the West'; Germany leads to 'Kaiser abdicates and Weimar Republic'. Both Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire lead to a shared node, 'Disintegration and nationalist ambitions'. That node, together with the Russia and Germany outcome nodes, leads into a final node, 'Peace-making at Paris'.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of 2K International Relations and Global Conflict, c1890–1941 (A-level only) – Second World War, 1917–1941 The end of the First World War and the peace settlement, 1917–1923: The collapse of the autocratic empires: Russia, Germany, Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire; nationalist ambitions and the impact on international relations and peace-making

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge