OCR · GCSE · History
Course version: J410 · Version from Mar 2026
Reasons why Charles I called Parliament in 1640; the Long Parliament’s…
Full specification wording
Personal Rule to Restoration 1629–1660 (J410/13) - Relationship between Parliament and Charles I 1629–1642: Reasons why Charles I called Parliament in 1640; the Long Parliament’s criticisms of Charles I’s Personal Rule, including financial and religious measures and suppression of criticism (1629–1640); attacks on Laud and Strafford; events leading to civil war, including rebellion in Ireland in 1641, Grand Remonstrance 1641, attempt on the Five Members 1642, Militia Ordinance 1642, Nineteen Propositions 1642; divisions within Parliament 1640–1642.
Charles called Parliament in 1640 because the Bishops' Wars against Scotland left him short of money and unable to crush Scottish resistance to his prayer book.
Checked against the OCR J410 specification (opens in a new tab) on .
- 3 key terms
Study notes
From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.
The idea
Charles called Parliament in 1640 because the Bishops' Wars against Scotland left him short of money and unable to crush Scottish resistance to his prayer book. The Short Parliament was dissolved quickly; the Long Parliament then attacked the Personal Rule of 1629–1640, criticising financial devices such as ship money and religious policies associated with Laud, and resenting the suppression of criticism through the courts. Parliament impeached Strafford and Laud. Rebellion in Ireland in 1641 raised fears of an army and of Catholic violence. The Grand Remonstrance of 1641 listed grievances, the attempt on the Five Members in 1642 showed the breakdown of trust, and the Militia Ordinance and Nineteen Propositions of 1642 divided the political nation. Divisions within Parliament between those seeking settlement and those pushing reform helped turn dispute into civil war.
What earns the marks
- Identifies shortage of money after the Bishops' Wars as a reason Charles called Parliament in 1640.
- Explains that the Long Parliament criticised financial measures of the Personal Rule such as ship money.
- Links criticism of Laudian religious policy to the Long Parliament's grievances.
- Places the Grand Remonstrance, the attempt on the Five Members, the Militia Ordinance and the Nineteen Propositions in the sequence leading to civil war.
- Recognises divisions within Parliament between 1640 and 1642 as a factor in the collapse into war.
Common mistakes and how to put them right
Treats the Short Parliament and the Long Parliament as the same body.
Put it right: Distinguish the brief 1640 assembly from the Long Parliament that met later in 1640.
Assumes the Grand Remonstrance declared war.
Put it right: Recognise it as a statement of grievances that deepened distrust.
Places the attempt on the Five Members before the Irish rebellion.
Put it right: Keep the 1641 rebellion ahead of the 1642 attempt in the sequence.
Ignores divisions inside Parliament.
Put it right: Include the split between those wanting settlement and those pressing further reform.
Exam tips
- Read each option against the exact date given in the question before choosing.
- Link each event to the clause it belongs to: money, religion, criticism, or the slide to war.
- Eliminate options that merge two separate events into one.
- Check that the chosen option names the correct body, such as the Long Parliament rather than the Short Parliament.
Try the lesson
The start of the Personal Rule to Restoration 1629–1660 (J410/13) - Relationship between Parliament and Charles I 1629–1642: Reasons why Charles I called Parliament in 1640; the Long Parliament’s criticisms of Charles I’s Personal Rule, including financial and religious measures and suppression of criticism (1629–1640); attacks on Laud and Strafford; events leading to civil war, including rebellion in Ireland in 1641, Grand Remonstrance 1641, attempt on the Five Members 1642, Militia Ordinance 1642, Nineteen Propositions 1642; divisions within Parliament 1640–1642. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.
Have a go first
Which of Charles I's advisers was attacked by Parliament and executed in 1641?
Listen
Charles called Parliament in 1640 because the Bishops' Wars against Scotland left him short of money and unable to crush Scottish resistance to his prayer book. The Short Parliament was dissolved quickly; the Long Parliament then attacked the Personal Rule of 1629–1640, criticising financial devices such as ship money and religious policies associated with Laud, and resenting the suppression of criticism through the courts. Parliament impeached Strafford and Laud. Rebellion in Ireland in 1641 raised fears of an army and of Catholic violence. The Grand Remonstrance of 1641 listed grievances, the attempt on the Five Members in 1642 showed the breakdown of trust, and the Militia Ordinance and Nineteen Propositions of 1642 divided the political nation. Divisions within Parliament between those seeking settlement and those pushing reform helped turn dispute into civil war. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Identifies shortage of money after the Bishops' Wars as a reason Charles called Parliament in 1640. Explains that the Long Parliament criticised financial measures of the Personal Rule such as ship money. Links criticism of Laudian religious policy to the Long Parliament's grievances. Places the Grand Remonstrance, the attempt on the Five Members, the Militia Ordinance and the Nineteen Propositions in the sequence leading to civil war. Exam tip: Read each option against the exact date given in the question before choosing.
Put the events in order
Put these events in the order they happened, earliest first.
- 1. Charles called Parliament because the Bishops' Wars left him short of money
- 2. The attempt on the Five Members showed the breakdown of trust
- 3. Rebellion in Ireland raised fears of an army and Catholic violence
Key words
Say what each word means before you turn the card.
Financial pressure and the calling of Parliament
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
Criticism of the Personal Rule
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
Religious policy and the attacks on Laud and Strafford
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
See every definition
- Financial pressure and the calling of Parliament
- Charles called Parliament in 1640 because the Bishops' Wars against Scotland left him short of money and unable to crush Scottish resistance to his prayer book.
- Criticism of the Personal Rule
- The Long Parliament attacked the Personal Rule of 1629–1640, criticising financial devices such as ship money and religious policies associated with Laud, and resenting the suppression of criticism through the courts.
- Religious policy and the attacks on Laud and Strafford
- Parliament impeached Strafford and Laud, having criticised religious policies associated with Laud.
There is more to this lesson
The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge
Test your understanding of Personal Rule to Restoration 1629–1660 (J410/13) - Relationship between Parliament and Charles I 1629–1642: Reasons why Charles I called Parliament in 1640; the Long Parliament’s criticisms of Charles I’s Personal Rule, including financial and religious measures and suppression of criticism (1629–1640); attacks on Laud and Strafford; events leading to civil war, including rebellion in Ireland in 1641, Grand Remonstrance 1641, attempt on the Five Members 1642, Militia Ordinance 1642, Nineteen Propositions 1642; divisions within Parliament 1640–1642.
Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge