Pearson Edexcel · A-Level · History

    Course version: 9HI0 · Version from Sept 2015

    The Great Terror 1794: the purge of the Hébertists and Indulgents;…

    Full specification wording

    The National Convention, the Jacobins and the Terror, 1793–94: The Great Terror 1794: the purge of the Hébertists and Indulgents; religious radicalism; the legislation of terror and centralisation; the extent and nature of the Terror in Paris and the regions; the role of Robespierre and St-Just.

    In spring 1794 the Committee of Public Safety struck at both flanks of the Convention.

    Checked against the Pearson Edexcel 9HI0 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 3 of 4
    • 4 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    In spring 1794 the Committee of Public Safety struck at both flanks of the Convention. Hébertists, pushing dechristianisation, were arrested in March and guillotined; Danton's Indulgents, urging peace, followed in April. Religious radicalism was checked by Robespierre's cult of the Supreme Being. The Law of 22 Prairial simplified Revolutionary Tribunal procedure. Centralisation tightened through the recall of errant représentants en mission and the disbanding of the armées révolutionnaires. Terror operated unevenly: Paris saw concentrated executions, whereas the Vendée and Lyon experienced mass repression. Robespierre shaped this through rhetoric and committee work in Paris, while Saint-Just also acted as a représentant en mission.

    What earns the marks

    • Explains that the Hébertists were purged in March 1794 for ultra-radical dechristianisation and wage agitation, showing the Committee's determination to control the popular movement.
    • Explains that the Indulgents, associated with Danton and Desmoulins, were purged in April 1794 for advocating peace and an end to terror, demonstrating that moderation was equally dangerous.
    • Analyses religious radicalism: dechristianisation campaigns, the Festival of Reason, and Robespierre's counter-move with the cult of the Supreme Being in May 1794.
    • Assesses the legislation of terror and centralisation, including the Law of 22 Prairial, the role of the Committee of Public Safety, and the disbanding of the armées révolutionnaires to assert central control.
    • Compares the extent and nature of the Terror in Paris, where the Revolutionary Tribunal concentrated executions, with the regions, where the Vendée and Lyon saw different forms of repression.
    • Evaluates the roles of Robespierre and Saint-Just, noting Robespierre's leadership in Paris and Saint-Just's dual role as an orator and a mission representative.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Treating the Terror as a single uniform event.

      Put it right by distinguishing Parisian tribunal executions from regional military repression and by noting different chronologies.

    • Assuming Robespierre personally ordered every execution or served on mission.

      Put it right by explaining the collective Committee of Public Safety, and that Robespierre remained in Paris while others like Saint-Just were représentants en mission.

    • Believing the armées révolutionnaires drove centralisation during the Great Terror.

      Put it right by noting they were disbanded in spring 1794 to curb radical popular terror and centralise authority.

    Exam tips

    • Anchor answers in precise dates and laws, such as March and April 1794 purges and the Law of 22 Prairial, to demonstrate secure chronological knowledge.
    • When discussing extent, use comparative language about Paris and the regions rather than treating one as representative of all.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the The National Convention, the Jacobins and the Terror, 1793–94: The Great Terror 1794: the purge of the Hébertists and Indulgents; religious radicalism; the legislation of terror and centralisation; the extent and nature of the Terror in Paris and the regions; the role of Robespierre and St-Just. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    Which group was purged in March 1794 for demanding more extreme terror and dechristianisation?

    Listen

    In spring 1794 the Committee of Public Safety struck at both flanks of the Convention. Hébertists, pushing dechristianisation, were arrested in March and guillotined; Danton's Indulgents, urging peace, followed in April. Religious radicalism was checked by Robespierre's cult of the Supreme Being. The Law of 22 Prairial simplified Revolutionary Tribunal procedure. Centralisation tightened through the recall of errant représentants en mission and the disbanding of the armées révolutionnaires. Terror operated unevenly: Paris saw concentrated executions, whereas the Vendée and Lyon experienced mass repression. Robespierre shaped this through rhetoric and committee work in Paris, while Saint-Just also acted as a représentant en mission. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Explains that the Hébertists were purged in March 1794 for ultra-radical dechristianisation and wage agitation, showing the Committee's determination to control the popular movement. Explains that the Indulgents, associated with Danton and Desmoulins, were purged in April 1794 for advocating peace and an end to terror, demonstrating that moderation was equally dangerous. Analyses religious radicalism: dechristianisation campaigns, the Festival of Reason, and Robespierre's counter-move with the cult of the Supreme Being in May 1794. Assesses the legislation of terror and centralisation, including the Law of 22 Prairial, the role of the Committee of Public Safety, and the disbanding of the armées révolutionnaires to assert central control. A common slip: Treating the Terror as a single uniform event. Instead, distinguishing Parisian tribunal executions from regional military repression and by noting different chronologies. Exam tip: Anchor answers in precise dates and laws, such as March and April 1794 purges and the Law of 22 Prairial, to demonstrate secure chronological knowledge.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Hébertists

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Indulgents

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    cult of the Supreme Being

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Law of 22 Prairial

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Hébertists
    Those pushing dechristianisation, who were arrested in March and guillotined for ultra-radical dechristianisation and wage agitation.
    Indulgents
    Danton's group, urging peace, who were purged in April 1794 for advocating peace and an end to terror.
    cult of the Supreme Being
    Robespierre's counter-move in May 1794, by which religious radicalism was checked.
    Law of 22 Prairial
    Legislation that simplified Revolutionary Tribunal procedure.

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of The National Convention, the Jacobins and the Terror, 1793–94: The Great Terror 1794: the purge of the Hébertists and Indulgents; religious radicalism; the legislation of terror and centralisation; the extent and nature of the Terror in Paris and the regions; the role of Robespierre and St-Just.

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge