Pearson Edexcel · A-Level · History

    Course version: 9HI0 · Version from Sept 2015

    The extent to which ‘big government’ was reduced.

    Full specification wording

    What impact did the Reagan presidency (1981–89) have on the USA in the years 1981–96?: The extent to which ‘big government’ was reduced.

    ‘Big government’ means extensive federal intervention in the economy and welfare.

    Checked against the Pearson Edexcel 9HI0 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 2 of 4
    • 4 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    ‘Big government’ means extensive federal intervention in the economy and welfare. Reagan promised to reduce it by cutting taxes, deregulating and shrinking domestic programmes. In practice, the extent was limited. Deregulation and tax cuts did reduce some federal reach, and some welfare rolls fell. However, defence spending rose, Social Security and Medicare were protected, and federal deficits and debt grew. The bureaucracy was not dramatically dismantled.

    What earns the marks

    • Defines ‘big government’ as federal spending, taxation, regulation and welfare provision, and uses that definition consistently.
    • Explains Reagan’s aims to reduce big government through tax cuts, deregulation and cuts to domestic programmes.
    • Provides evidence of limited reduction, such as continued or increased defence spending, protection of Social Security and Medicare, and rising deficits and debt.
    • Assesses areas where federal reach did shrink, such as deregulation in some industries and reduced eligibility or funding for some welfare programmes.
    • Reaches a reasoned overall judgement on the extent of reduction, recognising continuity as well as change.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Equating tax cuts with a smaller state.

      Put it right: Examine spending, regulation and federal responsibilities as well, because deficits and debt can grow even when taxes fall.

    • Ignoring protected programmes; correction: note that Social Security and Medicare were politically difficult to cut and continued to consume large federal funds.

    • Treating ‘big government’ as only welfare.

      Put it right: Include defence, taxation, regulation and the overall scale of federal activity in the assessment.

    Exam tips

    • Define ‘big government’ at the start so the extent of reduction can be measured against clear criteria.
    • Use a balanced structure that examines evidence for reduction and evidence against it before reaching a judgement.
    • Refer to specific policies and outcomes, such as deregulation, tax changes, defence budgets and entitlement spending, rather than general statements.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the What impact did the Reagan presidency (1981–89) have on the USA in the years 1981–96?: The extent to which ‘big government’ was reduced. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    Which statement describes Reagan's stated aim towards 'big government' when he took office in 1981?

    Listen

    Big government’ means extensive federal intervention in the economy and welfare. Reagan promised to reduce it by cutting taxes, deregulating and shrinking domestic programmes. In practice, the extent was limited. Deregulation and tax cuts did reduce some federal reach, and some welfare rolls fell. However, defence spending rose, Social Security and Medicare were protected, and federal deficits and debt grew. The bureaucracy was not dramatically dismantled. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Defines ‘big government’ as federal spending, taxation, regulation and welfare provision, and uses that definition consistently. Explains Reagan’s aims to reduce big government through tax cuts, deregulation and cuts to domestic programmes. Provides evidence of limited reduction, such as continued or increased defence spending, protection of Social Security and Medicare, and rising deficits and debt. Assesses areas where federal reach did shrink, such as deregulation in some industries and reduced eligibility or funding for some welfare programmes. A common slip: Equating tax cuts with a smaller state. Instead, examine spending, regulation and federal responsibilities as well, because deficits and debt can grow even when taxes fall. Exam tip: Define ‘big government’ at the start so the extent of reduction can be measured against clear criteria.

    See it

    A flowchart beginning with a node defining big government as federal spending, taxation, regulation and welfare. An arrow leads to Reagan's aims: tax cuts, deregulation and cuts to domestic programmes. From this node two branches emerge. The first lists evidence of reduction: deregulation in some industries, reduced eligibility or funding for some welfare programmes, and some welfare rolls falling. The second lists evidence of limited reduction: defence spending rose, Social Security and Medicare were protected, deficits and debt grew, and the bureaucracy was not dramatically dismantled. Both branches lead to a final node giving the judgement that big government was reshaped rather than reversed.
    Shows Reagan's aims to reduce big government, the evidence for and against reduction, and the overall judgement that big government was reshaped rather than reversed.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Big government

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Deregulation and the role of the state

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Welfare and entitlement programmes

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Deficits, debt and political limits

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Big government
    Extensive federal intervention in the economy and welfare, measured by federal spending, taxation, regulation and welfare provision.
    Deregulation and the role of the state
    A means by which Reagan promised to reduce big government, and which did reduce some federal reach.
    Welfare and entitlement programmes
    Domestic programmes that Reagan promised to shrink, though some welfare rolls fell while Social Security and Medicare were protected.
    Deficits, debt and political limits
    Federal deficits and debt grew, showing the political limits on reducing big government, which was reshaped rather than reversed.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 2 boxes numbered instead of named. A flowchart beginning with a node defining big government as federal spending, taxation, regulation and welfare. An arrow leads to Reagan's aims: tax cuts, deregulation and cuts to domestic programmes. From this node two branches emerge. The first lists evidence of reduction: deregulation in some industries, reduced eligibility or funding for some welfare programmes, and some welfare rolls falling. The second lists evidence of limited reduction: defence spending rose, Social Security and Medicare were protected, deficits and debt grew, and the bureaucracy was not dramatically dismantled. Both branches lead to a final node giving the judgement that big government was reshaped rather than reversed.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    0 of 2 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of What impact did the Reagan presidency (1981–89) have on the USA in the years 1981–96?: The extent to which ‘big government’ was reduced.

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge