Pearson Edexcel · GCSE · History
Course version: 1HI0 · Version from Sept 2016
C1700–c1900: Warfare and British society in the eighteenth and nineteenth…
Full specification wording
Option 12: c1700–c1900: Warfare and British society in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries - 3 Case studies ● The Battle of Waterloo (1815): reasons for its outcome; the role of the Duke of Wellington.: The Battle of Balaclava (1854): reasons for its outcome; the role of Lord Raglan.
The Battle of Balaclava (1854) was a key Crimean War engagement defined by heroic stands and disastrous miscommunications.
Checked against the Pearson Edexcel 1HI0 specification (opens in a new tab) on .
Study notes
From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.
The idea
The Battle of Balaclava (1854) was a key Crimean War engagement defined by heroic stands and disastrous miscommunications. The outcome was a tactical draw, as Russian forces failed to capture the British base. This outcome was heavily influenced by the role of Lord Raglan, the British commander. Raglan's vague written orders and his high vantage point, which did not match the limited view of his subordinates, led directly to the Charge of the Light Brigade. Poor communication between Raglan, Nolan, and Lucan caused the cavalry to charge the wrong artillery battery, suffering heavy casualties. The successful 'Thin Red Line' and the Charge of the Heavy Brigade prevented a Russian victory despite Raglan's significant command errors.
What earns the marks
- Explain how Lord Raglan's vague orders contributed to the disastrous Charge of the Light Brigade.
- Describe the impact of the terrain and Raglan's high vantage point on the misinterpretation of his orders by Lord Lucan.
- Analyse the role of the 'Thin Red Line' (93rd Highlanders) in halting the Russian cavalry advance.
- Evaluate the success of the Charge of the Heavy Brigade in disrupting the Russian attack.
- Assess the overall outcome of the battle as a tactical draw but a strategic failure for the Russians.
Common mistakes and how to put them right
Stating that the Charge of the Light Brigade was a complete military defeat for the British.
Put it right: While casualties were high, the Light Brigade did reach the guns and force a Russian retreat, and the overall battle prevented the Russians from taking Balaclava.
Blaming only Lord Raglan for the Light Brigade disaster.
Put it right: The disaster was a combination of Raglan's vague orders, Nolan's poor delivery, and Lucan's failure to clarify the objective.
Confusing the roles of the Heavy and Light Brigades.
Put it right: The Heavy Brigade successfully charged uphill to defeat a larger Russian cavalry force, whereas the Light Brigade charged down a valley into concentrated artillery fire.
Exam tips
- Clearly distinguish between the actions of the Light Brigade, the Heavy Brigade, and the 93rd Highlanders when explaining the battle's outcome.
- Focus on the chain of command and communication failures when evaluating Lord Raglan's role.
- Use the Battle of Balaclava to illustrate wider themes of aristocratic leadership and military incompetence in the nineteenth century.
Try the lesson
The start of the Option 12: c1700–c1900: Warfare and British society in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries - 3 Case studies ● The Battle of Waterloo (1815): reasons for its outcome; the role of the Duke of Wellington.: The Battle of Balaclava (1854): reasons for its outcome; the role of Lord Raglan. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.
Have a go first
Which British commander was in overall charge of the army at the Battle of Balaclava in 1854?
Listen
The Battle of Balaclava (1854) was a key Crimean War engagement defined by heroic stands and disastrous miscommunications. The outcome was a tactical draw, as Russian forces failed to capture the British base. This outcome was heavily influenced by the role of Lord Raglan, the British commander. Raglan's vague written orders and his high vantage point, which did not match the limited view of his subordinates, led directly to the Charge of the Light Brigade. Poor communication between Raglan, Nolan, and Lucan caused the cavalry to charge the wrong artillery battery, suffering heavy casualties. The successful 'Thin Red Line' and the Charge of the Heavy Brigade prevented a Russian victory despite Raglan's significant command errors. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Explain how Lord Raglan's vague orders contributed to the disastrous Charge of the Light Brigade. Describe the impact of the terrain and Raglan's high vantage point on the misinterpretation of his orders by Lord Lucan. Analyse the role of the 'Thin Red Line' (93rd Highlanders) in halting the Russian cavalry advance. Evaluate the success of the Charge of the Heavy Brigade in disrupting the Russian attack. A common slip: Stating that the Charge of the Light Brigade was a complete military defeat for the British. Instead, while casualties were high, the Light Brigade did reach the guns and force a Russian retreat, and the overall battle prevented the Russians from taking Balaclava. Exam tip: Clearly distinguish between the actions of the Light Brigade, the Heavy Brigade, and the 93rd Highlanders when explaining the battle's outcome.
There is more to this lesson
The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge
Test your understanding of Option 12: c1700–c1900: Warfare and British society in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries - 3 Case studies ● The Battle of Waterloo (1815): reasons for its outcome; the role of the Duke of Wellington.: The Battle of Balaclava (1854): reasons for its outcome; the role of Lord Raglan.
Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge