Pearson Edexcel · GCSE · Psychology

    Course version: 1PS0 · Version from Sept 2017

    Be able to write an alternative hypothesis

    Full specification wording

    Designing psychological research: 11.1.4 Be able to write an alternative hypothesis

    An alternative hypothesis is a precise, testable statement predicting the outcome of a psychological study.

    Checked against the Pearson Edexcel 1PS0 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 4 of 17
    • 4 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    An alternative hypothesis is a precise, testable statement predicting the outcome of a psychological study. Unlike a null hypothesis, which predicts no effect, the alternative hypothesis states that there will be a significant difference or relationship between variables. To write one effectively, you must clearly operationalise both the independent variable (IV) and the dependent variable (DV). For example, instead of saying caffeine affects memory, a strong alternative hypothesis would state: Participants who consume 50mg of caffeine will recall significantly more words from a list of 20 than participants who consume no caffeine. This clearly identifies the two conditions of the IV and how the DV is measured, making the prediction fully testable.

    What earns the marks

    • Identifies the independent variable (IV) and its specific conditions.
    • Identifies the dependent variable (DV) and exactly how it is operationalised.
    • States a clear prediction of a difference (for experiments) or a relationship (for correlations).
    • Ensures the statement is testable, specific and unambiguous.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Writing a null hypothesis instead of an alternative hypothesis.

      Put it right: Ensure the statement predicts an effect, difference, or relationship, rather than stating there will be no effect.

    • Failing to operationalise the variables.

      Put it right: State exactly how the IV is manipulated and how the DV is measured, such as specifying time taken in seconds rather than just speed.

    • Writing an aim instead of a hypothesis.

      Put it right: Write a predictive statement of the expected results, not a statement of what the study intends to investigate.

    Exam tips

    • Always include both conditions of the independent variable in your hypothesis to ensure clarity.
    • Check that your dependent variable is measurable; if you cannot measure it, you cannot test the hypothesis.
    • Read the scenario carefully to determine if you need to predict a difference for an experiment or a relationship for a correlation.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the Designing psychological research: 11.1.4 Be able to write an alternative hypothesis lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    Which of the following best defines a directional alternative hypothesis?

    Listen

    An alternative hypothesis is a precise, testable statement predicting the outcome of a psychological study. Unlike a null hypothesis, which predicts no effect, the alternative hypothesis states that there will be a significant difference or relationship between variables. To write one effectively, you must clearly operationalise both the independent variable (IV) and the dependent variable (DV). For example, instead of saying caffeine affects memory, a strong alternative hypothesis would state: Participants who consume 50mg of caffeine will recall significantly more words from a list of 20 than participants who consume no caffeine. This clearly identifies the two conditions of the IV and how the DV is measured, making the prediction fully testable. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Identifies the independent variable (IV) and its specific conditions. Identifies the dependent variable (DV) and exactly how it is operationalised. States a clear prediction of a difference (for experiments) or a relationship (for correlations). Ensures the statement is testable, specific and unambiguous. A common slip: Writing a null hypothesis instead of an alternative hypothesis. Instead, Ensure the statement predicts an effect, difference, or relationship, rather than stating there will be no effect. Exam tip: Always include both conditions of the independent variable in your hypothesis to ensure clarity.

    See it

    A top-down flowchart starting from a node labelled 'Alternative hypothesis'. Two arrows lead from it: one to 'Identify the IV and its specific conditions' and one to 'Identify the DV and how it is operationalised'. Both of these nodes lead to 'State a clear prediction'. From that node, two arrows lead to 'Predict a difference (experiments)' and 'Predict a relationship (correlations)'. Both of these final prediction nodes lead to a single end node labelled 'Testable, specific and unambiguous statement'.
    Shows the steps for writing an alternative hypothesis: identifying the IV and its conditions, identifying the operationalised DV, stating a clear prediction of a difference or relationship, and ensuring the statement is testable, specific and unambiguous.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Alternative hypothesis

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Operationalise

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Independent variable (IV)

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Dependent variable (DV)

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Alternative hypothesis
    A precise, testable statement predicting the outcome of a psychological study, stating that there will be a significant difference or relationship between variables.
    Operationalise
    State exactly how the independent variable is manipulated and how the dependent variable is measured, making the prediction fully testable.
    Independent variable (IV)
    The variable whose specific conditions are identified and manipulated in the study.
    Dependent variable (DV)
    The variable that is measured, and which must be operationalised so it can be tested.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A top-down flowchart starting from a node labelled 'Alternative hypothesis'. Two arrows lead from it: one to 'Identify the IV and its specific conditions' and one to 'Identify the DV and how it is operationalised'. Both of these nodes lead to 'State a clear prediction'. From that node, two arrows lead to 'Predict a difference (experiments)' and 'Predict a relationship (correlations)'. Both of these final prediction nodes lead to a single end node labelled 'Testable, specific and unambiguous statement'.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of Designing psychological research: 11.1.4 Be able to write an alternative hypothesis

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge