This element focuses on the practical skills and underpinning knowledge needed to prepare for, implement, and record non-intrusive archaeological investiga
Topic Synopsis
This element focuses on the practical skills and underpinning knowledge needed to prepare for, implement, and record non-intrusive archaeological investigations, such as geophysical survey, fieldwalking, and earthwork survey. Learners must demonstrate competence in setting up equipment, taking accurate measurements, and producing clear site records and schedules that conform to professional standards and project specifications.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Stratigraphy: The study of soil layers (strata) and their chronological sequence, essential for interpreting site history and dating finds.
- Context Recording: Detailed documentation of each archaeological context (e.g., feature, layer, cut) using standard proformas, including descriptions, relationships, and interpretations.
- Excavation Techniques: Methods such as trowelling, mattocking, and use of mechanical excavators, with emphasis on preserving stratigraphic integrity and recovering artefacts.
- Finds Processing: Cleaning, marking, bagging, and cataloguing artefacts and ecofacts, following museum standards and conservation guidelines.
- Site Surveying: Using equipment like dumpy levels, GPS, and total stations to create accurate plans and sections, integrating data into GIS systems.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- In portfolio evidence, include photographs of you performing key tasks (e.g., laying out a grid, taking readings) accompanied by annotated notes to demonstrate your active role.
- Cross-reference your observation records with the project’s research design to show you understand how data collection meets investigative aims.
- When describing techniques, always link them to their archaeological applications—for instance, explain why resistivity is chosen over magnetometry on a specific site.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Failing to conduct pre-survey checks like battery levels or cable integrity, leading to data loss or unreliable results during non-intrusive investigations.
- Poor grid establishment—not squaring baselines or forgetting to record station coordinates, rendering spatial data inaccurate.
- Omitting contextual information in records (e.g., soil conditions, recent land use) that could affect interpretation of anomalies.
Examiner Marking Points
- Award credit for demonstrating thorough preparation, including checking equipment functionality and calibrating instruments as per manufacturer instructions and project documentation.
- Evidence must show accurate observation and logging of measurements, with clear distinction between data types (e.g., resistance, magnetometry) and proper use of grid systems.
- Records and schedules must be complete, legible, and structured, including metadata such as date, personnel, weather conditions, and any deviations from the planned methodology.